Posted on 09/03/2016 11:12:16 AM PDT by Kaslin
Any criminal defense lawyer worth their salt will offer their clients a list of options when it comes to interviews with federal investigators. They normally will tell their clients to avoid testifying, but if they do testify then to tell the truth. They can also plead the fifth and assert their right of protection against self-incrimination. Or in the case of Hillary Clinton they can simply claim I cant recall. A person cant be proven later on by investigators to have lied if they insert a convenient lapse of memory at the appropriate time during an interview. A tactic that the trained lawyer Hillary has used repeatedly throughout her career.
During her husbands administration when she served as First Lady, Hillary Clinton was questioned under oath during the investigation into the Whitewater scandal. According to reports about her testimony, the then First Lady had a great deal of difficulty remembering anything at all, using the I dont recall or I dont remember defense a number of times. For Clinton having a photographic memory and testifying truthfully would not be a good thing at all. Indictments almost certainly would follow !
The strategy for Clinton has always been to lie about any potentially embarrassing issues that may come to light, and then when the initial lie starts to fall apart just compound it with another lie. And to keep doing so until people eventually become so confused that they cant keep track of how many lies were told, and what the original lie was about in the first place.
As part of her tactics to cover up her dishonesty she will often make subtle changes to her original lies. Change a word here, change a word there. We all remember how her unequivocal statement I never sent any classified information morphed into I never sent anything marked classified, and other variations.
Always phrasing her statements just enough to provide herself a little wiggle room so that she can create a question for investigators about her original intent. This she apparently did remarkably well during the recent FBI investigation into her use of a private e-mail server, since the FBI recommended no prosecution. Even though intent should have played no part in the Bureaus decision.
And she has shown herself to definitely be a practitioner of the old adage if you tell a lie often enough people will begin to believe its the truth. She has done so with all of the questionable activities she has been involved with throughout her career, from Whitewater, cattle futures, covering up bimbo eruptions involving her husband, the Benghazi attacks, and many, many others. Of course most Democrats use this tactic often. Barack Obama told us repeatedly that we could keep our doctor, we could keep our health insurance plan didnt he ?
Lying repeatedly over the many years of her long public life has become such a part of Clintons persona that it sometimes seems to have become difficult for her to recognize what is the truth, even when testifying under oath and facing the threat of perjury charges. But Hillarys no dummy, shes a trained lawyer so she simply resorts to strategically invoked lapses of memory when confronted with particularly troublesome facts.
In Hillarys case shes found it necessary to lie about practically everything shes ever been involved with, since practically everything shes ever been involved with has crossed the line into unethical at the least, and criminal at the worst. Including her most recent pay for play scandal via the Clinton Foundation.
The calls for an independent special prosecutor continue to grow from Republicans in Congress and many others outside of government, since it appears the Obama Justice Department under Attorney General Loretta Lynch is not willing to represent the American people and hold Hillary Clinton accountable.
Curiously silent about the depth and breadth of evidence that is mounting against Clinton has been the so-called mainstream media. One can make the case that much of the news media is guilty of aiding and abetting a criminal enterprise by helping to cover up for the Clintons. Would they be as gracious towards a Republican candidate with the same record ?
While theres been a lot of recent discussion about whether or not Clinton is experiencing some health issues that shes been trying to cover up, the real problem with Clinton is that she continues to try to cover up her many character flaws. Clearly its intended to keep from voters the fact that shes the most dishonest and corrupt politician in American history to ever run for President of the United States.
In one regard the election of Hillary Clinton would indeed truly be an historic event. If the campaign lasted just a little longer, Hillary could be the first candidate ever to run for president while wearing a criminal ankle bracelet.
Lapses in memory can be proven false. It might be difficult, but sometimes it can be shown a person remenets exactly that which they once claimed to forget.
FROM THE WASHINGTON TIMES: In the portions of President Clinton’s Jan. 17 deposition that have been made public in the Paula Jones case, his memory failed him 267 times. This is a list of his answers and how many times he gave each one.
I don’t remember - 71
I don’t know - 62
I’m not sure - 17
I have no idea - 10
I don’t believe so - 9
I don’t recall - 8
I don’t think so - 8
I don’t have any specific recollection - 6
I have no recollection - 4
Not to my knowledge - 4
I just don’t remember - 4
I don’t believe - 4
I have no specific recollection - 3
I might have - 3
I don’t have any recollection of that - 2 I don’t have a specific memory - 2
I don’t have any memory of that - 2
I just can’t say - 2
I have no direct knowledge of that - 2
I don’t have any idea - 2
Not that I recall - 2
I don’t believe I did - 2
I can’t remember - 2
I can’t say - 2
I do not remember doing so - 2
Not that I remember - 2
I’m not aware - 1
I honestly don’t know - 1
I don’t believe that I did - 1
I’m fairly sure - 1
I have no other recollection - 1
I’m not positive - 1
I certainly don’t think so - 1
I don’t really remember - 1
I would have no way of remembering that - 1
That’s what I believe happened - 1
To my knowledge, no - 1
To the best of my knowledge - 1
To the best of my memory - 1
I honestly don’t recall - 1
I honestly don’t remember - 1
That’s all I know - 1
I don’t have an independent recollection of that - 1
I don’t actually have an independent memory of that - 1
As far as I know - 1
I don’t believe I ever did that - 1
That’s all I know about that - 1
I’m just not sure - 1
Nothing that I remember - 1
I simply don’t know - 1
I would have no idea - 1
I don’t know anything about that - 1
I don’t have any direct knowledge of that - 1
I just don’t know - 1
I really don’t know - 1
I can’t deny that, I just — I have no memory of that at all - 1
Number of times that Clinton figures who testified in court or before Congress said that they didn’t remember, didn’t know, or something similar.
Bill Kennedy 116
Harold Ickes 148
Ricki Seidman 160
Bruce Lindsey 161
Bill Burton 191
Mark Gearan 221
Mack McLarty 233
Neil Egglseston 250
Hillary Clinton 250
John Podesta 264
Jennifer O’Connor 343
Dwight Holton 348
Patsy Thomasson 420
Jeff Eller 697
Why is grandma pickles looking at porn anyways?! Any decent person would never open a porn site! What was she looking for boobs or willies? The pickle witch is probably a dyke as speculated in the past!!
Perhaps they should compare the failure to recollect against any emails that that she received or sent that bear upon the question, especially if those emails were after her conk on the head.
Well, that pretty much rules out anybody named Clinton.
Her answer of “I don’t remember” thirty-nine times could come back to haunt her (yeah, right).
People are voting for a person of sound mind. If Hillary is admitting she couldn’t remember...especially because of the concussion...she’s admitting her mind is damaged.
Taking that route hopefully shows that she’s not for for the job.
It’s beginning to sound like Watergate 2.0.
Hillary “John Dean” Clinton.
Not only is she a perv like her husband but she’s also brain damaged!
Trying to catch these two is like trying to catch two pigs wallowing in their own pig poop.
Ain’t irony wonderful!
Where IS Hillary today? I hear there’s an election in about 60 days. She ought to be campaigning somewhere, no?
“President Clintons Jan. 17 deposition - his memory failed him 267 times”
I thought the guy was known for being able to recognize and call thousands of people by their names.
Do I recall right?
The entire Clinton era from 1992 to today has seen an amazing change in the way politics are viewed in this country.
We went from a President being run from his office in 74, to be treated to the extreme parsing words that we started to learn in ‘91 when Bill “caused pain in his marriage.”
Now we hear “I don’t recall” and “there is no evidence of...”
Trumps every utterance is held like gospel when it is clear he is exaggerating or being sarcastic.
The second amendment folks would do humanity a favor by “voting” out all of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.