Posted on 06/29/2016 9:12:51 AM PDT by mbarker12474
Go to the website to read the cherry picked, slanted, and deliberately falsified New York Times / David Herszenhor article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?ref=politics&_r=0
Headline: House Benghazi Report Finds No New Evidence of Wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton
By DAVID M. HERSZENHORNJUNE 28, 2016
some pulled quotes:
... the House Select Committee on Benghazi issued its final report on Tuesday, finding no new evidence of culpability or wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton in the 2012 attacks...
... In addition, it included some new details and context about the night of the attacks on the American diplomatic compound and reiterated Republicans’ complaints that the Obama administration had sought to thwart the investigation by withholding witnesses and evidence.
... did not dispute that United States military forces stationed in Europe could not have reached Benghazi in time to rescue the personnel who died ....
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
This article was front page, top of the fold in the print edition delivered here in Virginia.
Like it will make any difference.
How about the old evidence of wrongdoing? Including that stuff about a certain video and the lies related to it? Those don’t count unless they are “new”? LOL!
Regardless of politics, everyone knows that Benghazi was a fustercluck that was managed by Hillary Clinton.
Without correction, Hillary will give us more of the same.
More Americans dead and more American property destroyed.
Who wants that?
The NYT - all the propaganda that’s fit to print.
Ah, the 99% Leftist-leaning NY Slimes, and their Doublespeak version of the truth to protect their precious Hitlary
It was obvious that the media would use their full forces to protect the Queen of America on her quest for full power.
It will be that way till the election: whitewash anything Her Royal Hipness does and trash Republicans.
“How about the old evidence of wrongdoing? Including that stuff about a certain video and the lies related to it? Those don’t count unless they are “new”? LOL!”
___________________________________________________
You didn’t know? Inside the Beltway, if news is more than 24 hours old it is deemed irrelevant.
Unless it’s about Richard Nixon. Then going back 40 or so years is okay.
The media is in full Hillary 2016 support mode. Expect it to remain that way.
No “NEW” Evidence but all the “OLD” evidence showed she lied.
There it is.
The biggest, nastiest, most killing, criminal politician gets the pass by the federal government.
The American People know she is guilty, and has been charged, and knows of the charges.
I got a funny feeling that since the bloviated uniparty of bacon wrapped shrimp will not do anything to this female, that somebody named John Q. or even Jane Q. Public, just might, in their own way, by their own means, and won’t be a soul that would know that, till the deed is done.
All I can say is, “Beware the Praetorian Guard, Hillary!”
Gowdy’s fault. Republicans don’t know how to use it.
“This article was front page, top of the fold”
Same thing ran in today’s Tampa Bay Times; front page...top of the fold. There are another 100 or more newspapers around the country that did the same thing with the story. These newspapers are colluding to effect a Presidential election for the DNC and Clinton.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.