There are over fifty different Catholic, Jewish, Christian and Islamic prophets. Wouldn’t the rule from Islamists be that all fifty deserve such treatment? Oh, but you never hear that argument. I should note.....a proper Islamist....would note Jesus as a prophet.
If the violence DOES immediately stop, we should be prepared for a war with robots ... or zombies ... or whatever you want to call a faction of humanity (?) that operates by a verbal command with no thought (?) to consider the individual may be correct and the cadre is wrong.
What do you do with the D.I.'s that drill and have drilled for 20 years, young men to kill on command ? .. (f'rinstance)
Do they suddenly stop and say "Whew ... thank God THAT'S all over .... Hey Fred ... wann'a get a beer ?"
I don't think so
No .... the fact that it is being published that the islamic (submissive) world is questioning itself is more dangerous than if it just kept going the way it was.
History is rapidly advancing and we have no time to analyze AS it happens ...
I think we should stop and continue to respond like it HAS been happening.
islam must die .... period ... especially now, if they are indeed 'talking'
Good find
The fat Saudis and the other mohammedan bigwigs might be getting worried about the West spawning some terrorists of its own.
I submit that Western terrorists striking back are likely to be more terrible, and inflict more damage, to more high value targets, than even the muzloid terrorists.
This so-called debate would be classified as an anomaly, don’t expect to hear of it again.
Muslims “debate”.
We die.
Isn’t that nice. I’ll believe it only if the world is free from jihadi violence for 100 years or more.
If the mohammedan clerics feel that the popular feeling against them is getting dangerous then they say all the right things to calm the infidels down while the saracens oil their AKs and adjust their vests.
BINGO!
Islam is based on violence and its history shows their willingness to use it. Islam has a 1400 year history. Over this time the use of violence has been constant. It is those who would have a peaceful Islam that are the anomaly, not the jihadists.
‘After gunmen in Paris killed 12 people, Saudi Arabia’s top body of Muslim clerics quickly condemned the attack and said it could have no acceptable justification.’
Of course the massive anti-Islam German rallies that preceded the slaughter and the massive ‘unity’ [also anti-Muslim, for most participants] had nothing to do with the condemnation.
Actually they had everything to do with it. As long as the West was blamed for any and all Islamic terror, and as long as prominent pols spouted the joint stupidities of, ‘We need to understand the roots of Muslim rage,’ and ‘Islam is a religion of peace,’ there were no quick, unilateral condemnations. It was only after hatred of Islam’s bloody, psychopathic, sadistic, murdering ways started to turn the brand to mud that condemnations of this level and seriousness began.
If we had world leaders with any insight whatsoever, this would be a clue. Unfortunately PC kills clues, along with hordes of innocent people.
Wink wink nod nod