Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mattis allows transgender troops to continue serving pending review
WPIX ^ | August 29, 2017

Posted on 08/29/2017 5:12:07 PM PDT by SMGFan

— Transgender troops will be allowed to continue serving in the military pending a review, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis announced Tuesday. His announcement comes just days after President Donald Trump directed the military not to recruit transgender troops. Trump initially tweeted that transgender individuals could no longer serve in the military

(Excerpt) Read more at pix11.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; maddogmattis; mattis; secdefmattis; trannylover; transgender; trumpdod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141 next last
To: central_va
"You’ve never been in the military have you?"

I'll send you my DD214...does the asylum have a fax#?

I actually participated in several 'surprise inspections'...in the form of the whiz quiz...can Gibbs or McGee explain to you how that is different than "As a military officer you can search anywhere, anything, anytime on a military facility".

But just to make sure I'm piecing this together correctly - you are walking back from 'no 4th amendment rights' and creeping towards 'work arounds', which is an acknowledgement that soldiers and sailors do indeed have 4th amendment rights, and you were wrong all along...and apparently you acted with malice and deliberately attempted to 'work around' sailors' constitutional rights.

Yes, I was in the military. And other than routine 'spit shine' inspections and the occasional whiz quiz, I can count 1 instance in 9 years of any type of inspection looking for contraband. It sounds like you were in a terrible unit, run by morons, who treated sailors like inmates.

121 posted on 08/30/2017 8:25:16 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
Members of the military give up the USC rights. The UCMJ may have the concept of probable cause in it but that is a joke and easily worked around. As it should be.

We had a drug problem on the ship I was on. The CO and XO were tyrants in that regard. Probable cause, yeah right. LOL.

122 posted on 08/30/2017 8:34:15 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: central_va

It can go pretty fast, but these days 2 weeks would be considered lightning speed. The time frame also depends on whether the person is willing to leave or wants to fight part of the process which can add time. Usually more like 4 months for the process to play out now for an average. Remember this is not one individual they are dealing with- it is a group that has to be dealt with. The review is to determine exactly what the process will be to deal with processing out the group, then it will begin.


123 posted on 08/30/2017 8:34:28 AM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: central_va

It will be more complicated than that. What about a person that says they are transgender, does not act out on it- no surgery plan, no cross dressing. No other legitimate reason to discharge them. Then what? This will all have to be determined by the review process.


124 posted on 08/30/2017 8:37:05 AM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Ok...just keeping things straight now...you now acknowledge that everything you have been saying is bullshi'ite and 100% wrong, but dismiss sailors' constitutional rights as a 'joke', and relish your commander's being a 'tyrant'.

And just to get back to the original topic...your experience in the military of ignoring UCMJ, dismissing it as a 'joke', and acting like a 'dictatorship' would be an effective way to rid the military of trannies, as opposed to doing it in a methodical manner, which would (hopefully) withstand the ultimate court challenge - a court challenge you were initially in denial about ever happening, but will surely happen and be highly publicized and politicized.

IOW, the poisonous command climate in your piece of crap drug infested unit is just what the doctor ordered for a bulletproof repeal of Barry's tranny policy. How about we try it another way first.

125 posted on 08/30/2017 8:49:24 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

The only “rights” you have in the military is the right to follow lawful orders. JAGS can kiss my ass if you think that I recognized an enlisted men’s Constitutional rights. They had rights under the UCMJ and they were treated like men. If they had a problem with me they could take it up the chain. I had no problem with them doing that and I encouraged them to do so.


126 posted on 08/30/2017 8:50:48 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
This may come as a shock to the JAG corp but I did not/do not recognize the constitutional rights of the enlisted men that were assigned to me when on duty or on a military installation. Nor did any of the other officer that I knew or served with. That concept is a joke.

Once you walk down the brow or drive off the base you are on your own. You have whatever rights the foreign country we are visiting gives you or if in the USA the rights of any other civilian.

At sea you are 7/24 on a military installation and have zero constitutional rights.

The military is not for everybody.

127 posted on 08/30/2017 9:01:02 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
dismissing it as a 'joke', and acting like a 'dictatorship' would be an effective way to rid the military of trannies,

The war business is a cruel business. We need to re learn that.

128 posted on 08/30/2017 9:04:11 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Not sure why you think I'm JAG...far from it...just born with an ounce or two of common sense. It sounds like your entire time in service was a freaking nightmare....and you have learned the exactly wrong lessons from it.

You obviously won't admit you were 100% wrong on at least 4 declarative statements you have made on this thread - and have now regressed into the 'we did what we wanted no matter what the rules' mode. OK that was your experience...but I am BEGGING YOU: Quit making FAKE statements about military in general, based on your screwed up experience in it. central_va = FakeNavy

129 posted on 08/30/2017 9:22:49 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: central_va
The simple solution is for the CIC(i.e. the President) to make faggotry a UCMJ violation then the legislative actions taken buy congress are rendered moot. It's all political not legal.

Pre-Clinton it already was. I enlisted in 1977 and right there in the contract was "are you now or have you ever been a homosexual?" (I'm paraphrasing) and you had better have initialed/checked "no" or you weren't getting in. After Clintonian "don't ask don't tell" was signed into law, that little clause was actually redacted on the contract. It was still there, just blacked out.

Now that the wolf is in the chicken coop, I don't think it will be easy to get rid of them again.

130 posted on 08/30/2017 9:31:54 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

You can face reality or deny reality, you have choosen the latter.


131 posted on 08/30/2017 10:09:29 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

Gee, my experience in the navy seemed real to me at the time. maybe I was dreaming.


132 posted on 08/30/2017 10:11:22 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

For those staying, its called a Bar to Reenlistment, keeping them from signing up for another enlistment period. The reason is simple, a mental disorder that points to an unreliability in stressful situations.


133 posted on 08/30/2017 11:39:05 AM PDT by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8
It will be more complicated than that. What about a person that says they are transgender, does not act out on it- no surgery plan, no cross dressing. No other legitimate reason to discharge them. Then what? This will all have to be determined by the review process.

Give them a choice of an immediate dickectomy and medical discharge or cut off all hormone shots and wait for the new manboobs to start sagging. /s
134 posted on 08/30/2017 11:45:44 AM PDT by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
I answer your questions but you don't answer mine

Does the president have the power to make cross dressing a UCMJ violation and also render prescribed punishment for said offense immediate discharge?

135 posted on 08/30/2017 12:37:10 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: central_va
You have answered none of my questions - for obvious reasons.

As to yours...I am not a lawyer...but contrary to your worldview, the UCMJ was not created by a dictatorial president, but rather by CONGRESS...as all laws should be. Recently, however, it has been changed by a 'pen and a phone'...ie by executive order. I suppose anything is possible with an executive order, but that action of making law without congress is, IMHO, not in accordance with the constitution and is a practice that should be stopped.

However, I am positive that pre-Barry, cross-dressing was a violation of UCMJ, so any action to now make it illegal would be an undoing of his unconstitutional behavior and would be appropriate...but it will never happen.

Barry didn't feminize the military in one fell swoop on his first day of office. Instead, he waited for 'studies' and 'recommendations' - this is because Barry is not an idiot. For similar reasons, Trump can't undo Barry's work in an instant either.

136 posted on 08/30/2017 2:26:16 PM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sam 911

Yes I bet that is what they do. It would take a little time to get every single one transitioned out of the military though some here think they can just kick them to the curb today.

I don’t know how many transgenders are in the military now, a media article the other day mentioned a couple thousand? The numbers I have seen that came from the military are far lower. I guess they will determine that with their review along with the plan to get them discharged.


137 posted on 08/30/2017 3:00:36 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

If Barry removed cross dressing violations from the UCMJ then Trump can put it back in. What about the political ramifications of allowing this to go on? Trump looks really bad condoning this lunacy.


138 posted on 08/30/2017 6:53:49 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44; BillyBoy; sickoflibs

I hear you, legal jujitsu to keep some judge from interfering.

But I don’t know, could be you’re rationalizing.

I just feels like we’re getting jerked around.


139 posted on 09/01/2017 12:16:22 AM PDT by Impy (Anyone who votes to raise taxes deserves to get rabies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: central_va

>>Trump looks really bad condoning this lunacy.

Yep.


140 posted on 09/02/2017 8:12:49 PM PDT by HLPhat (It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson