Posted on 07/08/2014 9:50:53 AM PDT by Red Badger
Here let me do it. Bush was a Big Government Liberal much like LBJ who expanded the federal government, added agencies to it who would later turn against us, and appointed Liberal friends to run it all. His friends like USAG Gonzales tried his best to establish government databases on We The People's legal activities.
Bush was the main man who paved the way for the abuses of Obama we live under today. He was the turd who also swung the doors to Mexico wide open because of his NAFTA Crap. Oh and Bush was also the man who in 2000 said he and Mr. Gore were not far apart on most issues. The Nation Building US Chamber of Commerce Chimp. There you have it. That is the factual difference between the two men.
Old American Tradition—If you are cheated out of the White House—Run again and win—Who can say Mittens wasn’t cheated? Who can say he would have been a better president than Obama? (remember the I will cancel Obamacare on the first day in office?). Would he be a great president??? I don’t know—whould he be good for business—YES. Give him a Tea Party House and Senate and he will go to town. Romney Should be President after the bum rap he got in 2012. Who ever gets in will face the long knives of the Liberal Communist Press.
Very well stated. I agree with it. I wasn’t sharp enough to make this connection with arthurus initial post. That must be why some people here and elsewhere say that I am sharp as marble. Ha
That's the problem. He would have a pen and phone too. That is not how our Constitutional government was set up to work. Romney is another North East Liberal Elitist like the so called "Texas" Bush clan. No thanks none for me. Get another POTUS in the Whitehouse is America First and not the sock puppet of the one united party system of government lobbyist.
Same here. I've had arguments with Republicans who voted for Obama in 2012, thinking him the better choice than Romney. Republicans! The democrats are more anti-Romney for sure, so he won't win them over. Romney needs to go away.
I think Mitt’s going to run also. He’s still trying to talk Ann into it. If he does run he will really screw up Perry and Cruz because the GOPe big money boys will jump on the bandwagon for MItt. I hope he doesn’t run but I would not count on it.
There he is!
The Democrats and the Libertarians would love to see Mitt Romney run again. The opposition research has already been done and all that they would have to do is recycle it.
Sadly many want to tell us we aren’t conservatives because we don’t bother to hate Romney. Or for many of them it’s because I don’t bother to hate W or the elder Bush.
When I say that Romney ran on a very conservative platform, they say well Romney is a liar. Certainly he is a politician.
Anyways long story short, Obama is an incredibly arrogant and dangerous leftist president, Hilary is just as bad and possibly even more incompetent, certainly she and Bill are just as corrupt. And if they run Elizabeth Warren we are straight into George McGovern radical fantasy land.
Been following politics a long time, I have never seen this country take as bad a turn as is occurring under Obama. I don’t have time to hate most republicans.
Romney wasn’t cheated, but he did prove that a pro-abortion nominee can win the Independents and lose the election by losing the GOP base.
Romney has proven for 20 years that he can’t win elections, having only a single victory to his name, and that didn’t make 50% and he did so poorly in office that he couldn’t run fro reelection.
Romney did lie, after winning the nomination he returned to being pro-abortion, restated his position on Gay Scout leaders, and ran pro-choice ads in battleground states like Ohio, Virginia, and Wisconsin, and lost them all.
Frankly I didn’t think there was any chance Romney would run again. I know politics is a rough business, but boy do we ever need the party and these politicians to do what is right for the country. They need to cooperate on a winnable put America first candidate, before it is too late to save this country.
I had the honor of seeing Reagan in person, and we do not have a leader, speaker, thinker of his caliber. Not even close. People will come all out for this one or that one, but let’s be serious this current crop are midgets in comparison.
Reagan had many outstanding qualities, and one we’ve lost sight of is the wisdom that came with AGE. We are so hung up on a presidential candidate being “young enough”.
The Romneys do seem to hate America.
From his family line never having served in the military during their 170 year history, to his dad being the weird, anti-war presidential candidate in 1968, to his mother being a before her time, pro-abortion Senate candidate, to Mitt’s draft dodging, and leaving the GOP to his fund raising for democrats and Planned Parenthood, and his radical leftist agenda for the GOP, to his military avoiding sons, and the continued 170 year tradition of living in a Mormon bubble, largely separated from the rest of America, the family seems to dislike America.
Mitt Romney has no love for America or conservatism, he is bitter about both of them and what he sees as the treatment of his family and his Prophet who his family came here to serve in the early 1840s.
What did Bush do on taxes? Do you think his Supreme Court nominee were in any way different than Obama’s? There are a lot more differences to be explored for people who THINK and not just react emotionally.
Yes. I had my issues with Bush being a liberal Republican. However, he’s miles better than Gore or Kerry, not to mention Obama.
The GOPushers pushing Romney again.
I see you are a deep thinker. Good thing you had that union job.
I agree that by being governor in Mass., then running to the right in 2012, Romney does deserve the label as a political zig zagger. That’s a shame and was never a problem with Reagan. Even W was fairly consistent, but he came out of Texas.
However, I can’t hold Romney’s loss in Mass. against him, the state is absurdly liberal. Job performance is no guarantee of success there. Look at who they have in office now.
You are making things up and agreeing with your own ridiculous evasion.
Mitt Romney is a dedicated, radical leftist, and was long before he rejected running for governor of Utah, to run in Massachusetts.
Why do you think he left the GOP and was anti-Reagan, and didn’t return to the GOP until after Reagan’s veep was defeated and Clinton had won? Why do you think he became a democrat supporter, fund raiser, and voter? Why do you think he fund raised and supported planned Parenthood, was anti-Jess Helms and Contract with America so passionately pro-abortion and anti-gun, and ran to the left of Ted Kennedy on some issues, and wanted to homosexualize the military and Boy Scouts, many years before his failed single term as governor?
Why do you think he moved back so radically left after winning the nomination, that he had pursued for at least 6 years?
We have never seen anything like Mitt Romney, and his causal lying and complete reversals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.