Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz Citizenship Kerfuffle Is a Distraction
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | January 7, 2016 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/07/2016 11:20:55 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

1 posted on 01/07/2016 11:20:55 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Awaiting the imminent arrival of the usual frantic and panicked anti-Cruz jihadists.


2 posted on 01/07/2016 11:22:33 AM PST by House Atreides (Cruzin' and Trumpin' or losin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Trump wants the media talking about Cruz’s NBC and not his character and platform. On NBC Trump is has an advantage with two parents both citizens, on character and platform...advantage Cruz.


3 posted on 01/07/2016 11:27:51 AM PST by DaveyB (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I would like to see the matter settled once and for all but I don’t think it will be. Either you are a natural-born citizen or you are not.


4 posted on 01/07/2016 11:43:51 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Would someone explain why the Cruz citizenship issue is so complex. Unlike Obama, where fraudulent birth certificate accusations muddied the waters, all of Cruz’s and our country’s documentation is out in the open.

Guess something’s ambiguous in our Constitution. The explanations out there are all long and there are a lot of them. Why the fog?


5 posted on 01/07/2016 11:58:23 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

Sure. I’ll explain it. Ted Cruz is a statutory citizen-at-birth. He is not a citizen under the 14th Amendment. The courts have never ruled explicitly on whether or not a statutory citizen-at-birth is the legal equivalent of a natural-born citizen under the Constitution, which is required for eligibility to the presidency.

I believe the courts would rule in his favor, but the issue is not “settled law” as some conservative pundits claim.


6 posted on 01/07/2016 12:05:20 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Is a man who refuses to understand the law on an issue
qualified to be president.

You’d think with all his attorneys and with the case he
tried to make about Obama he would get it by now.


7 posted on 01/07/2016 12:20:28 PM PST by Calpublican (A.G. Lynch: The intent of this statement is to incite violence against radical Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Anyone deemed to be a natural born citizen by Congressional statute is Constitutionally a NBC. The Constitution gave Congress sole authority to define citizenship in the Citizenship Clause.


8 posted on 01/07/2016 12:21:31 PM PST by conservativejoy (Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God ...We Can Elect Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DaveyB
“Trump wants the media talking about Cruz's NBC and not his character and platform.”

And its worked. If it was Hillary spurring the media on like this against Cruz, we'd be calling them her lap-dogs...

9 posted on 01/07/2016 12:21:36 PM PST by IAMNO1 (Enough with the divisions. Lets get somebody in there who'll fix this mess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Redo your research. The SCOTUS has already ruled on this.

We have had numerous candidates who have not been born in the US. e.g. Geo. Romney born in Mexico.


10 posted on 01/07/2016 12:23:01 PM PST by Calpublican (A.G. Lynch: The intent of this statement is to incite violence against radical Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Trump just raising this so we won’t notice he
is in over his head. He cannot best Cruz in any
head to head confrontation because most of the time
Trump is winging it.


11 posted on 01/07/2016 12:24:40 PM PST by Calpublican (A.G. Lynch: The intent of this statement is to incite violence against radical Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012; cymbeline

It’s been settled which is why Mexican-born Geo. Romney was
about the run for president.

Just because Trump is pretending it’s so does not make it so.


12 posted on 01/07/2016 12:27:19 PM PST by Calpublican (A.G. Lynch: The intent of this statement is to incite violence against radical Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
I would like to see the matter settled once and for all

It would seem to benefit Cruz to have it brought out into the open and settled for once and all.

It would certainly be worse if this issue was raised right before the election and it was Cruz vs. Hillary.

13 posted on 01/07/2016 12:28:07 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Exactly, and why did he have his records sealed if he has nothing to hide? If he’s legible, then get it out there and over and done with. Just because he says so, doesn’t make it so, and we need to see his mother’s birth certificate too - maybe she wasn’t even born in the USA herself - maybe she is also Canadian born and thus, the reason for him sealing his records. See, how people think? This isn’t a distraction - it is something that needs to be settled.


14 posted on 01/07/2016 12:30:37 PM PST by Catsrus (I callz 'em as I seez 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

I agree that Congress has such authority. SCOTUS has not, however, issued an opinion on the matter of those born abroad to citizen parents.


15 posted on 01/07/2016 12:31:34 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Every last DU member is probably canceling their cable/dish subscriptions because these silly threads are all the entertainment they need.


16 posted on 01/07/2016 12:31:55 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
It would seem to benefit Cruz to have it brought out into the open and settled for once and all.

Yeah like the court system would get this done before the election. Not.

17 posted on 01/07/2016 12:32:56 PM PST by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
What's the issue? The same men who wrote the Constitution also wrote this 1n a 1790 law:

The Act also establishes the United States citizenship of certain children of citizens, born abroad, without the need for naturalization: "the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens".

Since the Constitution gave Congress the authority to make that ruling, where is the issue?

18 posted on 01/07/2016 12:35:29 PM PST by conservativejoy (Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God ...We Can Elect Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican
Redo your research. The SCOTUS has already ruled on this.

No need. My research is quite current and correct. SCOTUS has never ruled on it.

According to the Foreign Affairs manual published by the U.S. Department of State, statutory citizenship (i.e. granted by U.S. statute at birth) may or may not be equivalent to natural-born citizenship under the U.S. Constitution.

7 FAM 1131.6-2 Eligibility for Presidency
(TL:CON-68; 04-01-1998)

a. It has never been determined definitively by a court whether a person who acquired U.S. citizenship by birth abroad to U.S. citizens is a natural born citizen within the meaning of Article II of the Constitution and, therefore, eligible for the Presidency.

(...)

d. (snip) In any event, the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statute does not necessarily imply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes.


19 posted on 01/07/2016 12:36:00 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline
Why the fog?

Because the media can use the fog to obscure the issues. The 'fog' is the normal everyday citizen's ignorance of every detail of the Constitution and the Laws of Naturalization and Immigration.

Just go out and ask the average person on the street if Cruz's Dad was born in the US. Or his Mom. Ask another person if the Dad was born in Canada, or the Mom. Ask them where Cruz was born. Ask them if he ever had a Canadian passport.

Ask them if Ted was born in Cuba. (bet you get some yes's). Then ask them if their answers mean that Cruz is, or is not a NBC according to US Law.

It's like that 'survey' where they asked if we should bomb Agrabah. Do you think we should, or shouldn't ?

20 posted on 01/07/2016 12:38:04 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson