Posted on 09/08/2017 10:46:48 AM PDT by Cheerio
FULL TITLE:Kobach: It Appears That Out-of-State Voters Changed the Outcome of the New Hampshire U.S. Senate Race
For years, the mainstream media has ignored the problem of voter fraud and belittled those of us who are trying to do something about it. And when secretaries of state like me identify cases of fraud, we are told that the number of incidents of voter fraud is too insignificant to matter.
Now, however, facts have come to light that indicate that a pivotal, close election was likely changed through voter fraud on November 8, 2016: New Hampshires U.S. Senate Seat, and perhaps also New Hampshires four electoral college votes in the presidential election.
New Hampshire is one of fifteen states that allow same-day voter registration. The benefit of same-day registration is that it allows a person who has procrastinated or has forgotten to register to nonetheless cast a ballot on election day. The downside of same-day registration is that it does not allow the state time to assess the eligibility of the voter. A volunteer poll worker simply accepts a modicum of identification and takes the voter at his word that hes a U.S. citizen resident of the state who is eligible to vote.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Too late to contest the election? Would any of you REALLY fight on Ayott’s behalf? 6 year term.
Maybe 60,000 college students in NH. Rough guess, 50% or less from out of state. Largest out of state contributor, probably Massachusetts, followed by NY and Connecticut. Because of their age, unmarried status, and their states being a lock for Clinton, it makes sense that the great majority of same day registrants who were college students would have voted Dem.
The political party is NOT “Democratic”.
All that is needed for an out-of-state college student to vote in New Hampshire is any driver license and an affidavit of domicile on the day of the election. No real proof whatsoever of anything.
Easy enough to investigate the affidavits to see if they were really college students. But who will do it?
http://sos.nh.gov/CollegeStudent.aspx
I keep saying that all we need to do is require a Social Security number of every voter when they cast their vote. Then hook a smartphone up to the SS records and have poll workers verify age, permanent address, and citizenship. Problem solved, and you could do away with registration altogether.
If someone’s dead, that will show up.
If someone’s permanent address isn’t in the precinct, they should have voted absentee in the place they consider their permanent address, or they should have changed their permanent address on record at SS.
If someone’s not a citizen, that can be verified at SS.
And if someone tries to vote someone else’s SSN, a picture voter ID card would make doing so difficult since the wrong name, age, and address would come back tied to that SSN.
Tie your vote to your SSN and fraud will become very difficult. Plus, a count of all SSN’s checked in each precinct could be compared with the total votes cast in the precinct to prevent the addition of a box of fraudulent ballots.
That leaves only making sure that electronic voting has a paper back up system, as it should.
Or, we could go the purple finger route, I suppose.
This is HUGH news! I’m sure the MSM is going to to be all over this. /s
Might be inconvenient if he did. If he dug deep into it then judging by the numbers Kobach would likely find that the large majority of those same day voter registrants were college students from out of state, who could register to vote in New Hampshire but did not meet the legal qualifications of a resident in order to get new drivers license or car registrations.
At first I was upset that Kris Kobach didn’t get a job in the administration. Now I’m starting to see that he’ll be much more effective where he is. Definitely one to watch . . .
See #24
But that’s what they call themselves up NH way it seems.
There is a greater chance to be struck by lightning than that there has ever been a single case of vote fraud in the history of the United States. There is not even a smidgen of a chance that there was vote fraud in New Hampshire.
In my life I have worked in most of the South American countries. They are know for corruption, but I have to tell the people the only difference between them and the USA is we hide it better. Now I am not so sure the Democrats do even bother to hide their fraudulent voting any more. In fact I think they are proud of it
Sessions only cares about out of state voters who illegally cast ballots if their Vicodin prescription is either out of date or is not in the original container.
Probably just the guy that made the chart.
“The proof was that thousands voted with out-of-state drivers licenses and most of them havent applied for either NH driver licenses or car registration.”
Thanks.
That ought to have been in the first paragraph.
Followed by how it’s known they aren’t out of state students.
Constitution of the New Hampshire Democratic Party
https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/d6eb2e_23addeb072764104a2d14367c4dc740e.pdf
I see. So they are not part of the Democrat party it sees. And there is nothing democratic about either of them.
I’s say they are full democrats, just using a slightly different name.
JMO
Sure they are. They just don’t know their own name. The national party is Democrat. But then, there’s a lot democRats don’t know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.