When the judge is overturned, we can all make fun of him.
Trump should remove him immediately. Elections have consequences!!! 8>)
Typically Trump!
Or is this Fake Law?
DantheMan123 has the plan —
temporarily stop immigration from ALL countries until a vetting process is worked out.
I hope someone gets that to the Trump people ASAP
“When a country is no longer able to say who can, and who cannot , come in & out, especially for reasons of safety &.security - big trouble!”
Unfortunately, in this case, the federal judge does speak for the country.
And while President Trump cannot remove the federal judge, Trump can grant Pardons to all Homeland Security Agents that refuse to follow the federal judge’s order.
President Trump could also fire or suspend all Homeland Security Agents and replace them with Military Police who would be completely under President’s Trump’s control.
The judge should be impeached.
Once ignorance of the law on their part is demonstrated, judges should be removed from the bench and incarcerated.
Drain the judicial swamp.
Don’t know if he can though with the RINO Congress in the way.
Would love to see him campaign against them in 2018 and sweep in a new conservative Congress.
Trump was far too kind in his words to this hack unelected tyrant.
I dont have a problem with the point of the tweet. But calling the judge “so-called” was a boneheaded move that is completely counfer-productive and distracting from the point. After all, the judge IS a legally appointed judge. Point Democrats.
40% of the federal bench are Obama stooges thanks to Reids packing of the courts. We should create a lower level of Federal court which would be stripped of it’s power to set precedent and whose outcome would be limited only to the defendants and that in turn limit to groups of 100 or less. Then move the stooges to those lower courts.
This judge should be in page for interfering with the National Defense of the United States which is under the authority of the president of the United States and not the judicial branch
This is not the system our Founders designed. The Congress granted the president these powers nearly 70 years ago. It is an obscenity that a single low-level judge can stand in the way of that massive precedent.
Over the last decade, the will of the people has manifested itself in winning statehouses, state legislatures, both houses of congress, and now the presidency.
And one judge thinks he can go against that?
Where in the constitution does it say that people who are not citizens and not physically in this country get some sort of right of entry?!!! He’s essentially legalized illegal immigration...dissolving the notion of a national boundary.
I think this judge said that application of the law is one thing, but a judge must take into consideration the effect a law has on society, and rule accordingly. In other words, this judge is fully on board with legislating from the bench if such actions advance social goals.
GET HIM, President Trump. The decent, hard-working, law-abiding citizens of America are standing with you.
As far as I can tell, if some judge can get away with acting unilaterally with no basis in law WHAT SO EVER then what exactly was the point of bothering to vote for Trump in the first place?
I don’t know how appellate judges’ minds work, but if pissing them off hurts your case, cracks about a “so-called judge” will probably do the job.