Posted on 11/29/2016 7:41:00 AM PST by LS
This whole thing is a fraud. While it may never be prosecuted anywhere as such, it doesn't stand a hope in hell. I think Team Trump has taken it seriously, but I think they know it has no legs, ANYWHERE.
Please ping any of your lists that are discussing this.
Team Trump has its lawyers poised but they can’t do much unless a decision to perpetrate the scam is actually made. Since they missed the filing date of 21 Nov and couldn’t get enough PA residents to aid and abet, they claim the election was “illegal” and that won’t carry a drop of water.
This is about the fifth time this article has been posted.
The author obviously has far more faith in the Pennsylvania judiciary than I do.
Bump
To Read Later
Jill Stein is a communist. Therefore, she seeks as much personal gain as possible for herself and as much chaos as possible for everyone else. This is the game of communism
Well, that's cool. January 20th still can't get here soon enough.
After the recent death of Fidel Castro, a Cuban-born trumpet playin' dude named Arturo Sandoval said words to the effect that he was happy Castro was cremated so his bones couldn't defile Cuban soil.
Yo Laz, how many days?
A long shot in your analysis, but draw dropping nonetheless, is the remote possibility of a Trump/Cankles administration. What a thought!
Thanks, very worth the time. And on a similar note:
Given your knowledge of these issues, let me take this opportunity to re-post a link to the thread I put up last night regarding the Wisconsin recount. In a 30 minute interview with Vicki McKenna, retired judge and constitutional lawyer Jim Troupis explains in detail how the WI recount process works, and why it is impossible for WI elections to be “hacked”. He also explains why the request for hand counting cannot possibly succeed because Stein cannot possibly argue that it will change the outcome of the election as the law requires.
Given the number ov vanity posts on the Recount topic, there must be immense interest amongst FReepers, and since this was posted late at night I thought it would be good to mention it again in broad daylight. If you want to know the FACTS of the WI Recount, take the time to listen to the man who wrote the recount procedures several years ago when the first statewide recount in over 100 years took place (Prosser election).
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3499341/posts
Time for some good lawyers to start law suits against Stein, Clintoon and their evil financier, George $oreA$$. For acting in a conspiracy to take away the votes of Americans in the states Stein has approached.
ping
Someone that donated money to her for the recount should sue her for fraud and racketeering.
that would stop all this crap.
Great. Thank you. And anyone who has MI info can add in here too.
Adams/Jefferson. Except Cankles ain’t no Jefferson.
I suspect the vote analysis done by Stein (really the DNC behind the scenes) was performed not on the basis of where there might be fraud but rather on where stood the best chance to reverse the election results.
It certainly flies in the face of Bush v Gore and, should the pathetic attempt to hijack the election proceed, I’d expect Trump’s team to demand a statewide process. Let’s look deeply into the Philadelphia count, for example.
Stein doesn’t post any money to Penn, and the odds that no money will be posted to Mich or Wis...then all that money that came to Stein will just end up in her pocket? What’s it amount to? Five or six million? Was that the whole gimmick in the end?
Thanx for the retirement fund, American bozos
Well, excuse me. I’ve had 20 requests to post my own thoughts and this was a convenient way to include all his information with mine.
I agree and for the life of me I can’t figure out why no one is suing her on Bush v. Gore, or even citing it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.