Krauthammer: Rubio The ‘Perfect Antithesis’ To Hillary, Who Dems ‘Fear The Most’

The Daily Caller ^ | 5-1-15 | Al Weaver

[Diogenesis]

Krauthammer, who supported ObamaCARE,
and then Obama, and then Romney,
is NOTHING BUT A CRIMINAL ENABLER,
a complicit MSM-enabler of all sociopaths.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Ted Cruz is who they fear the most. Not just the media and the Democrats, but also the Democrats in R jerseys.

[TomGuy]

"Purists" and "Homers" as opposed to those who demand "vote for any R because the alternative is worse"?

That voting for any R hasn't worked out so well, has it.

Obama is actually getting better results from the Republican controlled Congress than he got when Reid was Majority Leader.

[vmivol00]

I’d wager to say that most of us on FR would no longer the claim GOP as “our” party. Most of us are conservatives first. If the GOP lines up with us...we will support. If not, we won’t.

Just being “not the Democrat” is not enough to win most true conservative’s vote.

[Taxman]

Actually, Doc, Senator Cruz and Governor Walker are!

Senator Rubio is second tier. I like him, but he is not quite ready for Prime Time!

[Hot Tabasco]

That voting for any R hasn't worked out so well, has it.

You mean the Lack of Voting don't you? After all, it was the stay at Homers that gave us Obama just as the folks who voted for that big eared paranoid crackpot named Ross Perot that gave us Clinton back in 1992..........

[Hot Tabasco]

Most of us are conservatives first. If the GOP lines up with us...we will support. If not, we won’t.

I applaud your comment! So far, folks have said they won't vote for Rubio and instead will vote for Hillary. Others have said they won't vote of Cruz and will stay home. The latest comment is that Scott Walker will never get their vote.........

So you're looking at probably the three most conservative candidates in our party and already people are saying they won't vote for them...........

So who is left to line up with bro????

Like I've said before, it's the Purists and the Homers who will give us another democrap..................

[CyberAnt]

As expected, Krauthammer got his marching orders.

Was somebody expecting him to say differently ..??

And .. for him to say the DemocRATS “fear Rubio the most” is just laughable.

I don’t hear the likes of McCain calling Rubio by the name of “whackobird”.

So .. I will totally discount Krauthammer’s comments.

[SgtHooper]

Yes, definitely a plant.

[TomGuy]

You mean the Lack of Voting don't you?

No, I mean McConnell and Boehner and McCain and Graham and Corker and Cornyn and the similar status quo Republicans.

[Eddie01]

Flawless.

[krunkygirl]

This man needs to retire.

[Hot Tabasco]

No, I mean McConnell and Boehner and McCain and Graham and Corker and Cornyn and the similar status quo Republicans.

I think I miss your point, none of the above are running for president in 2016........I thought I was addressing the current front runners of Cruz, Rubio and Walker and the comments from folks here who say they won't support them in the election if they are nominated.......

Please correct me if I'm wrong......

[conservativejoy]

He’s been hawking for Rubio on the Fox News panel for a good while. I don’t know anyone who is excited by Rubio.

[Elyse]

Lol

[Irish Eyes]

........................................It's time for people to wake up and realize that there is no perfect candidate when it comes to politics and the only objective is to vote for the candidate who is opposing the Democrat party.........

That can not be repeated enough.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Marco Rubio does not have the maturity or judgement to be President. Kraut is really wrong on this one.

[Taxman]

2016 needs to be about ridding the body politic of LIEberals!

Vote AGAINST the Democrats and GOPes, and let us work to create a truly Conservative Party!

[Taxman]

Will being “Not a Democrat” or “Not a RINO” or “Not a GOPe” work?

[BradyLS]

It's time for people to wake up and realize that there is no perfect candidate when it comes to politics and the only objective is to vote for the candidate who is opposing the Democrat party...

Absolutely. Whoever gets the nomination, we're counting on to oppose the Democrats. And we need candidates with track records of them doing that. I have a favorite, but if they don't get the nomination, then the one who beats them better have that track record.

I pulled the handle for Dole, McCain, and Romney. So I am not the stay-at-home type. But how we set ourselves up with these weak candidates who can't beat Democrats that are demonstrably worse continues to amaze me.