Great Post!
Ok so.. they apply for a warrant with FISA in june and were turned down. Then in October they appealed (diffrent then FISA court) an got a warrant ... the appeals court was three Clinton appointed judges...
Now if during that gap beween june and oct they were taping.
And there is suggestion from Hillary tweets that she had some information concerning it even before Oct
Because I guess evidence that was collected pending the appeal could not be used in Court. But its does not stop illegal use of the information for political reasons
Really this let someone start a tap with no warrant.
And even if you never get a warrant approved that just means what you collect can’t be used in court ...
But it does not stop them illegally using it for political purposes. Just like they did with flynn
So that means under this law, Obama started surveillance of Trump in June, sent the order to the FISA court, was denied, then kept up the surveillance throughout the "appeal process" until October, when a FISA approved a re-written surveillance request that supposedly did not have the name "Trump" in it.
No "Trump" name in the October order, except for the location in "Trump Tower."
Flashback: | 12/31/2012 | Meghan Kelly
President Barack Obama signed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act bill into law yesterday after the U.S. Senate voted for an extension of the President George W. Bush-era spy bill 73-23.
The FISA bill gives the government clearance to tap into American citizens communications with people outside of the U.S. without a warrant, so long as it is done in the name of collecting foreign intelligence. Obama has previously stated his approval of the bill, saying that the U.S. needs such measures when dealing with national security.
More specifically, it means that government entities such as the National Security Agency are able to watch Americans without probable cause. They need only an order from the secret FISA court, and they dont have to alert the targeted citizen prior to the wiretapping.
Perhaps more concerning is the fact that the surveillance can begin before an order is received and can continue through an appeals process should the court decide not to issue the order, as Wired notes.
Hmmmm.
Return to lawful, USConstitution, USA, or perish. Either we are a nation of law or we are a democracy, where a mere 51% can vote for _anything_ they want. Enemies of USA, do not care about limited government.
Unparented, undocumented, unaccountable, unacceptable false narrative Frankensteins - FISA & Obama.