Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Atomic Bomb: It Was Always Right
Townhall.com ^ | August 2, 2014 | Larry Provost

Posted on 08/02/2014 8:08:59 AM PDT by Kaslin

This week Major Theodore Van Kirk, the last surviving Veteran of the Enola Gay that dropped the first atomic bomb on Japan, joined the rest of his comrades. His passing is a reminder of why using the atomic bomb was the right thing.

In August 1945 the Allied Powers, led by the United States, were at war with Imperial Japan in the latter days of World War II. Japan would not give up. For every ten thousand Japanese soldiers that were killed by the Allies only a minuscule amount gave up; usually in the single digits.

We were at war because Japan launched war, first against China in 1931, then with another sneak attack against China in 1937, and finally in December 1941 with sneak Japanese attacks against the US at Pearl Harbor and sneak attacks against the United Kingdom and the Netherlands in other areas of the Pacific.

It was during the war that the United States began to develop an atomic bomb, largely in response to the urging of Albert Einstein who warned President Roosevelt, in 1939, about Germany’s attempts to make an atomic weapon.

Japan was a tough enemy. Surrender was seen as more than even disgrace; it was a dishonor to the Japanese Emperor, who was the Japanese God. The Japanese were allies of the Nazis. Comparing the two, the Nazis were evil but also methodical. The Nazis were fanatical about only one thing; the elimination of the Jews, a practice they kept up to the literal ending of the war in Europe in May of 1945. The Germans were a tough enemy but they were, by World War II standards, in their military operations, somewhat practical especially when Hitler was ignored. Germans did surrender by the hundreds of thousands years before the war ended. This was not the case of Imperial Japan and in fact Japanese non surrender got worse the closer we got to the shores of Japan. The Japanese soldier was fighting not just for their buddy, their family, or their homeland; they were fighting for their God.

The United States was inching closer to Japan in early and mid-1945. The island campaigns of Okinawa and Iwo Jima, the latter an island of mere miles, resulted in tens of thousands of casualties. The Japanese began going beyond even fanatical resistance to suicidal resistance by crashing their planes into American ships. Even then there was no hope for Japan. American submarines had nearly run out of targets, having surrounded Japan, and were reduced to shelling fishing boats and even targets on land. American planes were firebombing Japanese cities into oblivion. Japan was alone and starvation was a realistic possibility but they would not give up. Japan would have to be invaded.

Operation Downfall was the code name for the invasion of Japan. It was to be the largest and deadliest military operation of all time. If you saw Saving Private Ryan, the first stage of the invasion of Japan, Operation Olympic, was projected to be twice as large and twice as bloody as the invasion of Europe on D Day. The second stage of the invasion of Japan, Operation Coronet, was to be almost three times as large as D day and with even greater casualties than the first phase of the invasion of Japan.

Unlike D Day, the topographic composition of Japan made the landing locations obvious. Japan knew where we were going to land and they were ready for this last stand. Even children were taught in the ways of the sword and the spear so they could kill at least one American before they too would die for their Emperor. This happened with Japanese children in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and throughout Japan.

To save American and Japanese lives and end the war, President Truman ordered the first atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. Tens of thousands were instantly killed by the bomb dropped from the Enola Gay, the plane navigated by Maj. Van Kirk. The Japanese still did not surrender. Their military council was divided on surrendering. Three days later another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki also killing tens of thousands. More would die of radiation poisoning in years ahead.

The war council still was divided on surrendering but some Japanese officers looked to end the war and asked the Emperor to use his divine authority to stop the killing. The Soviet Union had entered the war against Japan, American planes were destroying what little was left of other Japanese cities, and an American POW told his captors that the next atomic bomb would be dropped on Tokyo.

It took the personal intervention of the Emperor to end the war. Even after their God had intervened and said to the Army that the war must end, some Japanese were not ready to give up. A group of Army officers launched a failed coup against the Emperor, ostensibly to save their God from shame. After the coup failed the Emperor spoke on radio to tell his people to surrender. It was the first time the Japanese people had ever heard his voice. Many of the Japanese soldiers who did not get the word from the Emperor continued to fight in isolated Pacific pockets until the mid-1970’s, almost 30 years after the end of the war.

Any argument from leftist leadership that we should not have used the bombs, against this fanatical an enemy, shows why leftist leadership is not fit to teach our students.

The leftists are fools when it comes to the atomic bomb debate. They argue that the bomb was dropped because of Soviet entry into the war on Japan on August 9, the day Nagasaki was bombed. What the leftists conveniently leave out is that the bomb was shipped to the Pacific before the Soviet Union entered the war against Japan and that the United States asked the Soviet Union to enter the war against Japan.

Another common leftist argument is the bombs were dropped in quick succession in order to stop the Soviet Union from invading Northern Japan. This argument is laughable because the bombs were dropped three days apart and then Truman put a halt on further usage after August 9, leaving five days between the dropping of the second bomb and the end of the war.

Finally, leftists say how could you kill so many people? This is a typical argument from those who have never had to make such a decision as Truman did or other decisions of life and death. Truman was faced with kill now and hopefully end the war or have even more killed on both sides by not using the bomb. (Leftists apparently forget that even their beloved Soviet Union entered the war against Japan. Soviet lives were saved too by Truman.)

This is what leftism does; it plants seeds in people leading them to believe that America is somehow responsible for all the evils in the world, even when America has achieved victory and done well. They will even do it even with World War II, which no sane person can argue with our participation in. They are shameful and are a disgrace to the generation that made it through the Depression and fought, and won, World War II.

Knowing leftist emotion, if the bomb had not been used on Japan, and millions of American casualties occurred, along with tens of millions of Japanese casualties, the leftists would say that we should have used the bomb to alleviate the suffering of the war. Such as the argument of those who were protected by the Enola Gay.

Ask any living soldier from the Pacific, and those were ready to be shipped there from Europe and the USA, who is still alive whether they were happy the bomb was dropped they will respond with “Thank God the bomb was dropped.”

President Truman was an independent thinker and not a man to be pushed around. His desegregation of the armed forces and recognition of the new State of Israel were evidence of that. He was also a combat veteran. He knew the carnage of war and understood that hard decisions need to be made in war.

It will be interesting to see where the history books, backed by their common core allies and government employee teachers, go with teaching the atomic bomb in years ahead. Before all the Veterans of World War II had even begun to die in large numbers, the leftist jargon against usage of the bomb began. They have spared not even Truman, though Truman was a democrat, for their blind rage knows no bounds. It will get worse once all of the generation that made it through the Depression, and won the war, have passed away.

This is why we should, loudly and boldly, teach that it was right to drop the bomb and why. This is why we should honor the military service of Theodore Van Kirk and those who dropped the atomic bombs. They saved the lives of many of our readers, in America, Japan, and elsewhere.

To Major Theodore Van Kirk we say thank you. It was a tough mission, but you can rest well. You saved countless lives. Welcome home from your final mission. Your comrades are waiting.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Japan
KEYWORDS: atomicbombs; cleanupinaisle2; cleanupinaisle7; enolagay; fdr; godsgravesglyphs; hiroshima; ibtz; japan; putinsbuttboys; sovietunion; theodorevankirk; truman; worldwarll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-252 next last
To: Alberta's Child

“Of course not. Japan wasn’t in a position to carry out any serious military threats against the U.S. by the time August of 1945 rolled around. “

Well let’s see- we had George Marshall, Chester Nimitz, Douglas MacArthur, Hap Arnold, Curtis LeMay, not to mention Harry Truman, all of whom had access to what was known about the threat posed by the Japanese military in 1945, versus the military expertise of Albert’s Child.

It’s a tough choice. How will I ever figure out who knows more about the situation in August 1945...


121 posted on 08/02/2014 2:16:46 PM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

“In 1945 Japan was kaput, it was over. No navy = no support for ground troops. The whole “empire” was all separated by ocean. No navy = impotent.”

Really? And why exactly didn’t the American military understand this? Maybe they didn’t have your expertise?


122 posted on 08/02/2014 2:21:49 PM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Quoting from your own entry:

” [W]e can not hope to judge such matters unless we ourselves have been submitted to the same pressures, the same provocations, as these men, whose actions are on trial.”

It is obvious that you have never been in a position of making a decision anywhere near like those which had to be made in WWII.


123 posted on 08/02/2014 2:22:06 PM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

“Take your time,”

We didn’t have ‘time’.


124 posted on 08/02/2014 2:23:59 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Japan was a net importer of food. Starve they would.


125 posted on 08/02/2014 2:30:54 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen
If we had made it the first order of business to finish off the Luftwaffe That’s why that is the way we do things nowadays.

Different gear, different era.

Never had that supremacy over Japan. The enemy always gets a say in strategy. The ground forces would have been protected, the Japs would have went after the fleet, which we would have protected. Just like Okinawa, but now the Japs had a shorter distance to fly. How many Americans would you have sacrificed to not use the bomb?

126 posted on 08/02/2014 2:36:16 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Several years ago, I had the honor of meeting Brig Gen (ret) Paul Tibbets and got his book signed. I believe that some of the other members of his crew were there, too.

I was able to convey my “thanks” to General Tibbets, especially on behalf of my great uncle (now deceased) who was taken and held as a POW in Japan as a 19-year old Marine. Since then, I located post war testimony on the internet where he and others endured beatings lasting 8 hours or more with shovels and leather belts inflicted by their captors along with other maltreatment. Testimony was given by those who were marched off to work details in the morning and returned in the evening and witnessed and spoke of those that they saw this being done to.

It was the right decision then and the right decision now . . . rest in peace, Major Theodore Van Kirk. Your mission on Earth is completed.


127 posted on 08/02/2014 2:59:12 PM PDT by Skybird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen; xone

“What do you think we did on the Continent?
There was AA all over and Luftwaffe all over.”

This would be news to my 94 yr old father. The anti-aircraft battalion he belonged to spent their time on the Continent firing at German infantry and armor because there wasn’t any Luftwaffe to keep them occupied. There had been some Luftwaffe raids when they were on Sicily and Corsica but not much on the Continent.

You don’t see film footage of Luftwaffe attacks on American military columns in France or Germany. You don’t see any portrayed in films like Private Ryan or Band of Brothers. The Luftwaffe spent its resources trying to keep our bombers out of Germany. They did very little in the way of ground support.


128 posted on 08/02/2014 3:09:33 PM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Exactly. It was right.
129 posted on 08/02/2014 3:10:22 PM PDT by patriot08 (NATIVE TEXAN (girl type))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Oddly, I knew his daughter in college.


130 posted on 08/02/2014 3:10:28 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
“Take your time,”

We didn’t have ‘time’.


??? There was no way they could attack the US homeland. Their navy and air forces were wiped out by June/July or so in '45.

They were sitting on their island with defeat inevitable, not a matter of if, but when.

Carriers gone, airplanes mostly gone.

Why risk American lives, why target Japanese civilians en masse ?
131 posted on 08/02/2014 3:28:53 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

“???”

Russia ...


132 posted on 08/02/2014 3:31:17 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
“In 1945 Japan was kaput, it was over. No navy = no support for ground troops. The whole “empire” was all separated by ocean. No navy = impotent.”

Really? And why exactly didn’t the American military understand this? Maybe they didn’t have your expertise?


No, they had orders from the top that were very much affected by top Presidential advisors. Those advisors had longtime careers working for international banking elites which were financing the war, sitting on the boards of the defense contractors, and they would be the ones planning and financing the rebuilding of Japan.

Only the top military had any idea of who was calling the shots; the rest had no idea of the real motivations.
133 posted on 08/02/2014 3:35:50 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: xone
If we had made it the first order of business to finish off the Luftwaffe That’s why that is the way we do things nowadays.

Different gear, different era.

Never had that supremacy over Japan. The enemy always gets a say in strategy. The ground forces would have been protected, the Japs would have went after the fleet, which we would have protected. Just like Okinawa, but now the Japs had a shorter distance to fly. How many Americans would you have sacrificed to not use the bomb?


From wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWII_Battle_of_Japan_%28Air_War%29

"Air combat was most intense in late 1944 and early 1945. Following the first B-29 raids on Tokyo, the number of IJN aircraft assigned to air defense duties was greatly increased and all 12-centimeter (4.7 in) guns were allocated to protect the capital.[192] Fighters stationed to defend Japan's main industrial areas frequently intercepted American air raids between 24 November 1944 and 25 February 1945, and inflicted significant losses for a period. The number of fighters available declined from late January, however.[193] Poor coordination between the IJAAF and IJN also continued to hamper Japan's defensive efforts throughout this period.[194] The Americans suffered few losses from Japanese fighters during the night raids which were conducted from March 1945 until the end of the war.[195]

Resistance to the air raids decreased sharply from April 1945. On 15 April the IJAAF and IJN air defense units were belatedly placed under a single command when the Air General Army was formed under the command of General Masakazu Kawabe, but by this time the fighter force's effectiveness had been greatly reduced due to high rates of casualties in training accidents and combat. Due to the poor standard of the remaining pilots and the deployment of P-51 Mustangs to escort B-29s, the Japanese leadership decided in April to withdraw their remaining fighters from combat. These aircraft were placed in reserve to counterattack the Allied invasion.[196] As a result, few of the subsequent Allied raids were intercepted.[196] The effectiveness of Japanese anti-aircraft batteries also decreased during 1945 as the collapse of the national economy led to severe shortages of ammunition.[196] Moreover, as the anti-aircraft guns were mainly stationed near major industrial areas, many of the raids on small cities were almost unopposed.[197] Imperial General Headquarters decided to resume attacks on Allied bombers from late June, but by this time there were too few fighters available for this change of tactics to have any effect.[198] The number of fighters assigned to the Air General Army peaked at just over 500 during June and July, but most frontline units had relatively few serviceable aircraft.[199] During the last weeks of the war Superfortresses were able to operate with near impunity owing to the weakness of the Japanese air defenses; LeMay later claimed that during this period "it was safer to fly a combat mission over Japan than it was to fly a B-29 training mission back in the United States".[200]

Overall, Japanese fighters shot down 74 B-29s, anti-aircraft guns accounted for a further 54, and 19 were downed by a combination of anti-aircraft guns and fighters. IJAAF and IJN losses during the defense of Japan were 1,450 aircraft in combat and another 2,750 to other causes.[201]"
134 posted on 08/02/2014 3:39:39 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Just because they had no way to win doesn’t mean they were going to surrender. They made us basically commit genocide on Okinawa, and they were prepared to do the same for the homeland. Ready to fight with every single person, they put up posters teaching their people how to build small bombs, make them look like swaddled injured babies, then use them to blow up American GIs. They were then supposed to take the GI’s weapons. The nukes were to show them that if they were going to force us to kill them all we were going to do it from the air and not lose our own people.


135 posted on 08/02/2014 3:40:58 PM PDT by discostu (Villains always blink their eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
An excellent editorial and a worthy companion to John David Lewis' seminal article The Moral Lessons of Hiroshima, which is still at the top of my list of must-reads every August 6th.
136 posted on 08/02/2014 3:52:01 PM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xone; PieterCasparzen; Kaslin; Alberta's Child; Pelham; Gay State Conservative; riverdawg; ...
xone: "Japan was a net importer of food. Starve they would."

Not so much.
I can't find direct numbers, but a little bit of math can still get us there...

In 1943, Japan proper had about 73 million citizens, and imported the equivalent of 2 million tons of rice.
That sounds like a lot, right?
But 73 million active people would eat the equivalent of nearly 50 million tons per year, meaning imports supplied only 4% of their needs.
The rest must come from Japan's home grown production.

The loss of two million tons of imported rice would equate to roughly 100 calories per person per day.

So the Japanese would not starve, period.

They had to be defeated, and the only choice other than A-bomb was invasion.
Given their fanatical resistance, invasion would cost hundreds of thousands of Americans plus millions of Japanese.

So our A-bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki were simply the most merciful way possible to end the war, quickly.

137 posted on 08/02/2014 3:58:49 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Like you said, “...I have yet to see...” How nice for you, an aerie of smug discernment, written large- in the aftermath, of your unbounded freedom from inhuman ideologies. You gave nothing, and received the gift of Freedom. Someday, you will experience “basic” gratitude.


138 posted on 08/02/2014 4:03:23 PM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

“No, they had orders from the top that were very much affected by top Presidential advisors.”

Feel free to name these advisors. And give us the evidence of these orders that were given to senior military officers. Otherwise you are just dealing in conspiracy nonsense that makes claims but never produces anything to back it up.

Anyone who believes that Douglas MacArthur quietly took orders knows little about that man’s life. He wouldn’t even take orders from Harry Truman which is why he was fired during the Korean War. And he wasn’t the slightest bit shy about saying exactly what he thought.

More evidence against your claim are the comments of Admiral William Leahy. Leahy was the most senior active American military officer in WWII, ahead of Marshall, MacArthur, King, Nimitz, Eisenhower, Halsey, the whole bunch. And he happened to think that using the atomic bomb on Japan was wrong, and said that the blockade and conventional bombing were enough to end the war. He makes no mention of others sharing his view, or of this view being suppressed by some unnamed advisors who you believe were in a position to overrule America’s senior military staff in the middle of a major war.


139 posted on 08/02/2014 4:07:43 PM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

One of the things that, curiously I suppose, receives scant attention in discussions like this is what the Japanese Army on the continent was continuing to do to civilian populations; specifically the Chinese civilian population. The casualty numbers show that Chinese civilian casualties would have quickly exceeded, no, eclipsed those of the Japanese at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, had the war continued.

Of course it could be argued that the Chinese had the population to be able to absorb those kinds of losses ...

Also unmentioned is the loss of life, both military and civilian, once the Soviet Red Army tore through the Japanese army on the mainland. The longterm impact to the Japanese population from the loss of so many more young males (on to of those already lost) would be of significant magnitude and would stretch across generations.


140 posted on 08/02/2014 4:32:12 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson