Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Department violated Michael Cohen's constitutional rights just by seizing his records [tr]
Daily Mail ^ | April 10, 2018 | Staff

Posted on 04/10/2018 6:26:05 PM PDT by Enchante

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Enchante

Yes and that one is the one for Field Agents.


41 posted on 04/10/2018 8:31:03 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

Good points all.

I was glad to hear him speak out but feel he may just be another Clinton mole.


42 posted on 04/10/2018 8:31:34 PM PDT by Califreak (Take Me Back To Constantinople)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

While this is going on, the GOP is nowhere to be found and refuse to protect the Republican President. They are despicable.


43 posted on 04/10/2018 8:38:33 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

It’s hard to believe that Mastermind Mueller would make such a mistake, yet here we are with THE MOST SACROSANCT
of rights...the attorney/client privilege...being trampled.

When I first heard about the home invasion, I thought, boy,
Mueller must know of some arcane law that allows him to do that. Come to find out...there is no such arcane law and Muller should be made to pay for that blatant disregard.

I think, now, his days are numbered. And it won’t be by President Trump firing him.


44 posted on 04/10/2018 8:46:56 PM PDT by Maris Crane (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks Enchante.

45 posted on 04/10/2018 8:55:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Maris Crane

Doubtful, unfortunately. i think for a variety of reasons this horse has legs. Just saying....


46 posted on 04/10/2018 8:56:03 PM PDT by cazmandeuce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

LOL....everyone in that pic looks photoshopped in.


47 posted on 04/10/2018 9:06:10 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Maris Crane

Praying you are right!!


48 posted on 04/10/2018 9:07:05 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; ransomnote; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; ...

p


49 posted on 04/10/2018 9:09:21 PM PDT by bitt (We do not need the electric chair - we need electric bleachers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: proust

Good. Let the coup leaders open the door to a full investigation and exposure of the Lolita Express.


50 posted on 04/10/2018 9:18:44 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

there’s an article here on FR, yesterday I think, written by a well-spoken attny (in that I could read and understand most of the legaleze) who defended a position that a ‘taint’ team isn’t sufficient, that they needed to have a “master” or other court person doing the searching and sealing everything for a judge’s eyes, not agents. To preserve attorney-client privileged communications which are not preserved under a ‘taint’ team situation. A ‘taint’ team can take months to go through material, dragging it well beyond midterms, with no one overriding that they only review material specifically asked for under the warrant.

In the meantime, the hooker’s attny is burning up the interview circuit. I hope they cuff him for extortion.


51 posted on 04/10/2018 9:45:58 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

#4. This is bigger than Epstein’s plane. I’ll trade Epstein and Clinton for Mueller Rosenstein and Weissman.


52 posted on 04/10/2018 10:09:06 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Dershowitz said on Fox that he had a prearranged meeting with White House staff on the topic of the Middle East and Israel, a subject he is passionate about, and Donald Trump invited him to dinner afterwards. I can’t help but think some talk came up about the raid. I hope he gave Trump some good tips.


53 posted on 04/10/2018 10:10:50 PM PDT by KittyKares (Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
he now has the ability to violate ANY attorney-client privilege to go after the Deep State: literally to the point of extinction. :-)

And who is going to do PDJT's bidding? He has no Justice Department or FBI to investigate anybody!

54 posted on 04/10/2018 10:15:07 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks Enchante. Headline next week, Mueller raids homes and offices of Trump dinner guests?

55 posted on 04/10/2018 10:15:55 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enchante
Whatever happened to Executive Privilege? Or does that only apply in certain cases and not others?


56 posted on 04/10/2018 11:02:20 PM PDT by magooey (The Mandate of Heaven resides in the hearts of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Maybe that’s why he’s cozying up to Trump.


57 posted on 04/11/2018 12:36:11 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Perhaps.

But the major Constitutional issue began when Rosenstein appointed Mueller and going forward when he amended Mueller’s mandate, after the warrant on Manafort’s house

Someone feel free to correct me, but.....

There has to have been a crime...there wasn’t.

For some reason, the DOJ investigating the “crime” would have to show some type of conflict of interest...they can’t, since there was no crime

After the unnecessary warrant on Manafort’s home and the seizing of privileged records, Rosenstein made amendments to Mueller’s mandate....not sure he can move the goal posts in the middle of the game.

And, now it’s devolved into a porn star and the President’s personal lawyer. Can’t wait to get the info in the affidavit for that warrant. Hard to imagine how much bullsh*t is in there.


58 posted on 04/11/2018 12:42:09 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

Not true.

Although, at one time, having a law degree was one of the criteria, along with having a degree in Accounting, for example, was another criteria.

That “lawyer” thing came from Hoover’s days when all he wanted were, Nerds, like him to be able to carry guns and badges. One of the biggest problems with the FBI is they don’t hire “cops”, they hire college kids, who don’t know sh*t, but think they’re smarter than everyone else in the room. Except for a very small handful, when you meet or work with a good agent, chances are they were a cop, beforehand.


59 posted on 04/11/2018 12:56:17 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Mueller, the RINO’s and the RAT’s are desperate to find dirt on Trump, and have resorted to seizing Trump’s attorney’s files to find the dirt - even if it is illegal. Who is going to hold them accountable for illegal activity?


60 posted on 04/11/2018 3:06:48 AM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson