I wonder how the first person was birthed, or for that matter, the first animal or organism. Two males mating??
Sex is for procreation. Two people of the same sex cannot procreate. Story over.
Interesting how liberals are all about things scientific except when it goes against their dogma.
Liberals hate biology, so they try to redefine words or invent new ones.
I actually don’t believe in “heterosexuality,” as a counterpart to homosexuality. Acknowledging it’s existence at least opens the door to homosexuality as being an “alternative.”
There is simply sexuality according to design, and sexuality against design.
I’m guessing the author is a faggot trying to justify his perversion and feel good about sodomizing other men.
Me thinks they think too much.
If only for the tiny, mere fact of their EXISTENCE, every homosexual should “Thank a Heterosexual Today!”®
Here is all I need to know from the Center of Disease Control — If it was SO natural then why does this occur:
HIV and AIDS Diagnosed:
•Gay and bisexual men accounted for 83% (29,418) of the estimated new HIV diagnoses among all males aged 13 and older and 67% of the total estimated new diagnoses in the United States.
•Gay and bisexual men aged 13 to 24 accounted for an estimated 92% of new HIV diagnoses among all men in their age group and 27% of new diagnoses among all gay and bisexual men.
•Gay and bisexual men accounted for an estimated 54% (11,277) of people diagnosed with AIDS. Of those men, 39% were African American, 32% were white, and 24% were Hispanic/Latino.
Is this or this not nature’s way of applying “natural law” to restore order?
Seriously, mother nature has a way of restoring order when nature itself is out of balance — When man’s instincts run amok.
I’m not even talking about the law of man...This is all natural law.
Prior to 1868, there were no heterosexuals,” writes Blank. Neither were there homosexuals. It hadn’t yet occurred to humans that they might be “differentiated from one another by the kinds of love or sexual desire they experienced.” Sexual behaviours, of course, were identified and catalogued, and often times, forbidden. But the emphasis was always on the act, not the agent.
Thats simply revisionist bullsh-t.
In fact most of the article is rife with such garbage.
thanks for posting it!
Nature does NOT ‘invent.’ Nature is part of a grand plan, and that plan really doesn’t include a prevalence of deviancy becoming the norm under any circumstances. If anything this dilemma is a test of convictions for the faithful.
Have you ever heard of a Dumb-F**K, well this is it. Without medicine for AIDs and HIV these people would die off. Lead poison is credited with brining down the Greeks and maybe too the Romans, but their “self indulgences” and perversions “lead” to their demise. Pleasure replaced hard work.
“But this rebuttal assumes that heterosexuality is the same thing as reproductive intercourse. It isn’t.”
The principles of natural selection, stable societies and long established religions all strongly favor same-sex attraction, and disfavor any other kind. Apparently the author puts his biases above science, tradition and faith.
I need to share this in the FR community...a living story if you will...one passed down through oral history in my family. My great ancestors admitted that “they settled on heterosexuality,” in order to one day in the future, “oppress those who might be against heterosexuals.” They claimed a natural attraction to members of the opposite sex—at first it was for convenience, but then they discovered that they could produce offspring who would one day produce future generations. It’s silly and antiquated reasoning to be sure, but that’s the truth.
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. The accompanying diagrams are NSFW.
Things have really gone downhill since it was somehow decided to give equal time and credibility to the blatantly ignorant, insane, and stupid among us. They're like movie zombies, except they're alive and instead of eating brains they just work to infect the world's cortex. Problem is, lots of them have been elected into office and hired into teaching positions. Those need to die off, with a shove if necessary.
These people are freaking nuts.
Most homosexuals were sexually molested as children.
They seek to normalize their behavior to attain easier access to sexually molest YOUR children.
>https://www.ewtn.co.uk/news/latest/yes-childhood-sexual-abuse-often-does-contribute-to-homosexuality<
Cave Man 1 to Cave man 2: You want to put your what up my what?
The author, and the authors he quotes are horribly intellectually dishonest.
Something does not just come into existence ONLY because some academic, intellectual, writer or even the law gives it a name - like “heterosexual”. Being “heterosexual” with or without it being named, as such, was “the norm” without question, as far back as humans have been around, and the fact that there were always exceptions misses that they were exceptions, exceptions to what, to what was “the norm” - the majority case, the most frequent case, the case most people expressed. Merely naming it had nothing to do with it.
To the contrary, sex (penetration/internal fertilization as a component of reproduction) has 250 million years of history.
In a nutshell, the first animals to walk (crawl, slither, etc) on land were egg-laying amphibians, the eggs of which had to be laid in the sea. Reproduction would have been impossible if they roamed more than walking distance from the sea.
The development of internal fertilization was necessary to support their migrating inland to populate the heart of the continents.
Looking at the ducks in my pool... heterosexuality seems pretty instinctual.
It’s one thing to accept other sexuality. It’s another thing to pretend hetero is not the planetary norm for higher order animals.