Posted on 07/08/2014 8:29:35 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
It’s a confirmation of reports in June that ISIS had taken control of a site where some of Saddam’s WMD arsenal remained.
Iraq has informed the United Nations that the Islamic State extremist group has taken control of a vast former chemical weapons facility northwest of Baghdad where 2,500 chemical rockets filled with the deadly nerve agent sarin or their remnants were stored along with other chemical warfare agents.
Iraq’s U.N. Ambassador Mohamed Ali Alhakim said in a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon circulated Tuesday that “terrorist” groups entered the Muthanna site June 11 and seized weapons and equipment from the protection force guarding the facility.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Why are we getting a story now?
Because apparently ISIS has captured the facility.
So they are now in possession of inert gas?
I think Blix got eaten by a shark in North Korea circa 2004
Actually we have no idea even what was in the facility we bombed. At least one of the bunkers were too dangerous to enter. All we could do was use a remote controlled camera device to record what could be seen. No samples of the actual rocket artillery shells were taken for analysis, but active WMD chemicals tested positive within the bunker. The total number of artillery shells were estimated. They could not even see all the equipment in that bunker from the camera. So in this case, a consensus is worthless.
They are in possession of damaged and corroded ordnance that is too dangerous to move - unless you are a suicide bomber who doesn’t give a damn.
He got rid of the problem by saying there was no WMD. It is all they could do after bombing the crap out of Saddam's many WMD facilities and discovering that the bombing made removal very dangerous and impossible to accomplish. Obama got very close to doing the same thing in Syria, but Putin came up with actually a decent plan and the proper disposal of some of Assad's WMD are occurring right now.
Not easy to do. Blowing up WMD only causes dispersal of components and contaminates the site. You need to remove each canister/warhead individually and transport each one to a safe destruction mechanism. We made that just about impossible to do after we bombed the bunkers. You have to work with intact WMD assemblies. Unless of course you are a suicidal terrorist force.
Going in a circle, so bush decided to let everyone think he based a war on a lie when he had the evidence all the time. And he said nothing for tears?
I'm afraid you are correct. This is a huge facility and much of it is too contaminated to examine thoroughly, and because it was that way when first we got there, there is no real guarantee that we even know the complete layout of the place. Worse, that people who did know the place are now allies of ISIS.
For anyone still wondering why we didn't "destroy" the stuff, that turned out to be the work of more than a decade even with the U.S.'s modest stocks in proper containment. And even with the care the Army took, we had leaks during the process. This stuff isn't like that, it's already in the environment of the place, in the walls, the flooring, in the concrete - at the very best the facility is an appalling toxic waste dump.
Much of this can be concocted in a decent laboratory more easily than scrounged from a toxic waste dump, and ISIS just stole half a billion dollars for a war chest. If they want it badly enough they can buy the means to make it. Some of it, however, specifically the VX, is a bit harder to come by. We know Saddam made it. The lethal dose is 17 milligrams on the skin, a small drop, roughly a hundredth of the lethal dose of Sarin. That isn't "weaponizable" or "militarily exploitable," it's a weapon all by itself, ready to go.
The good news is that it's difficult to turn what we do know about into a weapon, or at least most of it. The bad news is what we don't know about.
The unknown unknowns.
Once again, Obama snatches catastrophe out of the jaws of victory.
Placemark.
I’ve read that a large number of the invading illegals are OTMs.
Even if they have 50% potency they could scare an urban center into surrender. It wouldn’t take much. They could use it on the Kurds, the Iranians, Jourdan, Iraq. As a weapon of terror—they have greater value than as a military weapon. They IS are fighting a political terror war (the same way Gengis Khan waged and Tamurlane and the Japanese in China).
It appears however that they do not worship money. They worship a very old book and want to remove the wealthy elites who are running the Middle East. Perhaps they will bankrupt them first. Their leader claims to be the heir apparent to Bin Laden, and ole Bin did want to attack Wall Street to bring down the western money powers aligned with the Middle Eastern money powers.
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
It said the sarin munitions were “of poor quality” and “would largely be degraded after years of storage under the conditions existing there.” It said the tabun-filled containers were all treated with decontamination solution and likely no longer contain any agent, but “the residue of this decontamination would contain cyanides, which would still be a hazard.”
According to the report, Bunker 41 contained 2,000 empty 155-mm artillery shells contaminated with the chemical warfare agent mustard, 605 one-tonne mustard containers with residues, and heavily contaminated construction material. It said the shells could contain mustard residues which can't be used for chemical warfare but “remain highly toxic.”
Well, let's pray that the UN inspectors and America's Traitorous Left are correct that there were/are no WMD in Iraq. It would be ironic if the American Embassy is hit by the so called nonexistent WMD.
ping
@$$HAT libtards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.