Posted on 03/09/2016 7:29:47 PM PST by UMCRevMom@aol.com
Thank you for the “ss” advice. It works. I just downloaded the video smoothly. No problem. I use Epic browser.
The BLM owning land, as opposed to states owning it, is different from persecution of ranchers doing a controlled burn.
You'd probably have to get the ear of one of Trump's trusted advisors, and have them explain the situation first: but I bet he'd actually listen, once that happened.
Its pretty slick,I found it somewhere a while ago.
Back to the thread.
See youtube video at # 16 .... ties to Harry Reid !
Or here:
Thanks, Wildhighlander57.
What if someday, this site is outlawed? What if it is a Hate CRIME to converse online with other conservatives? Do we just obey ? When do we cross that line?
Trespassing is a Lifetime Jail Sentence?
Sounds like Cruel and Unusual Punishment to me.
Thanks. This is an atrocity. I’d like to see the specific charges. There’s no mention arnoldlawfirm.com - the lawyer the Bundy hired.
BO’B and ValJar are attempting to push the red button on WTP. Info Wars just tonight showed the film clip of LaVoy being murdered by BO’Bs regime personnel. The EPA, FBI, BLM and BO’B are walking close to the edge.
Would he? He was siding with the gov’t on this.
The video is NOT properly syncronized. The position of Finnicum’s body when the shots are fired does NOT match the coroner’s report. The shot’s were fired earlier than the video indicates.
You talking about Custer???
So you're saying we must, even though they (the US Federales) don't in numerous examples, right?
Thanks for the story. I read the mainstream media version earlier.
Defense lawyers say they are being sandbagged on discovery when it comes to evidence that was collected in the case.
Sounds like a dirty business of exaggerated charges and government abuse of power and lying and hiding of evidence.
It was a protest where some occupancy law and a refusal to follow the instructions of law enforcement. They had guns but didn’t shoot anyone. The only fatally was the likely murder of a protest spokesman. They get life.
BLM protest leaders were invited to the White House after multi city riots which destroyed many millions of dollars of property, ruined the businesses of their neighbors and which has resulted in the murders and targeting of police and a skyrocketing increase in black on black murders.
No justice no peace should be our battle cry.
Oooo, the handwave assertion. Gosh, I'm so impressed. It doesn't fit his record.
The BLM owning land, as opposed to states owning it, is different from persecution of ranchers doing a controlled burn.
You are WAY out of your league here. The BLM doesn't own land; it manages it as a Federal agency. I've written three books on environmental policy and political corruption in government land management. So give it a rest and admit you blew it. OK? You're dead wrong here.
Trump is unlikely to do diddly about the EPA because he doesn't understand the technical, economic, and legal issues AT ALL. Nor is he predisposed toward limited Constitutional government.
bkmk
Hmm. Princeton degree, Harvard Law, Bush administration, US Senate. Hardly an outsider.
You are WAY out of your league here. The BLM doesn't own land; it manages it as a Federal agency. I've written three books on environmental policy and political corruption in government land management. So give it a rest and admit you blew it. OK? You're dead wrong here.
It's worse than that: not only do I not know a lot about the issues: it was a desultory effort, since I don't care passionately about this issue. I think it sucked that Clinton signed the EO he did which prevented extraction of coal from (IIRC) lands in Utah, allowing that Indonesian family to clean up. I think it sucks that whoever it is, got their green panties in a wad to refuse to allow controlled burns, preferring to allow nature to run its course, upon which Yellowstone and environs had catastrophic forest fires. I vaguely get the impression, that the Feds are trying to keep people from grazing cattle on otherwise barren Federal Land, just so they can get their rocks off: similar to the fuss over drilling in ANWR which is so desolate that even the mosquitos in Alaska consider it to be out of tha way.
That being said:
If the government is being unreasonable,and the courts are backing them up, what is the best approach for an aggrieved rancher / water user to do?
And is there any truth to the rumors that the govt. wants the people off the land so the govt. can make good on selling mineral rights to the Russians (esp. Uranium) pursuant to an agreement made by Hillary? (I've seen rumors of such elsewhere on FR.)
And the govt. ending up shooting people over occupying what appeared to be a "closed for the season" ranger station, looked like "the usual bureaucratic overreach" seen from MOVE getting burned down in Philadelphia, to Waco and the Branch Davidians, to the motorcycle gangs in Texas where a bunch of people got shot and those who didn't get shot, got indicted.
Trump might not cavil over ownership of the land...and I agree his broad brush big mouth simplistic take on it doesn't look encouraging: but what I've seen of him is that he often walks back his initial remarks, after he's taken the time to read up on the issues. As a New York City Developer, I bet he hasn't thought about rural land issues much. But I bet he'd side with citizens over the bureaucracy, when it is clear the bureaucracy is just yanking people around for the fun of it.
Libs won’t be put in camps but we know who will.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.