Posted on 04/28/2015 7:28:00 AM PDT by Rockitz
Monday on Fox Business Network’s “The Willis Report,” host Gerri Willis broke down the charitable spending of the Clinton Foundation.
Willis said, “What if you were to analyze the Clinton Foundation like any charitable organization? That is a question that we’re asking tonight. Does the Clinton Foundation wisely spend charitable dollars? Well the experts weighed in. The answer is a resounding no. One expert even called it a slush fund for the Clintons. These are not politicos. These are charity experts.”
“Charity Navigator, who we have on the show all the time, placed the Clinton Foundation on a watch list,” she continued. “They think there are problems with this non-profit.” She added, “Any Democrat—they say what a wonderful charitable organization it is doing to help people in need, people who are hungry, people who have AIDS. Listen, 6 percent of the money it collected in 2013, 6 percent — $9 million, of the $140 million in total it collected, went to help people.”
Washington Free Beacon’s Liz Harrington weighed in saying, “The numbers just don’t add up. One of the biggest offenses of the Clinton Foundation came out yesterday — 88 percentof the their expenditures go directly to their charitable programs. That is just simply not true. As you mentioned, they raked in $140 million. They only spent nine million on direct aid. Most of their money goes towards salaries, bonuses, to close friends, folks tied to the Clinton campaign.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
How much does a private server inside your own house cost????
cause he’s a Mezvinsky, and ripping off rich people is his family’s business
The Clinton’s will fire those responsible for spending too much of their cash on chairity.
As a Presidential Candidate—is Shrillary required to disclose her tax returns???
The right wing conspiracy is growing by leaps and bounds.
I hope you are right. CNN (which has been instigating rioting) and Hillary must be happy with the Baltimore riots since it keeps her scandals off the top of the news.
How does this information affect the donors?
IF someone makes a sizeable donation & take a CHARITY DEDUCTION on their tax return——does this mean that they are ONLY ENTITLED to 6% deduction of their donation?
This could shake up the Charitable Foundation scams in this country!!!
Someone in Congress needs to look at this....Think of all the past tax money that could be gathered.....
This issue was brought up after Haiti by none other than Bill O’Reilly. Clinton raises it and uses it as a club, but rarely doles it out.
Didn’t prior Clinton tax returns show that Bill takes a charitable deduction for his USED Jockey shorts and socks????
maybe even enough new tax money to pay for Moochelle obama’s new $370,000 WH china
Drive through Chappaqua and you'll see where *some* of it went.Then drive past Chelsea's new $10 million dollar bungalow and you'll see where another bit of it went.
It is a race.. If she can go the distance without being ruined and gain the nomination, she is in and knows it. Once nominated, she WILL win the presidency, from which she can contain ALL the complaints, through her flying monkeys in the media or through the democratic machine’s death grip on government.
Unexpected and unprecedented given that the number used to be 15% last week. How low can it go?
“The right wing conspiracy is growing by leaps and bounds”.
And I for one am proud to be a charter member as are most here at FR.
This reminds me of scam that Lenny Bruce did with charitable donations.
Bruce went door-to-door soliciting donations for a charity and gave 1/3 of the money to a legitimate charity and kept 2/3 of the donations for himself and that was legal. The Clintons can’t even part with 1/3 of their money to a charity.
Of course, I doubt that anyone who donated to the Clintons really expected their money to go to a legitimate charity. I’m guessing that most of the Clinton donators knew that the Clinton Foundation was just a way to launder bribes to the Clinton Crime Family. And those donators are going to be upset if Hillary isn’t elected President and they get nothing for their bribes.
Well you see in the Clinton’s eye’s 99% of it goes to Charity. Don’t you remember the Clinton’s left the white house dead broke. So 1% overhead, 6% goes to other charitable causes and 92% goes to the poor poor Clinton’s
The foundation did take in a lot more contributions than expenses each year, so it's assets have substantially increased.
The David Koch Foundation spent nearly 100% on charitable grants in 2003. Expenses were nearly zero.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.