Trump on climate: He's even worse than we thought

Mashable ^ | May 27, 2016 | Andrew Freedman

[jimfree]

Warming alarmism is not environmentalism. It is hard-left fascism.

[LambSlave]

“We’re going to cancel the Paris Climate Agreement and stop all payment of U.S. tax dollars to U.N. global warming programs," Trump said.

Woo Hoo! Liberal heads exploding everywhere == best election ever!

[E. Pluribus Unum]

He’s even better than I thought!

[kiryandil]

The speech amounted to a broadside against the Obama administration's climate and energy policies,...

[ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton]

ALIENS CONTACT OBAMA: STOP TRUMP!!!

[Ancesthntr]

"Trump on climate: He's even worse than we thought."

Trump on climate: He's even worse better than we thought.

There, fixed it.

Anyone who can call the climate lobby for the anti-American, lying, thieving SOBs that they are, has my vote. The only thing that he could do that is better is to cover the border wall with seal pelts, polar bear skins and alligator hide. :>)

[Ancesthntr]

Great pic, thanks.

Note that the guns have so much recoil that they push a 45,000 ton ship about 10-20 yards back. Just awesome!

[Georgia Girl 2]

By “worse” they mean somebody with a brain.

[Buckeye McFrog]

And the endorsements for Trump keep flooding in.

[Qiviut]

Trump is worse only if you’re a Lefty/Lib/Prog & are using “climate change” as a means to further strip money from the taxpayers & transfer it to corruptocrats & their cronies, foreign & domestic.

[exDemMom]

As someone who does quite a bit of research myself I know how easily “findings”can be skewed if the person conducting the investigations makes up their mind on what the solution or causation of a particular problem is and then begins assimilating evidence UNobjectively to “prove” their “theory”.

That might be a problem for criminal investigations, but it is not scientific method. Attempts to conduct research in order to "prove" a desired result cannot go very far. That's because science progresses by building on past work. If that past work is not accurate, then the hypotheses that drive current work are incorrect, and results of experiments based on those hypotheses will be unusable. There simply won't be a basis on which to base future research.

Much of the process of getting an MS or PhD in science is to learn how to minimize bias.

[jsanders2001]

> Attempts to conduct research in order to "prove" a desired result cannot go very far.

Can you explain this to the Obama Inquistion then?

[FourtySeven]

Thank you! You’ve made my Friday.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

He could send the left into an absolute froth by calling for the restoration of the coal industry. Expedited, long term mining leases, expedited construction of a whole bunch of modern coal fired energy plants. And even undermine their squeals about CO2, by redirecting the energy plants CO2 into tandem algae biodiesel plants.

This would mean that more of these plants would be built in the South, to take advantage of their sunshine and heat.

Personally, I think his best bet would be to encourage industrial production of aerogel insulation. Just by making it cheap enough to insulate buildings and heating or cooling appliances, would save an incredible amount of energy.

[exDemMom]

Can you explain this to the Obama Inquistion then?

No. They are politicians trying to corrupt science to advance their socialist totalitarian agenda.

[cornelis]

We never get news nowadays.

[US_MilitaryRules]

That means to me, that he is better than I thought! lol

[US_MilitaryRules]

AWESOME!!!!! One of my favorite pictures.

[poconopundit]

And one of the worse fake science texts was Al Gore's book, An Inconvenient Truth...

[JimRed]

By “worse” they mean “infinitely better than anything we’ve heard in years, if not decades.” Right? (That’s how I took it, anyway.)

Yep. He's gonna derail their gravy train, and they don't like it one bit!