Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forget Collusion. Can Mueller Prove Russia Committed Cyberespionage? If not, what’s the point?
National Review ^ | December 11, 2017 | Andrew C. McCarthy

Posted on 12/11/2017 10:29:57 AM PST by billorites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Hotlanta Mike

Xavier Becerra is in deep poop.


21 posted on 12/11/2017 11:10:35 AM PST by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: billorites
The rationale for Robert Mueller’s appointment as special counsel is that Russia conducted a cyberespionage attack

I thought the rationale was Comey set it up to have a special counsel appointed with a reason not needed.
22 posted on 12/11/2017 11:27:15 AM PST by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

Please stop it. Mueller is NOT working with Trump.


23 posted on 12/11/2017 11:31:03 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

And you know this how?


24 posted on 12/11/2017 11:36:25 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
There's a simple reason why the FBI accepted the CrowdStrike finding and never insisted on examining the DNC server. The refusal of the DNC to turn over their computer hardware was prima facie evidence that there was no crime.

I side with your conclusions. However, they don't have to turn over the hardware. If they want to be co-operative, they could have provided an image of the server or pertinent log files. This was a bulk release of emails, so it was either insider or a hacker that gained admin privileges. It could also be something like the Equifax hack when a crucial system didn't get patched. I haven't heard of any reports that puts that theory high on my list.

25 posted on 12/11/2017 11:44:36 AM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Mueller and the Obama/Hillary Minions he hired are only there to look through Trump’s dirty laundry ,but the only problem is they haven’t any dirty laundry yet to look through


26 posted on 12/11/2017 11:46:28 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

He should be indicted by AG Sessions...


27 posted on 12/11/2017 11:53:57 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

My recollection is there was a public pissing contest between the FBI and the chair of the DNC at the time, when this last garnered any press coverage. The FBI claimed they contacted the DNC when they first heard about the potential hacking, from where I don’t recall. The FBI claimed they were ignored, if not rebuffed. DWS claimed the DNC was never contacted, at least not at the appropriate levels.

Ultimately, the only suppposed evidence put forth that they were hacked, came from a 3rd party company called Crowd Strike, indicating the FBI was pretty much cut out from investigating directly, at any point in time. Around this same time, Wikileaks revealed US agencies such as the CIA had the ability to mimic attacks as originating from elsewhere.


28 posted on 12/11/2017 11:54:16 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Muller et al can’t even articulate what the supposed crime is.


29 posted on 12/11/2017 12:11:15 PM PST by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Exactly right, how can there be “collusion” if there is no crime? Every day it becomes more obvious that this is and has always been as Trump says nothing more than a “witch hunt” with the aim of impeaching the President and negating the election. A new low for the left.


30 posted on 12/11/2017 12:26:08 PM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Once a NeverTrumper, always a NeverTrumper.

THE POINT IS -- this so-called investigation is ENTIRELY BASED on Clinton-funded oppo research (smears) compiled on Clinton's dime, and ALL ALLEGATIONS contined within are utter BULL****.

31 posted on 12/11/2017 1:12:58 PM PST by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: billorites
Mueller hasn't even attempted to analyse the DNC server.

If Mueller was conducting a real investigation, that would have been one of his very first moves. But it wasn't.

This fatally undermines not only any criminal charges, but any impeachment charges as well.

32 posted on 12/11/2017 1:19:56 PM PST by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Please stop it. Mueller is NOT working with Trump

_______________________________________________

I agree.. I don’t know where people get that silliness.

Mueller is working to impeach Trump because he dissed the FBI and Comey....repeat it over and over


33 posted on 12/11/2017 1:51:21 PM PST by SPRINK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The most important angle to that story is how the FBI got involved in the first place. Did they get involved based on media reports, or did someone at the DNC actually report the matter to the FBI?

The DNC discovered the leak/hack in late April 2016. The DNC/Hillary Campaign/Perkins Coie hired the cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike and it began monitoring the servers on May 5th. Debbie Wasserman Schultz did not get around to informing other DNC officials of the leak/hack until July 2016, and only because the story uncovering it was about to appear in the WaPo. In June 2017, 0bama's Director of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson testified before congress that the DNC rebuffed FBI help, and in her book published last month Donna Brazile wrote that both Susan Rice and Eric Holder told her the DNC refused to cooperate with the FBI. My guess is that the FBI only learned of the matter in July 2016, with the publication of the WaPo story.

34 posted on 12/11/2017 1:53:50 PM PST by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Oh, and just coincidentally, July 2016 is when Hillary hired Fusion GPS to concoct the Russian dossier story.


35 posted on 12/11/2017 1:57:15 PM PST by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Same NeverTrumper:

On Strzok, Let’s Wait for the Evidence
National Review | December 7, 2017 | Andrew McCarthy
Posted on 12/07/2017 8:14:03 AM PST by billorites
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3611546/posts


36 posted on 12/11/2017 2:04:25 PM PST by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: billorites

Russia dindu nuffin.


37 posted on 12/11/2017 2:19:46 PM PST by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson