Posted on 02/06/2017 6:53:09 PM PST by markomalley
“After the hearing, Thornton described his client as ‘a young kid who was tweeting from his bedroom. He’s very sorry that he ever got himself involved in something like this.'”
His targets would have been even sorrier if this poor “young kid” had carried out his plans.
Meanwhile, is anyone investigating where he learned his understanding of Islam, or is that question being waved away yet again with the claim that he was “radicalized on the Internet”?
“Pennsylvania man, 20, pleads guilty to charges he conspired to aid the Islamic State,” Associated Press, January 30, 2017 (thanks to Creeping Sharia):
A 20-year-old Pennsylvania man pleaded guilty Monday to trying to help the Islamic State group and to tweeting out a list that identified and targeted people serving in the U.S. military.
(Excerpt) Read more at jihadwatch.org ...
Islam is a war plan.
Hey, let’s import more! /sarc
He is a 20 yr old native-born American. Why did we let his family in here?
He was arrested in 2015... Guess Imam in Chief Obama was in no hurry: http://www.pennlive.com/news/2015/12/fbi_raid_nabs_harrisburg_man_a.html
Hang him in the public square.
L
He wasn’t “radicalized” - he was educated into the death cult known as islam.
Stupid guy who tried to burn a mosque got 30 years.
This guy’ll get a professorship at Cornell.
Which is why the rules need to change to allow military to carry on base.
What the hell is the point of having a sheepdog only to get it declawed, defanged, and throwing it to the wolves?
Someone needs to take this "young kid" and feed him to wood chipper with the rest of his family.
GITMO
...This guy’ll get a professorship at Cornell...
He’ll get busy converting inmates to radical jihadi Islam while in prison. And be allowed to do it.
Wouldn’t it be funny if Lt. Col. Joseph Mouer and his wife, Rosa Brooks, were on his list?
The rules about military personnel carrying on base have changed. http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/11/21/dod-releases-plan-allow-personnel-carry-firearms-base.html
This happened as of Nov 2016. The sheepdogs have been re-fanged.
With bacon up his ass.
20 ‘Vetted’ Muslim Refugees Who Turned to Terrorism After Being Allowed Into America
https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2017/02/01/20-vetted-muslim-refugees-who-turned-to-terrorism-after-being-allowed-into-america/
3 ‘triggers’ for Islamic uprising under Trump presidency
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/3-triggers-for-islamic-uprising-under-trump-presidency/#mWP7xumb3xWjVw3s.99
http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/3-triggers-for-islamic-uprising-under-trump-presidency/
Not the way that I read the article.
Commanders, O-5 and above, "may grant permission to DoD personnel requesting to carry a privately owned firearm (concealed or open carry) on DoD property for a personal protection purpose not related to performance of an official duty or status," the document states.
Applicants must be 21 years of age or older, the age many states require an individual to be to own a firearm, according to the document. Proof of compliance may include a concealed handgun license that is valid under federal, state, local or host-nation law where the DoD property is located.
"Written permission will be valid for 90 days or as long as the DoD Component deems appropriate and will include information necessary to facilitate the carrying of the firearm on DoD property consistent with safety and security, such as the individual's name, duration of the permission to carry, type of firearm, etc.," according to the document.
The directive states that personnel authorized to carry privately owned firearms must "acknowledge they may be personally liable for the injuries, death, and property damage proximately caused by negligence in connection with the possession or use of privately owned firearms that are not within the scope of their federal employment."
The eligibility requirements also state that applicants should not be subject to past or pending disciplinary action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice or in any civilian criminal cases.
There are an awful lot of caveats listed there, starting with finding an O-5 or above (Lieutenant Colonel (Army/Air Force) or Commander (Navy)) to give "permission" in the first place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.