Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strac6

I thought a warrant for surveillance was John Doe could only be used against John Doe. The argument to the judge was Carter Page was acting as an Agent for Russia.

Was the warrant expanded to include other US Citizens? If so, upon what basis was it expanded? And against whom?


78 posted on 02/02/2018 7:39:31 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Bryan24

My understanding (and someone correct me if I’m wrong) is that the warrant is just for John Doe, but if John Doe is on the phone with Trump all day, that call is monitored and they know what Trump said, too. That’s what all the talk about “unmasking” is.

In the records of the wiretap, Trump’s name (since he is a US citizen and presumed innocent) is known, but redacted. But it looks like the 0vomit WH went nuts with unmasking. I assume that they were trying to find any conversations that Trump or other significant people close to him were involved in, in hopes of gathering some dirt they would be able to use against him.


90 posted on 02/02/2018 8:08:03 PM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan24

Didn’t have to be expanded.

If warrant to tap A leads to recorded conversation wherein B tells A about a crime B has committed, it can be used against B.


101 posted on 02/03/2018 6:09:43 AM PST by Strac6 ("Mrs. Strac, Pilatus, and Sig Sauer: All the fun things in my life are Swiss!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson