Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Can Now Jail People For Misusing Gender Pronouns
The Daily Caller News Foundation ^ | 10/06/2017 | Anders Hagstrom

Posted on 10/06/2017 12:06:05 PM PDT by ForYourChildren

California can now start jailing people that refuse to use the preferred gender pronouns of nursing home residents after Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown signed the bill Thursday.

The law’s effect is limited to nursing homes and other long-term care facilities, but mandates that those who “willfully and repeatedly” refuse “to use a transgender resident’s preferred name or pronouns” can be slapped with a $1,000 fine and up to one year in prison, according to the California Heath and Safety code.

Known as the “LGBT Senior Bill Of Rights,” the legislation also requires nursing homes and care facilities to allow residents to use the bathroom of their choice, regardless of biological sex. The bill’s author, state Sen. Scott Weiner, argues that religious views don’t hold weight in public areas.

“Everyone is entitled to their religious view,” Wiener said. “But when you enter the public space, when you are running an institution, you are in a workplace, you are in a civil setting, and you have to follow the law.”

Wiener also released a statement thanking Brown for signing the bill.

{..snip..}

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycallernewsfoundation.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: jail; misusinggender; tranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2017 12:06:05 PM PDT by ForYourChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

This won’t end at nursing homes.

They have set up precedence for this type of law.

It will go all the way, everywhere, anyone.


2 posted on 10/06/2017 12:06:57 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

What about the 80 year old lady who doesn’t WANT some old guys using the women’s restroom? Doesn’t she have any rights?

I can’t wait until someone is sentenced to prison on this law, and appeals the conviction to the SCOTUS.


3 posted on 10/06/2017 12:07:46 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Clear violation of the 1st Amendment right to free speech.


4 posted on 10/06/2017 12:07:51 PM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

“But when you enter the public space, when you are running an institution, you are in a workplace, you are in a civil setting, and you have to follow the law.”
...

unless we’re talking about illegal immigration


5 posted on 10/06/2017 12:07:57 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Forcing someone to use a certain form of speech: how is this not unconstitutional?


6 posted on 10/06/2017 12:08:23 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Mine is “Your highest lordship, majestic el Heffe”

Refuse to use it and I will send you to JAIL!

+++++

to use a transgender resident’s preferred name or pronouns


7 posted on 10/06/2017 12:09:17 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Lunacy on the hoof.


8 posted on 10/06/2017 12:12:15 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Welcome to the Hotel Kalifornia.


9 posted on 10/06/2017 12:12:24 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

“Known as the “LGBT Senior Bill Of Rights,”

also known as the “Forcing Sane People to Say Insane and Untrue Things” bill.


10 posted on 10/06/2017 12:13:15 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren
No way would this law survive in the Federal courts.
11 posted on 10/06/2017 12:14:32 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (ObamaCare Works For Those Who Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

‘WHATEVER’ works for me.


12 posted on 10/06/2017 12:14:33 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

There are several problem with this law. It’s been fought at the supreme Court level that people do NOT loose their civil rights when they walk through the doors of an institution. Jay Seculow won the cases where religious rights were being nullified by state schools. Furthermore, the
Federal Attorney General declared only yesterday that employment anti discrimination laws in the work place don’t apply to trans genders in the workplace.

I do hope action is taken against this law because the civil Rights of all are being improperly nullified for the preference of a few. Reverse discrimination.


13 posted on 10/06/2017 12:15:33 PM PDT by PrairieLady2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
"Forcing someone to use a certain form of speech: how is this not unconstitutional?"

It's clearly a violation of the first amendment. Another's delusion does not dictate my reality.

14 posted on 10/06/2017 12:16:03 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Well, you can’t destroy the 2nd amendment without destroying the 1st. And these people won’t stop until both are gone!


15 posted on 10/06/2017 12:16:15 PM PDT by ItsOnlyDaryl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

THX1138 or what?


16 posted on 10/06/2017 12:16:34 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

I’m just glad there are no pressing issues here in CA for the legislature and governor to deal with so they can spend time keeping us safe with laws like this.....


17 posted on 10/06/2017 12:16:45 PM PDT by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Presicely why there is a second ammendment.


18 posted on 10/06/2017 12:17:26 PM PDT by mindburglar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrairieLady2

19 posted on 10/06/2017 12:17:41 PM PDT by IWontSubmit (2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

The only reason any of this stands - the sexual orientation, gender identity discrimination - is due to one executive order amendment 13087 that must be undone.


20 posted on 10/06/2017 12:18:02 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson