True, so don’t WARN them.
A few DUmmies are known to lurk these hallowed halls.
That fact alone is grounds for prosecution and underscores the legal quicksand the Obama team is in is evidenced by the paper trail left by Obama and his minions, aside from the electronic trail.
Two FISA oks were requested to tap Trump....and apparently, one, perhaps two were granted. There is no doubt that Trump was tapped by Obama (that is to say, his minions).
FISA TIMELINE
June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request, uncharacteristically, is denied.
October 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons.
===========================================
The Obama wire-tapping gang WILL have to face the music.
(JIM0216 hat tip)......the issue isn't whether Trump was wiretapped (Obama admitted such and there's a FISA paper trail...... warrants issued for the wiretapping). The issue is whether there was probable cause to issue a warrant. Probable cause is defined as the reasonable likelihood that a crime is or has been committed by the person or at the place designated........
===============================================
(REAGANGENERATION2 HAT TIP)---Trump should be able to review all 2 or 3 FISA requests (if he hasn’t already), and then let Congress determine if the requesters lied about the probable cause justifying them......then (1) you’d prove perjury, and, even worse, (2) the intent was to abuse executive power.
===========================================
A good beginning....and then it gets downright lethal for the Obama gang:
Via Breitbart, JOHN HAYWARD observed that the FISA court may have approved a warrant submitted without Trump’s name but “which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump.”
Ergo the most serious legal jeopardy that might be faced would be (a) perjury for lying to the FISA court, and, (b) the dissemination of collected intelligence that should have been kept tightly classified.
===========================================
It is also entirely possible that Obama and his legal team may have perjured themselves before the FISA court by willfully withholding material information in order to manipulate the FISA court’s willingness to permit the government surveillance.
FALSIFYING GOVT DOCUMENTS would fall under the Crimes Act of 1958. Moreover, falsifying official documents is the criminal MO to hide larger crimes.
EXCERPT A person falsifying documents can be held criminally liable if they are deliberately acting with the intention of deceiving or defrauding another party.
Falsifying documents is a very serious offense and is generally classified as a felony. This means that a person charged with falsifying documents may be subject to the following legal penalties:
◾Having to pay a monetary fine
◾Incarceration in a prison facility
Depending on the gravity of the offense, as well as individual state laws, falsifying documents can result in a prison sentence of 5-10 years.
And if official government documents or govt authorities were involved, the legal penalties may be more severe. Legal penalties may increase with repeat offenses.
Many different types of acts can be considered as falsifying a document, including:
◾Altering or misrepresenting fact-based information
◾Stating false information when requested to provide truthful statements
◾Forging a signature
◾Using official letterheads without authorization
◾Knowingly using or distributing a fake document
The penalty for falsifying government documents is outlined in the Crimes Act of 1958. (excerpt)
“...confirmed on Monday in testimony before the U.S. House Intelligence Committee that President Barack Obama did not wiretap Trump Tower. But that was already known.”
Not clear. Is he saying that the intelligence agencies confirmed, or that Obama did not wiretap Trump Tower. Two different concepts.
This idiocy about wiretapping has got to stop; Trump obviously meant surveillance when he put quotes around “wiretap”.
Every politician I have heard speak on the subject is careful to avoid the term “surveillance”. Always issue denial using the term “wiretap”. Why?
Has the Speaker been held to account for allowing a full blown espionage ring to operate in the House. He needs to resign immediately and a proper investigation of the Pakistani infiltration of the Intelligence and Foreign Affairs Committees needs to commence. Was that operation responsible for the death of the Seal in Yemen?
Difficult to do, since Comey is nothing but an asswipe for Clinton and the Globalists.
Monday’s testimony didn’t “debunk” anything. What Comey and Rogers should have been asked is, “If there weren’t any surveillance, electronic or otherwise, where did the transcript of Mike Flynn’s conversation with Ambassador Kislyak come from?”
Follow up to Rogers: “Admiral, if neither the NSA nor the FBI engaged in surveillance of now-President Trump, where else could that transcript have originated?” (He would not answer, but it would bring considerable doubt into the “There was no surveillance” narrative.)
Follow up to Comey: “Director, do you acknowledge the fact that the transcript of the conversation between General Flynn and Ambassador Kislyak could only have been obtained through physical (very unlikely) or electronic surveillance? Furthermore, would you agree that the transcript, however obtained, would be classified and, if so, what agency would be responsible for investigation of the leaking of that transcript to the media or anyone else without a clearance and a need to know?” Answer: the FBI. “So what are you doing about it?”
And yet the ever-disappointing Gowdy failed to ask the two men before him, under oath, if they were the one who disclosed Flynn’s identity or the information from the surveillance he was caught on.
Why?
Thanks for posting!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3536671/posts?page=1#1
Ping to dems uncovering embarrassing info about surveillance of Pres. Trump.
Connecting the dots, the only question is whether Obama ordered it or didn't stop it. I hope those 'pubs who are on are side start getting answers to that.
It is the hubris of those that believe they are above the law that will be their own destruction.
Trump’s wiretapping tweets were NOT debunked. Comey said he had seen no evidence of that wiretapping and neither had the Justice Department. That is not equivalent to debunking Trump’s claims.
They certainly did. What was confirmed was that an FBI investigation of the candidate Trump was ordered most likely by Loretta Lynch. So what we have is a sitting President ordering an investigation into a candidate of the opposing party during an election. WOW!
This parsing of words is so Clintonesk (which is synonymous with disgusting). “Surveillance” is synonymous with “wire tapping.”
It took the (FBI) 15 years to find a navy officer who sold secrets to Russia guess how long it’s going to take to tag anything on Obama and Val’s off shore accounts that are in her kids name as they say in valley talk like never.
Democrats Hoped to Hurt Trump, but Raised Suspicions of Obama >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Warranted suspicion. Obama is away on a private island, highly secure, called Bounty Island. Restricted entry. Its near Bora Bora ion Fren ch Polynesia.Obama is there for a month WITHOUT the wookie.
WHY?
Simple.
So the House Committee on Intelligence cannot subpoena him.
Trump was wiretapped.And Obama had it dome just as he arranged for the leaks and dissemination of transcripts.
Full steam ahead find the culprits and lock them up, time to put reporters in jail until they reveal their source as in what happened to Judith Miller during the Plame deal.