Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California governor orders mandatory water restrictions amid drought
Fox News ^ | 04.01.2015 | AP via Fox News

Posted on 04/01/2015 12:05:51 PM PDT by dware

ECHO LAKE, Calif. – California Gov. Jerry Brown has ordered state officials to impose mandatory water restrictions for the first time in history as the state grapples with a serious drought.

In an executive order issued Wednesday, Brown ordered the state water board to implement reductions in cities and towns to cut usage by 25 percent.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: califdrought; california; drought; water; waterrestrictions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: dware

Guv Moonbeam does absolutely NOTHING to help solve this problem for future generations!!! He’s busy building the high speed train to nowhere, screwing the California farmers and appeasing the growing number of illegal aliens. Why not put lots of people to work, building dams and reservoirs. No, he’ll gasp and whine about “global warming...” while California’s population continues to grow and water continues to dwindle. Must say, the people of California get exactly what they deserve!


41 posted on 04/01/2015 12:41:41 PM PDT by Ranger Warrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Read this post and the one after it.

Wow! Thanks for the links! I knew Israel was a pioneer in desalination but didn't know they were projecting 70% of water supply replacement in 35 years. And there you have it sports fans.

Call me convinced.

It reminds me of something Newt said a few years back. "From 1941 to 1945 we defeated Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and Imperial Japan. Today it takes 23 years to add a 5th runway to the Atlanta airport. We're simply not prepared to be a serious country."

Unfortunately California will never be that serious about the problem. And therefore the desert will reclaim it.

42 posted on 04/01/2015 12:44:01 PM PDT by JPX2011
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
our leaders today have no foresight whatsoever.

But they do have foresight. They are more concerned about the environment, fish and animals than they are about humans. How can you tell? Take a look at Agenda 21, and you'll see the current leadership's foresight.

43 posted on 04/01/2015 12:45:21 PM PDT by dware (The GOP is dead. Long live Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“Despite these hurdles, however, the United States ranks fourth among markets for desalinated water behind Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Spain, according to an International Desalination Association presentation from 2011.”

http://www.bna.com/us-desalination-industry-n17179876105/


44 posted on 04/01/2015 12:46:26 PM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dware

Watch the rate increase as people cut back on their usage ... must have that money ....


45 posted on 04/01/2015 12:47:26 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

That would be environmentally irresponsible. /s


46 posted on 04/01/2015 12:49:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JPX2011

Good thoughts..., thank you.

Newt was right.


47 posted on 04/01/2015 12:50:09 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: dware

I do agree with you there.

You and I both agree we should be prudent when it comes to nature and our resources, but these folks have gone stark raving nuts.

I’m sure we agree there, no doubt.


48 posted on 04/01/2015 12:51:38 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009; DoughtyOne

” dont think a major dam has been built in this country in decades.”

People just don’t give a dam, and too many of them aren’t worth a dam....


49 posted on 04/01/2015 12:53:15 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
You and I both agree we should be prudent when it comes to nature and our resources, but these folks have gone stark raving nuts.

They act as though conservation and caring for the environment is some new concept developed by liberals over the last few years, when in reality, it was engrained in me from the time I was very young and started being introduced to the great outdoors. I can't ever remember a time we didn't "pack it out" and "took only pics, left only tracks" - that's kind of how we roll. We understand that we are stewards of the environment (God told us so in the Bible, right?), and that is where most of our sustenance comes from. We would be idiots to act like the left seems to think we Conservatives do.

And yes, I do agree - leftists, in general, are stark raving mad, as a matter of principle. :)

50 posted on 04/01/2015 12:57:31 PM PDT by dware (The GOP is dead. Long live Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Thanks for the link. Did you notice the word Israel didn’t even appear in the article? You would think it’s percentage of water from desalinization would be somewhat significant, and yet it isn’t even listed.


51 posted on 04/01/2015 1:01:53 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; TexasFreeper2009

Ged ouda here....

LOL


52 posted on 04/01/2015 1:02:52 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Sorry....it was just too easy.


53 posted on 04/01/2015 1:04:43 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I didn’t bother to look into that, and don’t really care about Israel using desalination, since that Middle Eastern country is in it’s own unique situation with costs, water availability, politics and national defense issues, but these figures are from 2011 anyway.


54 posted on 04/01/2015 1:12:10 PM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Hey, I like that type of humor even if a lot of others dump on it. For me, clever is funnier than crass.


55 posted on 04/01/2015 1:12:33 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Crass is never as funny as Klass.


56 posted on 04/01/2015 1:18:05 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I do care, and the reason is that if a small country can absorb the cost, then a large nation should be able to also.

Most folks think desalinization would break the bank. Israel proves it doesn’t. That’s an important object lesson for the public to be aware of.

If Israel can do it, there’s no reason whatsoever why Los Angeles can’t.


57 posted on 04/01/2015 1:22:53 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

One think tank proposal was to take decommissioned nuclear subs, essentially beach them and generate desalinized water from the reactor. That as opposed to dismantling them then storing the reactor parts.


58 posted on 04/01/2015 1:23:58 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Agreed...


59 posted on 04/01/2015 1:24:11 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

What a cool sight that could be, a series of them in a row...

I wonder what the capacity would be, if it would be feasible.


60 posted on 04/01/2015 1:25:47 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson