Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US to collect equal pay data from all big employers
Associated Press ^ | Jan 29, 2016 12:02 AM EST | Josh Lederman

Posted on 01/28/2016 9:18:46 PM PST by Olog-hai

The Obama administration is expanding a data collection program aimed at ferreting out abuses of equal pay laws.

President Barack Obama in 2014 directed the Labor Department to collect data from federal contractors about what they pay employees, sorted by gender, race and ethnicity. Obama's new proposal will cover all businesses with 100 or more employees, regardless of whether they contract with the government. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission will collect the data. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; communism; equalpay; liberalagenda; obama; socialism; tyranny

1 posted on 01/28/2016 9:18:47 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Will they be “binary” and collect gender data based on male and female? We have been told there are over 50 different gender identities. Will the government data collectors be liberal and divide the data into all these categories??? If not then they are bigoted and committed to an outdated archaic idea of only two sexes male and female. We can’t have that in today’s world...,.....


2 posted on 01/28/2016 9:21:51 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This is not a job delegated to the current regime in the U.S. Constitution. Employers need to tell these bottom feeding politicians to get lost.


3 posted on 01/28/2016 9:22:35 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Jonas the Snow Monster survivors need to embrace global warming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

So the 4th and 5th amendments are officially dead? That’s what happens when you start down that slippery slope, like we did when Cruz supporters decided it was OK to ignore Section 1 of Article Two.


4 posted on 01/28/2016 9:31:50 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - losers are not winners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

the feds want internal financial data?! excuse me??

sorry, private corporations are private. regardless of the size.

the ONLY thing allowing the feds to have ANY financial data on a corporation is if it’s publicly traded.

if it’s private, they can get stuffed.

just another reason to never form any corporation in the US


5 posted on 01/28/2016 9:32:29 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I refuse to answer or supply said information on the grounds that it might incriminate me!


6 posted on 01/28/2016 9:33:32 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (how many laws has Cruz sponsored that have become law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

This thread ain’t about the birther thing, WADR.


7 posted on 01/28/2016 9:35:50 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer; All
"This is not a job delegated to the current regime in the U.S. Constitution."

Exactly !

The only sex-related right that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect is voting rights as evidenced by the 19th Amendment.

Otherwise, not only have the states never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to police INTRAstate pay equality as you have indicated, but a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate INTRAstate commerce. This is evidence by the following excerpt.

”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” - Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

And Obama does not deserve to be singled out.

More specifically, although Congress has always had the constitutional authority to stop Obama dead in his tracks with respect to his unconstitutional actions, corrupt Congress has stubbornly refused to do so. So the RINO-controlled, do-nothing Congress is actually condoning lawless Obamas actions imo.

Remember in November !

When patriots elect Trump, or whatever conservative they elect, they need to also elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will work within its Constitutional, Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support the new president.

Also, consider that such a Congress would probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.

8 posted on 01/28/2016 10:04:03 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This did not apply to the women in Hillary Clinton’s office.

A bunch of lip service from Democrats, nothing more.


9 posted on 01/28/2016 11:10:36 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Obama is more supportive of Iran's right to defend its territorial borders than he is of the USA's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

he’s using the federal contractor loophole again. he can pretty much demand whatever he wants out of companies if they want federal contracts.


10 posted on 01/28/2016 11:21:58 PM PST by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

That’s right; those companies become pseudo-government agencies, and have to put the requisite number of dead-wood preferred minorities on their payrolls (at all levels, regardless of qualifications). When my company started doing this (primarily with white women who were barely working the minimum hours), I (and other guys) stepped back and reduced my own hours. I don’t make a ton of money, but I’ve never had as high an hourly wage in my life and I have a much better work/life balance. The company can do nothing about it because it is too easy to document discrepancies in hours worked (ain’t technology great?).


11 posted on 01/29/2016 3:25:05 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Solution: Fire black janitors if you have a higher percentage of blacks in that low-pay field.


12 posted on 01/29/2016 4:05:44 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie
read again. that was his original method.

now it's 'all businesses with 100 or more employees, regardless of whether they contract with the government' (or not)

13 posted on 01/29/2016 8:39:47 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson