1 posted on
02/17/2015 2:29:24 AM PST by
servo1969
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: servo1969
2 posted on
02/17/2015 2:37:04 AM PST by
Bullish
(Not even a smidgeon of integrity or sanity in this whitehouse.)
To: servo1969
The article even makes sense to me, a woman. However, I must say that the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue is not far off of being Playboy-type magazine. They need to start putting brown wrappers on the covers when on display in stores.
3 posted on
02/17/2015 2:47:13 AM PST by
beachn4fun
(The only hyphen you need...American - or not!)
To: servo1969
Why aren’t romance novels marketed towards men?
Same reason.
4 posted on
02/17/2015 2:50:51 AM PST by
Cowboy Bob
(Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
To: servo1969
Why no men’s swim suit issue?
The tubes are just too big and readers become too unrestrained?
People would rather look at frontal elephant photos.
5 posted on
02/17/2015 3:03:26 AM PST by
Candor7
(Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
To: servo1969
Look at the photos of male Olympic swimmers. Those guys are about as scantily clad as they can get. I would imagine that some of those photos end up in Sports Illustrated. If Ms. Professor wants to see such pics, she is just not looking hard enough - or ignores them because they do not fit in with her preconceived notions, and she cannot express her righteous anger so we can all benefit from her expansive education.
Yes, that was sarcasm.
6 posted on
02/17/2015 3:11:46 AM PST by
mrs. a
(It's a short life but a merry one...)
To: servo1969
Because Sports Illustrated is homophobic. Not only that, they’re trans-haters. Why isn’t there an issue of transwomen, huh?
7 posted on
02/17/2015 3:41:37 AM PST by
Tax-chick
("What does it give you, and what does it keep you from getting?")
To: servo1969
Why no SI swimsuit issue for women with men as models. Only feminist nutjobs ask those sorts of questions. As if they'd buy any issues of SI swimsuits for men.
At the core of the question is the feminist belief that the SI swimsuit issue is degrading to women. I'm sure all the models used in the swimsuit issue were forced to do so at gunpoint? (snicker)
8 posted on
02/17/2015 4:07:38 AM PST by
driftless2
(For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: servo1969
To: servo1969
They wouldn’t meet my price.
12 posted on
02/17/2015 4:23:27 AM PST by
Ken H
(What happens on the internet, stays on the internet.)
To: servo1969
while women who expose themselves to men are either thanked or paid.
True dat!
15 posted on
02/17/2015 4:58:19 AM PST by
Hot Tabasco
(Uncle Sy: "Beavers are like Ninjas, they only come out at night and they're hard to find")
To: servo1969
16 posted on
02/17/2015 5:11:58 AM PST by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
To: servo1969
“Only someone who went to graduate school would say something that foolish.”
LOL. Pretty spot on.
19 posted on
02/17/2015 5:17:35 AM PST by
McGruff
(We are leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq - Barack Obama 2011)
To: servo1969
I was kidding my landlord of my office saying he should write to SI to ask for men modeling swimsuits.
20 posted on
02/17/2015 5:32:46 AM PST by
ExCTCitizen
(I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
To: servo1969
Love Dennis Prager, but he needs to refrain from using the term “gay” to describe homosexual men.
21 posted on
02/17/2015 5:42:14 AM PST by
Bigg Red
(Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
To: servo1969
If a woman wants to look at good looking men in swimsuits or various states of undress, all she has to do is buy Cosmo or one of the thousand other women’s magazines that line the supermarket shelves.
23 posted on
02/17/2015 5:48:49 AM PST by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: servo1969
I opened up one of those popular fashion magazines (cosmo or marie claire or something like that) at the dentist office the other day and was grossed out by a multi page spread of a handsome, sulky looking young man in a variety of ladies clothing - some that were barely covering pertinent detail. Yuk. I guess the subscriber base consists mainly of homos who’d drool over those pictures, but there’s no need for me to open that magazine again. Nothing there but sickness and that doesn’t interest me.
To: servo1969
Women don’t spend much money or time for gawking at men in swim suits, and that leaves homosexual men as the main market, and being, what, 1 or 2 per cent of the population, the issue is not worth the expense.
27 posted on
02/17/2015 7:16:47 AM PST by
Blue Collar Christian
(Ready for Teddy. Cruz, that is. Texas conservative.)
To: servo1969
http://nyc-taxi-drivers-calendar.myshopify.com/
I think this should fill the void.
28 posted on
02/17/2015 7:21:16 AM PST by
thefactor
(yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
To: servo1969
It’s really not even that complicated. The other 51 issues a year all focus on pictures of men, 1 issue a year is women.
30 posted on
02/17/2015 8:17:32 AM PST by
discostu
(The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
To: servo1969
Well, I dunno, SI has gone whole hog for homosexuals in the last year or two.
You'd think they would be all over a fag swimsuit issue!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson