Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mississippi Supreme Court to decide if boy’s legal ‘biological’ parents are two lesbians
Life Site News ^ | December 8, 2017 | Doug Mainwaring

Posted on 12/09/2017 9:15:48 AM PST by EdnaMode

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: EdnaMode
Liberals love science. Except when they don't.

Egg-zackly. They say they're champions of science until it runs afoul of their exasperating, unfounded dogmas.

21 posted on 12/09/2017 9:35:31 AM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

That’s what Cat Cora did. Or Cathy Cora. She’s from Mississippi.


22 posted on 12/09/2017 9:35:33 AM PST by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Once the judges decide that two lesbians can be biological parents of a boy, despite the fact that neither of them has a Y chromosome to actually confer male gender, I want them to consider the speed of light.

Space exploration would be really cool, except that we are forever imprisoned in this solar system by the unbreakable speed limit imposed by the speed of light. If the judges would just declare that the speed of light is not a legal limit and that humans can go as fast as they want, the universe would be open to us. Star Trek could be reality.


23 posted on 12/09/2017 9:37:32 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

The answer here No a flat out “no” and is simple biology.

Female = egg

Male = Sperm

Thus: egg + sperm = life

Therefore: egg + egg = zero.


24 posted on 12/09/2017 9:37:48 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

“These people are trying to create a problem that doesn’t exist. “

They are crazy people. The one thing crazy people can’t put up with is people who see a different reality than they see. They will force those others to see the same reality. This is how they make their own reality real. If they fail, then the fantasy world they are trying to live in breaks down. It would be like finding out instead of standing on rock you are standing on Jello and in danger of falling. When you fall it is the same as dying. So, you will work hard on convincing the world that you are standing on rock.

I was at a dinner party where a few gay guys were attending when their marriage bill was defeated in Florida. One of them went absolutely apeshit crazy. He threatened to go out instantly and commit violence against some people who were visibly on the other side of the issue. (Thank goodness they weren’t there.) The only way to deal with people like that is to get them out of your life. I never attended another party or even spoke to the other people I had met there.

Unfortunately, once the courts are involved we don’t have an option just to avoid these people. They are using the enforcement arm of society to make people bake their cakes and give them corroborating paperwork like marriage licenses. The scary thing is, they can’t declare victory and just be satisfied with a few wins. They must keep on until they have remade the world into the image they fantasize is real.


25 posted on 12/09/2017 9:38:26 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gibsosa

There are two children involved, an earlier adopted son and the invitro boy. The biological mom has married a man, as of 2013 when the two women separated and she & her husband are raising the boys. The other women was not on the adoption papers either so she has no legal standing and is suing to obtain visitation rights and part custody.

http://wjtv.com/2015/12/03/same-sex-court-battle-over-marriage-children/


26 posted on 12/09/2017 9:41:40 AM PST by JayGalt (Let Trump Be Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

That kid will be a mess!

Where’s king Solomon when you need him


27 posted on 12/09/2017 9:42:22 AM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (WINNING! !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
the law might make her a parent, but no court or lawyer in the world can make her a “biological” anything to that kid.

Don't worry, this will all go out the window as soon as the parents need child support.

And if that happens, I'm all in favor of forcing the traitor to support his kid.

28 posted on 12/09/2017 9:45:13 AM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (Prayers for our country and President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Oh what tangled webs we weave.

And it is the poor kid who will suffer. In more ways than one.


29 posted on 12/09/2017 9:46:47 AM PST by pinkandgreenmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

30 posted on 12/09/2017 9:47:32 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsosa

——I made the mistake of going to the site——

Wow...you aren’t kidding...

Both look like they will be in prison at same point...


31 posted on 12/09/2017 9:57:16 AM PST by Popman (My sin was great, Your love was greater  What could separate us now…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Poor kid will be sending father’s day cards to a turkey baster.


32 posted on 12/09/2017 10:00:13 AM PST by Beagle8U (Wake up and smell the Covfef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Arkansas just approved the banning of “father” and “mother” on a child’s birth certificate. How screwed up can a nation be? This screwed up.


33 posted on 12/09/2017 10:00:32 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

It seems to me that a simple DNA test of the child and both of the women would answer the question quite simply. The DNA of the child and the birth mother would be close, while that of the non-birth mother not be, with maybe a few random markers being similar due to general ethnicity factors. End of “biological” discussion. And, since she never signed on as an “adoptive” parent, it’s “too bad, so sad” for her!

The only complication I can see is if the “anonymous” sperm donor was a close relative (brother, father, like that) of the woman who didn’t bear the child. Such a happenstance would place the non-birth mother’s DNA closer, given the familial closeness.

We all know, of course, who will be the winners in this case: each of the women’s lawyers. Everyone else involved are clear losers, mentally and/or financially.


34 posted on 12/09/2017 10:04:52 AM PST by ssaftler ("Tolerant liberals" is an oxymoron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode
Did the 'other parent' made her eggs into sperm? If she did..yes, if not, the boy doesn't have her DNA...

I'm only a teen, but I get it...

35 posted on 12/09/2017 10:16:42 AM PST by ConservaTeen (Islam is Not the Religion of Peace, but The religion of Pedophilia...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Actually, the court will get a chance to recognize truth or deny it. They won’t decide anything.


36 posted on 12/09/2017 10:23:29 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Seriously? They need a judge to figure this out??


37 posted on 12/09/2017 10:30:40 AM PST by WKUHilltopper (WKU 2016 Boca Raton Bowl Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry; EdnaMode
Hi, Cherry. Sure, homosexuals can breed: via artificial reproductive technologies. By which I do NOT mean truly therapeutic interventions which enable a man and woman to achieve pregnancy via intercourse, by treating some physical disability of the man or the woman and restoring their normal fertility.

I DO mean, technologies which substitute a laboratory or clinical procedure for sexual intercourse as the means to achieve the inception of new life.

This is reason #984376 why such technologies -- for instance, artificial insemination or IVF --- are wrong: for anyone, male or female, gay or straight.

38 posted on 12/09/2017 10:33:35 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("God bless the child who's got his own." - Billie Holliday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Okay, this has gone past weird and straight to icky. And in Mississippi. I would have expected this headline about California or New York.


39 posted on 12/09/2017 10:41:02 AM PST by Bernard (If we could tax Stupid, Congress could balance the budget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode
Ajudicate biology?

What's next, ruling that the Mississippi government owns all the gravity "natural resource" in the state, so the legislature can charge a usage fee for it?

-PJ

40 posted on 12/09/2017 10:41:39 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson