Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ISIS planning ‘nuclear tsunami’
Washington Times ^ | 9/28/15 | L, Todd Woods

Posted on 09/29/2015 8:41:13 AM PDT by Kartographer

Nuclear annihilation across the globe. This is what a German reporter who successfully embedded with the Islamic State says the terror group is planning. Jurgen Todenhofer released his findings in a book titled “Inside IS - Ten Days in the Islamic State,” reports the UK’s Daily Express.

“The terrorists plan on killing several hundred million people. The west is drastically underestimating the power of ISIS. ISIS intends to get its hands on nuclear weapons,” says Todenhofer, calling the group a “nuclear tsunami preparing the largest religious cleansing in history.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: isisnuclear; isisnuclearterror; isisterrorthreat; isisthreat; jurgentodenhofer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
These people there is no Assured Mutual Destruction fears they embrace death and their belief in the paradise that awaits them.
1 posted on 09/29/2015 8:41:13 AM PDT by Kartographer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

I’d say N Korea will be the vendor.


2 posted on 09/29/2015 8:44:12 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Therefore, 0bama is focused on ridding the world of ....

.... Assad.


3 posted on 09/29/2015 8:44:13 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Imagine the GOPe spending half as much energy attacking liberals as they do conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Would be great if we had a Non-Muslim pro-American conservative president leading the world right about now...


4 posted on 09/29/2015 8:45:57 AM PDT by petercooper (And I was born in the back seat of a Greyhound bus... Rollin' down Highway 41.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Since 1945, the nuclear paradigm has been that you don’t have to use nuclear weapons, you just have to have them. Every nation state that possessed nuclear weapons didn’t really want to use them.

That has changed. ISIS would gladly use them. I believe Iran will use them, too, but not against Russia or China. Only against us, mainly because they think we would not retailiate. We lack the political will, and they are probably right.


5 posted on 09/29/2015 8:46:17 AM PDT by henkster (Liberals forget Dickens' kids forged an Empire on which the sun never set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

This doesn’t shock me one bit. Liberals are in denial about it and obama is complicit in it.


6 posted on 09/29/2015 8:46:37 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Chris Stevens won't be running for president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Vlad Putin is going to see to it they’re no longer around by Valentine’s Day.


7 posted on 09/29/2015 8:46:42 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

I believe this is exactly what soebarkha wants.


8 posted on 09/29/2015 8:47:17 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
there is no Assured Mutual Destruction...

More like PMD, Preferred Mutual Destruction. They don't even require bulldozers, as the Saudi's needed a few days ago.

9 posted on 09/29/2015 8:47:35 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

“Therefore, 0bama is focused on ridding the world of ....
.... Assad.”

He is also cleaning up our air so it will be clean when the ISIS nuclear bomb goes off in this country. Thank goodness, I wouldn’t want to die in dirty air. :o)


10 posted on 09/29/2015 8:49:49 AM PDT by Marcella (CRUZ (Prepping can save you life today.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Liberal minded people never wake up until reality has cut some of their throats.


11 posted on 09/29/2015 8:51:35 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

It's a bucket loader, not a bulldozer...............

12 posted on 09/29/2015 8:52:20 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

ISIS planning ‘nuclear tsunami’...? Very real threat if we don’t get liberals out of the way...


13 posted on 09/29/2015 8:55:48 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I made the same point about the original story. These are the same people who call any armored vehicle a tank. They demonstrate they do not know what they are talking about, and that whatever they say is therefore suspect.


14 posted on 09/29/2015 8:56:09 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Thanks for the correction. Kinda like this one...


15 posted on 09/29/2015 8:56:48 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Well thank God we have such a capable President to lead us.....NOT!


16 posted on 09/29/2015 8:57:35 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

This is an old story - I think it first appeared some months ago - the reporter was even interviewed on TV.

Bringing Armageddon is their mission. Nuyinga nuke from Pakistan, N Korea, or Iran is the plan, (unless Barry gives them one first).


17 posted on 09/29/2015 8:59:50 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
Harry Truman understood what was necessary:

"The weapon is to be used against Japan between now and August 10th. I have told the Sec. of War, Mr. Stimson, to use it so that military objectives and soldiers and sailors are the target and not women and children. Even if the Japs are savages, ruthless, merciless and fanatic, we as the leader of the world for the common welfare cannot drop this terrible bomb on the old capital or the new [Kyoto or Tokyo].

"The Japanese began the war from the air at Pearl Harbor. They have been repaid many fold.

"If they do not now accept our terms they may expect a rain of ruin from the air, the like of which has never been seen on this earth." (Public Papers of the Presidents, Harry S. Truman, 1945, pg. 197, 199).

"The world will note that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, a military base. That was because we wished in this first attack to avoid, insofar as possible, the killing of civilians. But that attack is only a warning of things to come. If Japan does not surrender, bombs will have to be dropped on her war industries and, unfortunately, thousands of civilian lives will be lost.

"Having found the bomb we have used it. We have used it against those who attacked us without warning at Pearl Harbor, against those who have starved and beaten and executed American prisoners of war, against those who have abandoned all pretense of obeying international laws of warfare. We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.

"We shall continue to use it until we completely destroy Japan's power to make war. Only a Japanese surrender will stop us." (Public Papers of the Presidents, Harry S. Truman, 1945, pg. 212).


18 posted on 09/29/2015 9:01:00 AM PDT by Daffynition (*We are not descended from fearful men*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Common mistake, everybody makes.................


19 posted on 09/29/2015 9:03:56 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: henkster

Obama made a statement about absorbing a terrorist attack. It’s at the link. What he should have said is we’ll kick ass if we get hit again. It’ll be substantially more dangerous if not impossible to hit back at Iran after the agreement than before it. Think about Obama’s response to the North Korean sinking of the Chonan; a strongly worded protest.

https://books.google.com/books?id=WSdzAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA154&lpg=PA154&dq=obama+would+absorb+nuclear+terrorist+attack&source=bl&ots=iUpMH7-g1L&sig=KCJ8-HEZbgyX1NHVF0iGBDWDczw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CC4Q6AEwA2oVChMI0_La186cyAIViYwNCh1b8weo#v=onepage&q=obama%20would%20absorb%20nuclear%20terrorist%20attack&f=false


20 posted on 09/29/2015 9:04:38 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson