Are you curious?
To: MosesKnows
IOW, they only played at reading it.
2 posted on
01/09/2015 8:49:07 AM PST by
bgill
(CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: MosesKnows
Because that section was rescinded with the passing of the amendments (I think 13 or 14.)
That means, when reading the Constitution, you can and should literally skip that portion.
The Preamble is not part of the Constitution, just as a forward to a book is not part of the book.
3 posted on
01/09/2015 8:49:16 AM PST by
Vermont Lt
(Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
To: MosesKnows
OK. Now can they follow it?
4 posted on
01/09/2015 8:49:49 AM PST by
skeeter
To: MosesKnows
I did not know the Preamble had not been ratified. That being the case, seems to me the “general welfare “”clause”” has no legal standing and all statutes based upon it, including court decisions are null and void.
5 posted on
01/09/2015 8:50:39 AM PST by
Mouton
(The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
To: MosesKnows
Did they read all of Art. II, Sect. 1?
12 posted on
01/09/2015 9:05:50 AM PST by
Ray76
(al Qaeda is in the Oval Office (and John Boehner is their craven servant))
To: MosesKnows
So they read the Constitution. A lot of people read the Bible. That doesn’t mean they follow it.
To: MosesKnows
Now, they will subsequently ignore it.
21 posted on
01/09/2015 11:51:32 AM PST by
Politicalkiddo
("I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson