Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Manchin: Unwise to block Trump's Supreme Court pick
Washington Examiner ^ | 12/5/16 | Susan Crabtree

Posted on 12/06/2016 7:44:36 AM PST by GonzoII

West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin on Monday warned the Democratic Party not to engage in payback when it comes to President-elect Trump's nomination to the Supreme Court or they will continue to lose a significant portion of the electorate in rural states like his who helped hand Trump the presidency.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 114th; manchin; scotus; trump; trumpscotus; trumptransition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2016 7:44:36 AM PST by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Sounds like a man who is getting ready to JUMP


2 posted on 12/06/2016 7:45:47 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

So many Republicans voted for Kagan and Sotomayer, and they turned out to be as bad as can be.


3 posted on 12/06/2016 7:46:52 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Looks like he’s up for reelection in 2018.


4 posted on 12/06/2016 7:47:55 AM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Sounds like a guy who has to run in a state where Trump won in 2018.


5 posted on 12/06/2016 7:50:29 AM PST by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

What’s wrong with payback?


6 posted on 12/06/2016 7:51:16 AM PST by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lisbon1940

It cuts both ways.


7 posted on 12/06/2016 7:51:41 AM PST by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

To a party that just re-elected Pelosi to leadership, this will fall on deaf ears.


8 posted on 12/06/2016 7:54:49 AM PST by Don Corleone (Oil the gun, eat the cannolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

I am thinking since he is seeing Mr. Trump at Trump Tower, that he might be thinking of changing to Repub...

I kind of like him, from what I have vetted so far...


9 posted on 12/06/2016 7:58:04 AM PST by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

He should address that to Maine’s two, collins and king.


10 posted on 12/06/2016 8:06:10 AM PST by The_Republic_Of_Maine (politicians beware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Change parties or take the Sec of Energy job. You would be a valuable team member.


11 posted on 12/06/2016 8:07:22 AM PST by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Absolutely terrible jurists. Unqualified affirmative action appointments, to go along with Clinton’s idiotic choices........one can tell in advance what their votes will be, no matter the isse


12 posted on 12/06/2016 8:08:37 AM PST by A_Former_Democrat ("Liberalism is a mental disorder" On FULL Display NOW BOYCOTT PepsiCO Kellogg's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

I don’t see how 60 votes will be found to have the vote on confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee. The court may stay at 8 members until 2019 or 2021, depending on later elections.


13 posted on 12/06/2016 8:11:03 AM PST by Theodore R. (Let's not squander the golden opportunity of 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I don’t see how 60 votes will be found to have the vote on confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee. The court may stay at 8 members until 2019 or 2021, depending on later elections.

Leverage. Negotiation. The Art of the Deal. :)

14 posted on 12/06/2016 8:24:55 AM PST by BAW (It is Yuge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat
.one can tell in advance what their votes will be, no matter the issue

That would be fine if you could tell because they were trying to follow the U.S. Constitution, but they follow their own appetites.
15 posted on 12/06/2016 8:26:18 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Well, considering the nominee will most likely be Senator Mike Lee of Utah and thus one of their colleagues, it will make it harder to dismiss him as an ‘extremist’. They’ll try, of course, but he’s generally well liked. R’s may have to go nuclear, but I’m fine with that since Republicans never mount opposition to Dem appointments anyway, so losing the filibuster for the supreme court is meaningless to us.


16 posted on 12/06/2016 8:33:12 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

I don’t see how 60 votes will be found to have the vote on confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee. The court may stay at 8 members until 2019 or 2021, depending on later elections.


The GOP will have 52 votes. 53 if Heitcamp takes a cabinet position. 54 if Manchin votes mostly GOP. We only need to flip a few Dems at this point to break Dem solidarity and get to 60. Assuming no GOP traitors of course. There are a few Dem Senators up for election in states Trump won handily. MT, MO, etc. Chuckie boy is going to have his work cut out for him keeping the Dems together, IMO. The party is massively split.


17 posted on 12/06/2016 8:33:49 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I don’t see how 60 votes will be found to have the vote on confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee.

Current Senate rules are for 51 votes. Thank you, Democrats and Gang of 14 RINOs.

18 posted on 12/06/2016 8:37:04 AM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lisbon1940
Payback for what?

As far back as I can remember, the GOP has been a rubber stamp for the Dems agenda.

19 posted on 12/06/2016 8:38:35 AM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

So many Republicans voted for Kagan and Sotomayer, and they turned out to be as bad as can be.

888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

Honestly, were you surprised that they “turned out to be...bad”?? They were known bad batches well prior to nomination.


20 posted on 12/06/2016 8:39:51 AM PST by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson