Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat AGs Targeting Climate ‘Dissenters’ Face Legal Demand
Daily Signal ^

Posted on 07/15/2016 5:31:08 PM PDT by ameribbean expat

State government figures spearheading an effort to obtain documents from scientists and researchers who dissent from the Obama administration’s position on climate change are being asked, once again, to come clean about their relationships with environmental organizations.

But this time around, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey have only two weeks to comply with a demand for information from a House committee that the two Democrats have resisted previously.

That’s because the demand comes in the form of subpoenas issued Wednesday to Schneiderman, Healey, and eight environmental advocacy groups. The House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology took the action after being rebuffed in previous efforts.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: brexit; climate; climatecontrol; fraud; tyranny; uk

1 posted on 07/15/2016 5:31:08 PM PDT by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

How does Congress get oversight of state attorneys-general? This seems like a Constitutional misstep.


2 posted on 07/15/2016 5:33:28 PM PDT by NelsonEddyFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NelsonEddyFan

The Commerce clause!


3 posted on 07/15/2016 5:34:59 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NelsonEddyFan

Do the Feds have no say if a state goes banana-republican?


4 posted on 07/15/2016 5:38:20 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

Fighting big gov with big gov.


5 posted on 07/15/2016 5:46:20 PM PDT by JPJones ( You can't help the working class by paying the non-working class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

Britain’s New Prime Minister Drives A Stake Through The Heart Of The Green Vampire

7/14/2016, 4:11:34 PM · by 867V309 · 24 replies

breitbart.com/london ^ | 14 Jul 2016 | James Delingpole
Incoming Prime Minister Theresa May has driven a stake through the heart of her predecessor David Cameron’s fluffy, faux-Conservative project by scrapping the Department of Energy And Climate Change (DECC).

Established in 2008, DECC was a hangover from the Gordon Brown era of woeful misgovernance. Its first Secretary of State was future failed Labour leader candidate Ed Miliband whose only significant political achievement also happened to be one of the most expensive and pointless in British parliamentary history: the drafting of the truly disastrous Climate Change Act.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3449469/posts


6 posted on 07/15/2016 5:52:53 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Obama Immigration Policy-Bring Terrorists to Our Neighborhoods-Take our guns away-Make us feed them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

FTA: “This isn’t a fight about the First Amendment because the First Amendment doesn’t protect false and misleading speech.....”

The ‘H’ it doesn’t. Find a politician anywhere that doesn’t use false and misleading speech.

FTA: “.....Congress does not have the authority to interfere with a state inquiry into whether a private company violated state laws, and we will continue to fight any and all efforts to stop our investigation.”

When several of the states Attorneys General came together as opposed to a single Attorney General from a single state I do believe they opened themselves up for such inquiry.

“FTA” “From The Article”


7 posted on 07/15/2016 5:58:05 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

Global warming agenda is pure Marxism, through and through.

In some ways it is as evil as Islamism. Both are Weapons of Mass Destruction in the ever-duplicitous arsenal of the Fabian socialists . . . along with political correctness dogma, feigned cries of racism, control of media and control of higher education.


8 posted on 07/15/2016 6:06:04 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

Someone is standing up to Lysenkoism. Will wonders never cease?


9 posted on 07/15/2016 6:24:31 PM PDT by sima_yi ( Reporting live from the far North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
The First Amendment does protect false and misleading speech. However the courts have held it does not protect false and misleading commercial speech. An interesting question whether politicking is a commercial enterprise. It most definitely is these days, but in the truest sense of the First Amendment, politicking must be protected speech. But if you can sue a food company for selling you pumice oil labeled as extra-virgin olive oil, why can't you sue a politician to return a donation made under false promises?
10 posted on 07/15/2016 6:34:07 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

The Commerce Clause would be a disastrous intrusion on the ability of states to enforce their laws if it were allowed to preempt attorneys-general. If the states overreach that would then be the job of the courts to check them


11 posted on 07/15/2016 7:02:11 PM PDT by NelsonEddyFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

Above all, Schneiderman is looking for a big, public case to build his credentials - that’s how AG’s in NY did it - Spitzer, Cuomo, etc...

Of course, a nice big shake-down “settlement” from the targets is another goal, which will be used to fund plenty of campaigns and foot-soldiers for future elections for Schneiderman

The guy is corrupt as can be.


12 posted on 07/15/2016 8:50:15 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Oil companies have lots of good lawyers. It is not the job of Congress to run interference for them.


13 posted on 07/16/2016 1:52:01 PM PDT by NelsonEddyFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NelsonEddyFan
The Democrat Executive Branch characteristically blocks pro-life, pro-business, and anti-pervert legislation and administrative actions by the conservative states. If the enemy overrides states' rights in these cases, why shouldn't a GOP Congress do the same against the liberal states? The Left doesn't play by Marquis of Queensbury rules. Why should Republicans tie their hands? It's Grant vs. McClellan, Churchill vs. Chamberlain.
14 posted on 07/16/2016 2:04:39 PM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.

No Republicans should violate Constitutional constraints because the other side does? It sounds like you are promoting anarchy.


15 posted on 07/18/2016 3:30:50 PM PDT by NelsonEddyFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson