Posted on 07/30/2017 9:34:07 PM PDT by Beave Meister
Someone put this reminder up on reddit and it’s one we should keep in mind as the right-wing is silenced. Google changed the definition of Fascism from “centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition” to “right wing system of government and social organization” this year.
It was another smear and more fake news. Democrats have shown once again that they are willing to rewrite the dictionary and history to not only camouflage what they are doing, but to shut down the right.
Redefining “fascism” is a way of protecting their henchmen in Antifa and other Soros-funded groups for one thing. They disguise who they are. Antifa or anti-Fascist groups pretend they are fighting fascism, all the while they are the fascists. They call Trump Hitler and say only the right can be fascist.
As Daily Caller reports, Merriam-Webster defines the word “fascism” as “a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.” The secondary definition is “a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control.”
(Excerpt) Read more at independentsentinel.com ...
Libholes are always redefining things to suit their objectives, but such maneuvers will never change the fact that they are and will always be unhealthy and unsustainable.
Hitler hated what he regarded as the right wing bougeois democracies of the UK and US, whom he denounced as dominated by “plutocrats,” rich capitalists (and, naturally, Jews). National SOCIALISM which had done away with silly right wing tradtions like elections was so much better, doncha know. Until they began losing the war, most Germans agreed with him.
Here’s an interesting very short video: “Yes, They Changed the Definition Of Fascism”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0CHWNIoJJU
Hitler was a leftist.
National Socialism was discredited in WWII, leaving international socialism the Socialist leader world wide.
But they are both socialist. The leftist attempts to win without an arguement by saying you only have two choices: national socialism, which they define as being on the right, and international socialism, defined as being on the left.
Both are leftist and opposite of the right, which is concerned with limited governments.
Google is fascist.
Beat me to it.
I don’t use google for definitions. I use a dictionary
I googled fascism and didn’t get ‘right wing’ in the top result listed, which linked to Wikipedia. Come to think of it, how would Google have its own definition of any word? Google searches the web and returns links. Any wacky definition they come up with is from the linked source, not Google. Am I missing something?
Fascists and socialists always rewrite history to flatter themselves and demonize everyone else. This is exactly what liberals are doing now.
Google lies.
Although our modern socialists’ promise of greater freedom is genuine and sincere, in recent years observer after observer has been impressed by the unforeseen consequences of socialism, the extraordinary similarity in many respects of the conditions under “communism” and “fascism.” As the writer Peter Drucker expressed it in 1939, “the complete collapse of the belief in the attainability of freedom and equality through Marxism has forced Russia to travel the same road toward a totalitarian society of un-freedom and inequality which Germany has been following. Not that communism and fascism are essentially the same. Fascism is the stage reached after communism has proved an illusion, and it has proved as much an illusion in Russia as in pre-Hitler Germany.”
No less significant is the intellectual outlook of the rank and file in the communist and fascist movements in Germany before 1933. The relative ease with which a young communist could be converted into a Nazi or vice versa was well known, best of all to the propagandists of the two parties. The communists and Nazis clashed more frequently with each other than with other parties simply because they competed for the same type of mind and reserved for each other the hatred of the heretic. Their practice showed how closely they are related. To both, the real enemy, the man with whom they had nothing in common, was the liberal of the old type. While to the Nazi the communist and to the communist the Nazi, and to both the socialist, are potential recruits made of the right timber, they both know that there can be no compromise between them and those who really believe in individual freedom.
— F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom
Today we call a liberal of the old type a conservative. Today’s Liberals are just socialists or worse.
Ha! Liberals have to revise the proper definition of Fasicsm... because ‘Progressivism’ is TOOOOO much LIKE Fascism…
I don't know about other "right-wingers" but I believe in individual freedom. Fascism is the opposite.
ML/NJ
btt
The Ministry of Truth, to be exact.
Fascism: Socialists that use force to get ensure everyone conforms to their program.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.