I see the Naziettes are in full defense mode
Concentrated triage to stem the bloodletting, to exact revenge, and to stop any forthcoming release of further revelations.
From my perspective, this sequence is just the tip of the iceberg and their is much, much more in hand to reveal. Probably game-changing with respect to 2016.
Another politician deathly afraid of militant fangtooth feminazis.
The manhaters get their way or they make you suffer.
Bureaucrats and government officials want Lamborghini’s too ya know........
These people REALLY hate it when evil is exposed.
We should be surrounding their homes and offices and daring them to come out.
Kamala’s job is to try and protect the child butchers by keeping a lid on things, and also threat of prosecution.
Supreme Court Justice Brandeis made his famous statement that “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants” in a 1913 Harper’s Weekly article, entitled “What Publicity Can Do.”
`Brandeis and the History of Transparency’
Transparency, `rats, let’s see it all. Bring it on.
5 people to add to the list of those who must be investigated for crimes against humanity when the war is over.
Female version of Obunghole.
....But, Hey, Kammie, no problem with law breakers invading our country, huh!
Meet me at Pier14 Ms Harris.
Blacks lead in abortions per capita; she’s racist against her race.
Leftist totalitarian thugs...
Bizarro world.
Oh, no... it’s not political. /S
Yeah ..... Assist those that murder babies and punish those that try and stop the murder of babies. That’s so socialist democratic of this POS attorney generalissimo ...... Doom on her and her agenda.
She’s competing for the 2015 Margaret Sanger Racial Purity Through Abortion Award.
Watch and see...federal agents will descend on this little non-profit for some obscure tax issue. Then, the public will not get the truth. Hopefully they made many copies of this “modern form of Molech worship to get a Lamborghini” so it sees the light of day
Under California Law Penal Code § 632:
632. (a) Every person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, by means of any electronic amplifying or recording device, eavesdrops upon or records the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the person has previously been convicted of a violation of this section or Section 631, 632.5, 632.6, 632.7, or 636, the person shall be punished by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment.By having the discussion in a restaurant, there could be no expectation of not being overheard, and so no "confidential communication"(b) The term "person" includes an individual, business association, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, or other legal entity, and an individual acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of any government or subdivision thereof, whether federal, state, or local, but excludes an individual known by all parties to a confidential communication to be overhearing or recording the communication.
(c) The term "confidential communication" includes any communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties thereto, but excludes a communication made in a public gathering or in any legislative, judicial, executive or administrative proceeding open to the public, or in any other circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded.