Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativejoy

I agree that Congress has such authority. SCOTUS has not, however, issued an opinion on the matter of those born abroad to citizen parents.


15 posted on 01/07/2016 12:31:34 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
What's the issue? The same men who wrote the Constitution also wrote this 1n a 1790 law:

The Act also establishes the United States citizenship of certain children of citizens, born abroad, without the need for naturalization: "the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens".

Since the Constitution gave Congress the authority to make that ruling, where is the issue?

18 posted on 01/07/2016 12:35:29 PM PST by conservativejoy (Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God ...We Can Elect Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

They have not issued an opinion; however:
The Supreme Court has long recognized that two particularly useful sources in understanding constitutional terms are British common law3×

Both confirm that the original meaning of the phrase “natural born Citizen” includes persons born abroad who are citizens from birth based on the citizenship of a parent.

Used in Smitgh vs Alabama and other cases.


33 posted on 01/07/2016 1:04:12 PM PST by Calpublican (A.G. Lynch: The intent of this statement is to incite violence against radical Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson