Skip to comments.
Trump Win Threatens Climate Funds for Poor, a key to Paris Accord
Marine Link ^
| November 13, 2016
| Joseph R Fonseca
Posted on 11/13/2016 7:11:46 AM PST by artichokegrower
President-elect Donald Trump's policies are likely to make it harder for developing nations to obtain the growing finance they need to combat climate change, threatening one pillar of a 2015 international agreement to slow global warming.
(Excerpt) Read more at marinelink.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: followthemoney; globalwarmingscare; marxism; redistribution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Among the first casualties could be the Green Climate Fund (GCF), meant to help developing countries act. Rich nations promised the GCF $10 billion in a first round of funding in 2014, including $3.0 billion from the United States.
Sorry but we need the $3 billion here. Typical world wide fund United States kicks in largest share of money.
To: artichokegrower
Maybe they can get it from the Clinton Foundation. Whatever that noble cause did not already spend on Haiti,.....
2
posted on
11/13/2016 7:13:21 AM PST
by
Bernard
(The Road To Hell Is Not Paved With Good Results)
To: artichokegrower
Nothing more than welfare for foreign governments
3
posted on
11/13/2016 7:13:34 AM PST
by
stocksthatgoup
(these protestors are not anarchists. They are Hillary Supporting Demoncraps.)
To: artichokegrower
Trump to stop socialist redistribution of wealth.
4
posted on
11/13/2016 7:14:19 AM PST
by
stockpirate
(OBAMA MUST BE ON THE PAYROLL OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.)
To: artichokegrower
Add a line to the tax form for people to voluntarily increase their taxes to fund it.
5
posted on
11/13/2016 7:15:01 AM PST
by
BRL
To: artichokegrower
See, so called climate change, it’s all about money, about redistribution of wealth.
6
posted on
11/13/2016 7:15:33 AM PST
by
Rebel2016
To: artichokegrower
President-elect Donald Trump's policies are likely to make it harder for developing nations to obtain the growing finance they need to combat climate changeDo these people write this stuff with a straight face or do they spew their coffee through their nostrils all over their 'puters as they write this stuff?
7
posted on
11/13/2016 7:18:28 AM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Texas Eagle
A lot of them don’t write with computers.
8
posted on
11/13/2016 7:19:49 AM PST
by
Lisbon1940
(No full-term Governors!)
To: artichokegrower
That money is needed here; poor nations should adopt freedom/capitalistic governments so then they could become rich and fight climate change on their own.
9
posted on
11/13/2016 7:20:34 AM PST
by
JPJones
(George Washington's Tariffs were Patriotic. Build a Wall and Build a Wall of tariffs.)
To: Lisbon1940
What do they write with? Chisel and stone?
10
posted on
11/13/2016 7:20:39 AM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: artichokegrower
I studied history like everyone else in school. I don’t remember reading about any countries giving us money so we could grow with it. We did it ourselves, the old fashioned way, by acting like a growing nation by trading and supporting ourselves first. Want to be a growing nation, great. But you’re not our growing nation. And maybe you shouldn’t be a growing nation if you are so reliant on help in today’s world and aren’t prepared to be a nation. We’ve got our own problems that foreign welfare adds to.
red
To: Texas Eagle
Please note that China will look at this global climate change hoax in 2050. Think America should follow their lead.
12
posted on
11/13/2016 7:23:00 AM PST
by
Kozy
(new age haruspex)
To: artichokegrower
...make it harder for developing nations to obtain the growing finance they need to combat climate change...
What climate change? Be specific. And how are those dollars going to be used to combat this mythical dragon? And how will the taxpayers that supplied those dollars be benefited?
This is the second most important reason I did not want a hillary win. The Donald will, hopefully, end all this AGW nonsense, once and for all.
13
posted on
11/13/2016 7:25:08 AM PST
by
Mr. Douglas
(Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
To: artichokegrower
The 3 billion would mostly stay ‘here’- in the hands of donor/cronies paid to make or provide the “green” assistance.
That’s how ‘foreign aid’ works.
Maybe some money can instead be spent for things/help that would actually do the poor some good.
14
posted on
11/13/2016 7:25:30 AM PST
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: stocksthatgoup; All
Exactly. As long as we have poverty in America (I'm talking true poverty, not welfare cheats) I would not allow a dime to go overseas to anyone.
For 60 years, I have been hearing the expression, "developing counties." If they aren't developed by now, they never will be, regardless of how many trillions we send overseas.
15
posted on
11/13/2016 7:25:40 AM PST
by
Cobra64
(Common sense isn't common any more.)
To: artichokegrower
I use this word when talking to Global Warmers, it drives them crazy: ECO-PROFITEERING prof·it·eer /ˌpräfəˈtir/ noun 1. a person who profiteers: "a war profiteer" synonyms: racketeer, exploiter, black marketeer, bloodsucker, vampire verb 1. make or seek to make an excessive or unfair profit, especially illegally or in a black market: "the profiteering of tabloid journalists" synonyms: overcharge, racketeer, cheat someone, fleece someone, rip someone off, rob someone Please make it part of your vocabulary... :)
16
posted on
11/13/2016 7:27:37 AM PST
by
Trteamer
( (Eat Meat, Wear Fur, Own Guns, FReep Leftists, Drive an SUV, Drill A.N.W.R., Drill the Gulf, Vote)
To: artichokegrower
Nothing more than an Obama slush fund to redistribute American tax dollars to the Third World.
Terminate it.
17
posted on
11/13/2016 7:27:51 AM PST
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: Kozy
Sheeeeyit. China funds most American politicians who push the Climate Change Hoax.
They use our system to hamstring us.
I don't remember who it was but some Commie Pinko Dictator said decades ago that The United States will sell us the rope with which we will hang it.
Obviously China has figured out how to do that; through the DemocRAT Party and the Climate Change Hoax.
18
posted on
11/13/2016 7:28:10 AM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: artichokegrower
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
19
posted on
11/13/2016 7:32:27 AM PST
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: artichokegrower
You mean we the People won't have to keep all them third world countries on our Welfare rolls? Maybe they'll learn to fend for themselves once they can't bask in their poverty and not have to worry about making a living.
Just as Johnson and the ensuing liberal agenda created a huge welfare State by disincentivizing so many, we have done the same to a number of other Nations...
20
posted on
11/13/2016 7:34:12 AM PST
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson