The Rats political stunt didn't last long.
Collins, Kirk, Murkowski vote with Rats. Sigh
1 posted on
07/16/2014 12:57:54 PM PDT by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
No fan of the RINOs but I suspect they voted yes to force the democrat’s hand at which point Hairy Roid voted NO.
2 posted on
07/16/2014 1:03:14 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin.)
To: jazusamo
Health rights? Abortion is very unhealthy for the baby.
4 posted on
07/16/2014 1:05:55 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: jazusamo
>>>Collins, Kirk, Murkowski vote with Rats. Sigh <<<
Actually, Collinrat, Kirkrat and Murkowskirat voted with the other rats.
Nothing to be surprised at or sigh . . . these are all democrats wearing republican robes, or more correctly - wolves in sheep’s clothing.
5 posted on
07/16/2014 1:06:12 PM PDT by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
To: jazusamo
Well, they didn't say it was a
good plan!
That's why it was Plan B!
8 posted on
07/16/2014 1:10:13 PM PDT by
uglybiker
(nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
To: jazusamo
It worked perfectly. It will come up again in September after normal schedules return as an election time issue to stoke anger among the Sarah Flucke types and drive the angriest horn dogs to the polls.
10 posted on
07/16/2014 1:13:44 PM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(A half-truth is a complete lie)
Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!
11 posted on
07/16/2014 1:14:45 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
Since they are discussing “Women’s Health”, how about this suggestion for preventative medicine. When you lay down cross your legs.
12 posted on
07/16/2014 1:18:57 PM PDT by
billhilly
(Its OK, the left hated Bush.)
To: jazusamo
Harry . . . here is a simple solution, just invoke another nuclear option and make yourself and your party the sole decision making body in America . . . please, please do - and then come November, when WE are the majority we can impeach the whole lot of you including your halfrican boss. We won’t even drag it out!
13 posted on
07/16/2014 1:20:57 PM PDT by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
To: jazusamo
All the RATS have anymore are stunts. Well lies and stunts.
17 posted on
07/16/2014 1:44:58 PM PDT by
uncitizen
(Buckle up! We're on the Facism Fast Track!)
To: jazusamo
This law would give the HHS Secretary, Sylvia Mathews Burwell, a political hack, carte blanche to create and enforce whatever requirements she or Obama want to on insurance companies and private employers (including small businesses). The only exception would be for houses of worship, and the existing, limited accommodation for religiously-affiliated nonprofit organizations would remain.
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which passed the Senate 97-3 and the House unanimously, would be rendered irrelevant beyond individuals. I do not know how this would impact a privately owned business with a single owner. And who knows what would happen with state level religious freedom laws.
18 posted on
07/16/2014 1:59:31 PM PDT by
magellan
To: jazusamo
Avalanche of Awesome!
To: jazusamo
Now there is a big surprise with those 3. NOT!
20 posted on
07/16/2014 2:32:10 PM PDT by
Jean2
(i)
To: jazusamo
Well of course. Any civilized culture kills its young. Every educated, scientifically-minded human being knows and subscribes to that...
Extremists, however, have the audacity to suggest that mothers and babies are not natural enemies.
21 posted on
07/16/2014 3:06:45 PM PDT by
Lexinom
To: jazusamo
Its an essential part of womens health and should be part of an employees package, and not something she has to go and add on later, Sen. Maria Cantwell, Washington Democrat, said. Why do people in Washington State (and yes, it's "people", not just Cantwell) believe that executing children in their mothers' wombs is an essential part of "women's health"? I live in the state; what is about this state that makes people so... murderous?
I realize this is not - directly at least - an abortion-related measure, but it's along the same road with much the same rhetoric. Futhermore, a select few of these drugs are abortifacients and do, in fact, result in the death of a tiny human being, hence the Hobby Lobby case.
22 posted on
07/16/2014 3:10:36 PM PDT by
Lexinom
To: jazusamo
this is the big payback to planned parenthood. if you have to have plans that cover abortion, who does abortions? most hospitals don’t. most abortionists don’t work/have privileges at hospitals.
26 posted on
07/16/2014 7:07:22 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson