[taxcontrol]

Demonstrably unconstitutional as it establishes an additional test for the office of President.

[Flick Lives]

Demonstrably unconstitutional as it establishes an additional test for the office of President.

---

Ding, ding. We have a winner.

[jazusamo]

My thought also.

[MortMan]

You said it better than I could have.

[AndyTheBear]

Demonstrably unconstitutional as it establishes an additional test for the office of President.

Yes, especially since it would dox anyone doing business with Trump for politically motivated harassment.

[catnipman]

“Demonstrably unconstitutional as it establishes an additional test for the office of President.”

yep.

[DoodleDawg]

Demonstrably unconstitutional as it establishes an additional test for the office of President.

States do that all the time. Most states have a minimum standard candidates must meet in order to be on the ballot, usually a specific number of signatures or something like that. That's why some fringe candidates for presidents can be on the ballot in some states and not in others. No court I'm aware of has ruled that to be an additional test for president.