They can't accept that they lost. Remember when they were worried we wouldn't accept the election results? These people have protested a fair election in the streets, tried recounts, and now are trying to invalidate the election results by blaming the Russians. Trump was right on Twitter today. If we blamed the Russians, they'd call it #FakeNews and a conspiracy theory.
Funny there were no such agonies about whether Barack Obama was “fit.”
This is the lone a-hole elector. More obfuscation.
I assume little Miss Pelosi is a democrat elector. What’s she thinking of doing, changing her vote to Trump? None of this makes sense at any level.
One Republican, eh? The NYTimes’ favorite Republican elector, perhaps?
OH GIVE ME A BREAK, THIS SHIT NEEDS TO STOP RIGHT NOW !!
A coup d’etat will not be tolerated.
Bull crap. We are not going to allow them to steal the election.
And the 09-11-2012 attack in Benghazi was caused by an anti Muslim video.
Just another deflect and distract lie the DNC directed Fake Media is pimping to justify not looking at the facts in the emails.
So IF the Russians did interfere in the election what then? Do they think anyone can predict who would have won without said alleged interference?
Such a joke - these people couldn’t predict Trump was even close rather than going to win in such a huge way - and now they are going to want us to believe he would have lost if not for alleged interference.
10 members of the Electoral College are asking U.S. intelligence officials for more information on ongoing investigations surrounding President-elect Donald Trump’s relationship with Russia.
We know of no such relationship, but we do know that Hillary and her Campaign Manager John Podesta has EXTENSIVE FINANCIAL dealings with Putin, and they regularly communicated. We also know that Hillary had numerous Financial ties to the Saudi’s and that the Saudi’s contributed 20% of her campaign funds($300 Million)in an effort to BUY INFLUENCE.
anything else?
Is it time for President Trump in 2017 to end the CIA?
President Truman did not trust the OSS and its increasing power.
At the end of WWII, he signed an ExO ending the OSS.
September 20, 1945, President Truman signed Executive Order 9621, terminating the OSS. His Order became effective October 1, 1945. In the days following, the functions of the OSS were split between the Department of State and the Department of War.
The State Department received the Research and Analysis Branch of OSS (originally created by Edward Mead Earle[28]) which was renamed the Interim Research and Intelligence Service or IRIS,[29] headed by U.S. Army Colonel Alfred McCormack. Later it was renamed the Bureau of Intelligence and Research by the State Department.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Strategic_Services
They should cast their votes for Bernie to protest the incompetence of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in their dealings with Putin (remember the “reset” and Obama’s “flexibility”?) and for being so careless with email security. If they were hacked by Russia it was low-hanging fruit.
And the “republican” is Chris Suprun, the guy who back when he RAN for elector said he’d support the republican nominee, who was known to be Trump, but then even before the convention came out and said he couldn’t vote for Trump. Before saying he would, and then again saying he wouldn’t because of his “transition”, which was a crock because he had already said he wouldn’t back in August.
Anyway, Texas needs to do a better job of screening their electors probably.
I’d love to see a pledge from these electors that, if the briefing showed no collusion, they’d all switch their vote to Trump. Barring that, there’s no reason to brief them, as the information provided would be of no use.
And the “republican” is Chris Suprun, the guy who back when he RAN for elector said he’d support the republican nominee, who was known to be Trump, but then even before the convention came out and said he couldn’t vote for Trump. Before saying he would, and then again saying he wouldn’t because of his “transition”, which was a crock because he had already said he wouldn’t back in August.
Anyway, Texas needs to do a better job of screening their electors probably.
I’d love to see a pledge from these electors that, if the briefing showed no collusion, they’d all switch their vote to Trump. Barring that, there’s no reason to brief them, as the information provided would be of no use.
Even if Russia did hack the DNC, what does that have to do with Trump's fitness to serve?
Why are there no demands for an investigation into illegal immigrant voter fraud?
That’s a bad idea. We know the CIA is well versed in creating dog and pony shows. Remember Colin Powell at the UN doing his powerpoint describing Iraqi chemical facilities and wmd programs?
Do the electors even know what a VPN is, or any of the other ways that make it impossible to tell where the attacker originates?
And the “republican” is Chris Suprun, the guy who back when he RAN for elector said he’d support the republican nominee, who was known to be Trump, but then even before the convention came out and said he couldn’t vote for Trump. Before saying he would, and then again saying he wouldn’t because of his “transition”, which was a crock because he had already said he wouldn’t back in August.
Anyway, Texas needs to do a better job of screening their electors probably.
I’d love to see a pledge from these electors that, if the briefing showed no collusion, they’d all switch their vote to Trump. Barring that, there’s no reason to brief them, as the information provided would be of no use.
Headline of the Day Poll
Should the Electoral College be abolished?
Yes, direct democracy is the only fair way to hold elections
No, it preserves the vital concept of Federalism
Read more: http://www.headlineoftheday.com/2016/12/11/should-the-electoral-college-be-abolished/#ixzz4SaMENQuN