Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws
Trump loses by reacting.

I just don't agree. People need to be aware of who cruz is and what he considers acceptable.
14 posted on 02/03/2016 6:45:34 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - losers are not winners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: JoSixChip

Furthermore Trump was defending his turf.

We need Trump to defend America.

Trump defends his Turf, he’ll defend America.


35 posted on 02/03/2016 6:49:14 PM PST by Eddie01 (If you burnin' bandwidth with your mind, find time to pay the organ grind - Donate to FreeRepublc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: JoSixChip

I agree, and what most people don’t seem to grasp, is what a “spoiler” is, this is not about what votes Trump lost, or Cruz, or others got, rather what votes would have gone to the good Doctor, that would NOT have gone to other candidates. This was a close contest, and 5% of Iowa voters as a result did not vote as they had wanted because of incorrect news being filtered thru the Caucases. I am not saying the results would not be the same, but I suspect that things would have been even closer, and MAYBE different. The devil is in the details, and IF this was premeditated, and I am not saying it is, but IF it is, it is an early indicator of things for the long run.


90 posted on 02/03/2016 6:59:26 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: JoSixChip

I agree, and what most people don’t seem to grasp, is what a “spoiler” is, this is not about what votes Trump lost, or Cruz, or others got, rather what votes would have gone to the good Doctor, that would NOT have gone to other candidates. This was a close contest, and 5% of Iowa voters as a result did not vote as they had wanted because of incorrect news being filtered thru the Caucases. I am not saying the results would not be the same, but I suspect that things would have been even closer, and MAYBE different. The devil is in the details, and IF this was premeditated, and I am not saying it is, but IF it is, it is an early indicator of things for the long run.


91 posted on 02/03/2016 6:59:48 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: JoSixChip

I just don’t agree. People need to be aware of who cruz is and what he considers acceptable.
.................................................
I agree with you. When is this tolerance for cheating and lying going to stop? Accepting more of the same and even more of the same makes one hell of a nice example for our children doesn’t it?
Politics is dirty enough without going along with it because it costs another minute of time to disagree! Cruz is scum!


143 posted on 02/03/2016 7:15:06 PM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: JoSixChip

Yet you think You Trump should be president totally unvetted? His anti-Christian antics should be covered up?


185 posted on 02/03/2016 7:38:50 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: JoSixChip

I find it funny that you use Rove to support your candidate. I guess it is just more evidence that Trump truly is the big ESTABLISHMENT candidate!! Down with the establishment!


533 posted on 02/04/2016 8:06:27 AM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson