Posted on 07/13/2014 1:09:50 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
“try reading a comment in the context it’s offered. the context was that it’s not just women who ought to be carrying.”
The context was guns carried by drunks.
“why didn’t you correct the person who said all women should carry and correct them for not pointing out the exceptions you rip on me for?”
I didnt rip you. I said “Getting stupid drunk is not a good time to carry a gun.” You seem to agree with that so why are you so upset? You must be incredibly thin skinned.
“jerk.”
You really need to work on your social skills.
Very disheartening to read this as I am a Hobart alum. Also read the President’s response and while I understand the frustration he has in that the reporter tended to leave out stuff he seems to miss the point. In a situation like this your processes are secondary and your response shouldn’t focus on trying to prove you did everything you could.
I read a number of the responses in the NY Times and it’s silly how stupid many of they were, particularly those who tried to blame this so-called cover-up on the need to keep making a lot of money to protect the football program.
As one poster noted, Hobart is a VERY small D3 school and the football program generates very little revenue since most of the attending fans are students, who pay little or nothing to go to the games. The team COSTS money, it does not contribute cash flow to the school’s treasury.
The author actually tried to insinuate that the football team is the most popular on campus, which is way off base since the lacrosse program is where the school gets it’s biggest PR impact, having been high-profile for decades.
I will say that in my day (class of ‘80), a few lacrosse players were protected, but from fighting and vandalism, not rape (and ironically they were also Kappa Sigma brothers, so just maybe that fraternity leadership needs to take a look at itself too). And my son goes to school in Tallahassee so the the Winston case is also fresh in my mind. We all know that top athletes tend to get special treatment in high school and college and it’s true that schools need to change their thinking on that.
One thing I noted was that it took the author great effort to note that the first person that tried to intervene was a MALE student friend of the young woman, but that almost comes out grudgingly, as if that would hurt the crusade they were on.
Of course, nowhere in the author’s paradigm does it seem that the young woman should be at least scolded for allowing herself to drink twice the amount of legal driving limits. While keeping yourself under control is no guarantee you won’t become a victim it certainly doesn’t hurt your chances either. With all the efforts that academia has put into so-called anti-rape programs it still comes down to the ability of individuals to not put themselves in a position to be taken advantage of, either physically of mentally. This woman clearly had a self-esteem issue, which she actually admits early in the article by indicating that she wasn’t thin, blonde and wearing expensive clothing.
As for the football players . . . less said the better. Even if consensual you DON’T TAKE ADVANTAGE of a DRUNK WOMAN.
PERIOD.
If you do you have some really low self-esteem of your own and you have no idea of what it truly is to be a man.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.