Posted on 06/02/2015 5:54:27 PM PDT by maggief
Over a five-year span, senior officials at the National Archives and Records Administrations (NARA) voiced growing alarm about Hillary Clintons record-keeping practices as secretary of state, according to internal documents obtained by Fox News.
During Clintons final days in office, Paul Wester, the director of Modern Records Programs at NARA essentially the agencys chief records custodian privately emailed five NARA colleagues to confide his fear that Clinton would take her official records with her when she left office, in violation of federal statutes.
Referring to a colleague whose full name is unknown, Wester wrote on December 11, 2012: Tom heard (or thought he heard) from the Clinton Library Director that there are or may be plans afoot for taking her records from State to Little Rock." That was a reference to the possibility that Clinton might seek to house her records at the Clinton Presidential Center, which was largely funded by the Clinton Foundation.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Time for a Special Prosecutor.
Congress, are you awake?
I find it incredibly hard to understand how Denny Hastert is under indictment, but the Clintons are not even being investigated.
Stinks to High Heaven.
I wonder if Yoko Ono, her previous lover is on her contact list.
“We met many times during the New York Vietnam War protests in the 1970s, and became very intimate. We shared many of the same values about sexual equality, fighting against the authoritarian, patriarchal, male-dominated society we were raised in she explained.
We had a brief romantic fling when I lived with John in Manhattan and Hillary was studying at Yale, but eventually we lost touch. I am amazed how things are going well for her and wish her the best for her campaign she told reporters during the press conference.
you think after all these years this would be self explanatory! /s
Excellent point.
Hild on just a momene
ººººººººººººººººººººººººº
Dear Mrs Clinton
“.....Clinton would take her official records with her when she left office, in violation of federal statutes....”
surely you must be aware of that..violation of federal statutes MEANS?
Time to fess up and get this thing over with
Sincerely
M.M.
__________
the Republican Candidate for POTUS..will be all too aware of these peoples shenanigans...come 2016. Hillary can not possibly face aNYONE knowing that they know what’s she’s done
I therefore predict that she is in fact ALREADY DONE!!!
Stick a fork in her!
she wont even be able to control who she rubs shoulders woth on that ple Campaign Trail.....for very much longer.
oh so sad!
"Hey ... stop that ... I mean it ... you can't ... hey ... c'mon ... really ... come back ... hey ..."
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
“I wonder if Yoko Ono, her previous lover is on her contact list.”
World News Daily Report is the source of that “story.”
No matter how plausible we believe this is, a.d how possible it might be,.that site actually tells readers that it makes up “news” in a disclaimer on its site. You were sucker punched.
That is part of the fun of reading their “news.”
Private Emails Reveal Ex-Clinton Aides Secret Spy Network
Emails disclosed by a hacker show a close family friend was funneling intelligence about the crisis in Libya directly to the Secretary of States private account starting before the Benghazi attack.
by Jeff Gerth, ProPublica, and Sam Biddle, Gawker, March 27, 2015
This story was co-published with Gawker.
Starting weeks before Islamic militants attacked the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya, longtime Clinton family confidante Sidney Blumenthal supplied intelligence to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gathered by a secret network that included a former CIA clandestine service officer, according to hacked emails from Blumenthals account.
(snip)
(Cody) Shearer said only that the FBI is involved and told me not to talk. There is a massive investigation of the hack and all the resulting information.
(snip)
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
BTTT
The fact that she *had* the private server and didn't deny it means she's guilty of breaking federal law, and belongs in prison as a consequence.
There is no comparison. Hastert should have been incarcerated as a child molester years ago. He literally got away with diddling high school students while he was a teacher. That is a horrible thing.
I am not defending Clinton at all.
They both will get away with crimes and no one seems to care.
That’s fine. I realize that Hastert is evil, however, so are the Clintons, just in different ways.
Hastert, as far as I know, has not been charged with the crimes you mentioned at this point, he has been charged with other crimes that the Clintons seems to have also engaged in, yet they are under no investigation and will not be investigated.
They are untouchable, and that is a crock of horsesh!t in my mind.
Don’t disagree.
The Hastert thing is confusing to a lot of folks. He’s been indicted on some pretty obscure charges, to be sure. But the facts are that he was paying someone to be quiet about a “sex scandal” from years ago-and the statute of limitations has run out on those crimes.
There really doesn’t seem to be much discussion about what this guy really did.
I don’t get why people around here (FR) are not screaming bloody murder.
I had read over this past weekend that it involved gay sex with a former student, so yeah, it’s disgusting to say the least.
Then that information seems to have evaporated, and I heard Rush talking about this situation on Monday saying “Whatever he did”, and I was like. C’mon Rush... I think you know what he did.
I further think that the person blackmailing Hastert is also committing a crime in extortion and should be charged, and I am curious why that is not the case.
However, I am more curious that if Hastert is charged with structuring crimes as they relate to suspicious money moving... why on Earth are the Clintons not charged with the same? or even under any sort of investigation at all?
That is really bugging me. They are so obviously corrupt, yet seemingly able to do whatever they want.
I guess I was.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.