Posted on 02/01/2016 2:21:52 PM PST by TBP
This is ridiculous. Not the point at all but if it rings your bells go with it.
If they actually used his words, not words selected to slant the story, then he’d have no trouble with it. The media lies like a rug; we all know it. How come only with Trump you decide they are telling the truth?
They are damaging our country with their slanted coverage, not the Trump coverage but all the coverage, massaging the stories and hiding those they don’t want heard.
They deserve to be called out and Trump has done just that. They know when they lie about him there will be consequences.
This “sounds” like heading towards an all-nanny state, but it doesn’t HAVE to. It depends on what gets successfully presented to Donald.
I’d like to see the church charity paradigm come back to the point that donations could be tax CREDITS (up to tax due for the period) not just deductions. They surely can’t use the money any MORE unwisely than a government medical nanny would.
Safety nets don’t have to be Caesar all the time. Just sayin’.
I agree. The closer to the community level the better. Perhaps a State coordination that refers people to local saftey nets in their area.
Heaven forbid anyone stand up for themselves! Conservatives have professed for years that they wish GWB had and that McCain and Romney didn’t defend themselves but criticize Trump for doing so. Confusing to say the least.
I want.. the cry of a certain age bracket.
no offence meant but there must be a better way of saying the goals you have.
Wow, that site is a mess. It shut down my Internet Explorer a couple of times.
That's exactly the problem.
The way this is phrased, that's dangerous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.