Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Teacherís First Encounter with Gay Activism
Crisis Magazine ^ | March 30, 2016 | TOM MCLAUGHLIN

Posted on 03/30/2016 3:56:08 PM PDT by NYer

Homosexuality became an issue early in my teaching career with the beginning of the AIDS epidemic, which coincided with my return to the classroom from an administrative position in 1979. The outbreak was a major news story and I covered it in the current events portion of my classes. We had only one nurse for six schools in our Fryeburg, Maine district and she asked if she could come into my social studies classes so we could teach sex education together. She believed my presence would make it easier on the boys. She was a conservative, Catholic woman and a widow. I was still quite liberal at the time and my own faith had grown lukewarm, but we worked well together for about three years, emphasizing abstinence and monogamy within marriage.

Prior to these developments I didn’t have occasion to deal with homosexuality, but four things happened in the early 1980s to bring it roaring into my world:

First: The “Gay Liberation” movement, which began with the Stonewall riots in 1969, had gained political power in Maine and elsewhere. Many states were repealing anti-sodomy laws and “gay pride” marches were commonplace in several major cities, including nearby Portland, Maine in the 1980s.

Second: AIDS. At first the disease was labeled GRID, for gay-related immunodeficiency. Shortly afterward homosexual activists lobbied hard to change it to AIDS, or “Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.” The push was on to de-emphasize the disease’s strong connection to homosexual males in the United States.

Third: Homosexual activists had become powerful enough to turn the AIDS epidemic, which could easily have reversed the progress of their movement, into a vehicle to further it. Enormous outlays of government money went into both finding both a cure and a strategy to prevent the virus from spreading. Groups like Gay Men’s Health Crisis and ACT-UP (AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power) were steering that spending in directions that furthered the homosexual agenda—which activists insisted did not exist.

Fourth: Their propaganda campaign pushed slogans like: “AIDS Does Not Discriminate!” and “AIDS Is An Equal Opportunity Disease!”—designed to scare heterosexuals into believing AIDS would soon become widespread among them as well. This would further separate AIDS and homosexuality in the public mind, and it caused public schools to consider outrageous sex education strategies they would never have considered otherwise. That brought homosexuality into my everyday world as a teacher.

I tried my best to oppose the politically correct strictures that accompanied any discussion of AIDS. Ultimately though, there was little I could do but watch with dismay as the gay juggernaut rolled over public schools—and me—for almost three decades.

One of my sisters worked as a public health nurse in Massachusetts early in that period. She was bewildered when discovering that contact tracing, which was mandatory to prevent the spread of other sexually transmitted diseases, was not used to prevent the spread of AIDS. When someone got syphilis or gonorrhea, it was reported to state authorities. The infected patient was mandated to report his or her sexual partners who could then be contacted by public health nurses like her to inform them they’d been exposed to the disease and should get tested. These were common-sense, effective measures to contain STDs historically, but for AIDS—an incurable, fatal disease—they were abandoned.

When my sister told me about exceptions for people with AIDS—nearly all of them homosexual men—I was flabbergasted. Then I learned it was because of pressure from activists who put furtherance of their political/sexual agenda ahead of protecting public health—and those exceptions continue at this writing. Learning that the Democratic Party had been complicit throughout the process further accelerated my political evolution from left to right. It also motivated me to write about the subject as a columnist.

The Intolerance of Gay Activists
LGBT activists were among the first on the left to target me. Their campaign of opposition began innocently enough when strident letters to the editor appeared in newspapers publishing my columns. Later, I came to know most of the letter writers as activists pushing their agenda in Maine and New Hampshire. When letters didn’t silence me, they escalated.

Strident letters were fair enough in the marketplace of ideas. A few dealt with issues I’d written about—public health efforts to prevent the spread of AIDS—but most were ad hominem attacks generously sprinkled with the usual charges of “homophobia”; “hatred”; and “bigotry.” At first, they disturbed me, but such accusations became so numerous and frequent they lost their bite. I made it a policy not to respond in my column, trusting in the intelligence of my readers to see them for what they were.

My first column on homosexuality ran under the headline: “I’m Not Homophobic; I’m Homoexasperated” and outlined what I’d learned about AIDS and the homosexual agenda. America and the public schools were bombarded with propaganda about how AIDS would soon spread to heterosexuals and devastate them as much as it had homosexuals. In Maine, as in other areas, activists took control of government funding to combat AIDS. They targeted Maine schools with proposals to teach children about the specific sexual practices with the greatest danger of transmitting HIV, like anal sex.

Some of these activists proposed teaching students about things they could do sexually that would be less likely to spread AIDS, such as mutual masturbation. That kind of thing is commonplace in public schools now but it was brand new then. Some of the literature surrounding their proposals—and given to teachers—made mention of sex acts I’d never heard of: things called “fisting” and “rimming.” I had to do research to find out what those were. When I learned, I was appalled, and I wondered how any professional educator could possibly propose that schoolchildren be taught about them. As far as I know, they were not put into any specific curriculum in Maine at the time and now I realize they were mentioned as a way of de-sensitizing us to the bizarre nature of what some people did sexually. They wanted us to become jaded by their efforts toward “defining deviancy down,” as the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan put it decades before.

Though I never heard of these gay sexual acts being taught in Maine, they were in Massachusetts. “Fisting” was not only described, it was actually recommended to ninth graders at a special conference workshop paid for, in part, with state funds and delivered by three Massachusetts state employees. It was, of course, ignored or played down by the mainstream media. The keynote speaker at the conference, Kevin Jennings, later became President Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar,” to deal with bullying.

Deviancy had indeed been defined down—way down. The most troubling thing to me, however, was that it hadn’t yet bottomed out.

The Contagion Spreads
As I write this, I’m seeing news stories in conservative media about similar Planned Parenthood curricula for schools all over the country. Although these curricula are used with our children in public schools, they’re kept from parents. In Hawaii, they’re even kept from state legislators. Why? Because mainstream media outlets typically ignore the stories—like they did in Massachusetts, and, unfortunately, too many parents won’t believe something is really happening unless they see it on television.

Nonetheless, parents sometimes discovered things at the family dinner table after asking little Johnny what he learned in school that day—and were appalled when he told them. If they complained to administrators or school boards, they would be depicted as right-wing, Christian lunatics. Frustrated, they lost faith in public schools and either put their children into private schools or homeschooled them. Left-wing, homosexual activists like Kevin Jennings were then free to continue pushing the limits of what was considered appropriate or inappropriate in our public schools—all at taxpayer expense.

In the early 1990s when I started publishing regular weekly columns, I figured things couldn’t get much worse than what I was seeing and hearing. I believed that if I just informed people about what was going on, they’d rise up and put a stop to it. Now I see how naive I was. I didn’t comprehend the power of the leftist forces I was up against. A few years later, however, I learned that the left preached tolerance of alternative ideas and lifestyles only until they got firm control of the culture. After that, they became rigidly intolerant of opposing views.

Homosexual activists were my earliest and most vociferous adversaries. While I wrote about issues such as suspending the use of contact-tracing in AIDS cases and others, they relied on ad hominem attacks such as: “McLaughlin is poisoning young minds with homophobia. He’s unfit to be a teacher.” First they used letters to the editor, then they applied pressure on administrators and school boards, then used the courts. They and other leftists put me through the ringer for years. I endured it all until my retirement in 2011.

Editor’s note: The column above is an excerpt from the author’s forthcoming memoir of his life as a New England school teacher.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: aids; gay; hivaids; homosexual; homosexualagenda; schools; sex; sexed; sexualeducation; teacher

1 posted on 03/30/2016 3:56:08 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; Salvation; ...

Catholic ping!


2 posted on 03/30/2016 3:56:37 PM PDT by NYer (Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy them. Mt 6:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Already posted here.
3 posted on 03/30/2016 4:10:30 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Tax money was actually used to help spread AIDS. And then, the more AIDS cases there were, the more tax money they got. And the money was used to help further the gay pride movement.

Kids were taught to use condoms in school, although the authorities knew perfectly well that if you have sex with a gay person, there’s a fifteen or twenty percent chance you’ll get it through the condom.

Money was also used to spread it through Africa, by distributing condoms and encouraging limitless sex. The countries with the smallest numbers of AIDS cases were Catholic countries that encouraged sex only between married partners and fought the condom distributors.

The whole thing was a horrible business. Gays killing each other, in effect, so they could come out of the closet and have a good time.


4 posted on 03/30/2016 4:11:59 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The pendulum will swing back, when is the question.


5 posted on 03/30/2016 4:14:04 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Back in the 80s David Horowitz and a friend discovered that AIDs could be halted in its tracks or substantially reduced by some common sense health measures which involved the male homosexual community in SF. He and his friend gave a talk to a number of city residents and expected to be applauded when done with their talk.

Instead, there was no applause and some angry questions from some audience members. Horowitz and his friend had said that closing down homo bath centers and using condoms would greatly cut down on transmission of the disease. The mostly homosexual audience members didn't want to hear that. They wanted to continue doing what they were doing and demanded a cure.

Horowitz was flabbergasted. He thought for sure his speech would be greeted warmly. Instead the angry response from the homos showed him they were an intransigent and radical group that not only refused to follow common sense health practices but endangered the population at large with their dangerous activities.

Which is one huge reason I feel little sympathy for many homos who came down with the disease. The disease could have been stopped in its tracks before it killed many thousands of people including many non-homosexuals. I wish all the homosexual advocacy groups could be launched into outer space never to be heard from again.

6 posted on 03/30/2016 4:22:59 PM PDT by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I ran up against this in the 80’s as the parent of a 6th grade public school student in GA. I asked to see the curriculum and was appalled by the subjects covered. These were things that I only knew about because I had taken an abnormal psych class in college during the 70s. When I asked if the teacher would be teaching that these acts were deviant, she told me no, she could not place a moral context on the material.
We requested our daughter be excused from the classes and so began a period of attempted intimidation for us and embarrassment for our child. The teacher would ignore the written request and keep her in the class. When we would complain we were told we were the only ones who objected and that we were the ones harming our child by attracting attention to her leaving the classroom making her different. When research established we were legally able to require our daughter be excused, we asked an attorney friend to write a letter threatening a lawsuit if she was not excused from the class. We also learned we were not the only parents who objected and asked for the exemption, as we had been told, there were 3 others. After the threat of a lawsuit the nonsense stopped and the 4 who were not supposed to be in the class were sent to the library for that period. There were 22 children in that class whose parents either did not know or care. I would be surprised if they had not known I was pretty vocal about it.


7 posted on 03/30/2016 4:37:07 PM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Anyone remember the big San Francisco fire back around 1979-80? Extra police were called and extra firetrucks along with rescue units. It was all over the news, then the story suddenly died. Not a word about it.

According to the rumor mills, the firemen fighting the fire came upon several dungeons with young men chained to the walls, so they had to call extra backup for rescue.


8 posted on 03/30/2016 4:38:02 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

A very wise man, my late father, told me many yeas ago that the pendulum does swing, but never as far to the right as it had been before. He was right.


9 posted on 03/30/2016 4:40:05 PM PDT by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

When the pendulum swings back it won’t be a pendulum but a sword.


10 posted on 03/30/2016 4:43:31 PM PDT by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: suthener

True that, unless it gets a push on the swing back. 8>)


11 posted on 03/30/2016 4:44:11 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

It was called “spreading the gift”. Sick.


12 posted on 03/30/2016 4:44:34 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Especially if the Muslims take over. Gays would be the first to feel the steel.


13 posted on 03/30/2016 4:46:00 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


14 posted on 03/30/2016 5:11:51 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Everyone has the opportunity to express their opinion, believe their God and work for their economic benefit.

However, we seem to lose the sense of right and wrong. Good and evil.

An aggressive group is allowed by political correctness to step on the rights of others for their evil ways.

Are we losing the ability to stop evil?

God’s way is prayer and to love one another. Are we doing enough?


15 posted on 03/30/2016 5:16:53 PM PDT by ADSUM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM

Maybe people were pretending it was about “just the gays.”

That kind of went out of the plausible zone with the government redefinition of marriage.


16 posted on 03/30/2016 5:57:14 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

I don’t believe I have ever heard that before.


17 posted on 03/30/2016 7:13:19 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Does anyone else remember seeing an interview on TV with a homosexual activist who declared that the only way AIDS research would be sufficiently funded would be if straights got it, and urged homosexuals to donate blood regularly? Early/mid 70s I think.


18 posted on 03/30/2016 7:20:20 PM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Governor BILL CLINTON did his share by selling AIDS infected blood from Arkansas convicts.


19 posted on 03/30/2016 7:45:17 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: suthener
Our society was compromised from the start by a fundamental dedication to subjectivist self-assertion in a Protestant-turned-secularist way, so your swinging-pendulum analogy holds true for our society. Our predicament is that no matter how far out the pendulum swings, people are inoculated against a full swing back to the right because they stop short of staring down questions of truth square in the eye. They are deeply allergic to questions of truth, smelling in them some kind of conspiracy to take away their personal sovereignty. Hence no equilibrium is possible.
20 posted on 04/03/2016 5:52:27 PM PDT by Mmmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson