[aimhigh]

Since these judges can't be fired, this country is toast.

[Ciaphas Cain]

I’ve a length of boiled and stretched hemp rope that sez you’re wrong.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Citizenship is REQUIRED for voting.

[backwoods-engineer]

Sick of these tyrannical district judges who hate our country and want illegal aliens voting in our elections.

[fieldmarshaldj]

There must be recourse for removing lawless thugs in robes.

[LegendHasIt]

Once again reinforcing my assessment that unelected judges should be allowed to ‘serve’ no more than a one year appointment.

[Fungi]

. No criticism is allowed for the obvious reasons.

[UnwashedPeasant]

Corrupt judges can be impeached by Congress. This is basic check and balance, and it is the duty of Congress to do so.

https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/impeachments-federal-judges

[Taxman]

They can be impeached and removed FRom office!

Sounds to me like this “Judge” is ripe for impeachment and removal!

[Skywise]

The ruling is nonsensical. If the, so-called, judge is claiming that proving citizenship is too much of a burden to infringing civil rights then requiring a background check to purchase a gun is just as much, if not more a violation of infringing civil rights.

If the judge is claiming that there’s no need for a law because there’s no provable instance of the crime cocuring - that’s facetious on its face. Might as well say there’s no need for a law against murder because no one’s been killed in the county this year.

Worse - you MUST PROVE RESIDENCY to vote which is tantamount to citizenship. Where’s the excessive burden?

I demand the judge go back to school to learn basic logic skills.

[lee martell]

Can Kobach appeal this ‘judges’ goofy decision?

[alexandriagreen]

Hopefully they appeal and this goes up to the Supreme Court if need be

[pepsionice]

Then she won’t mind allowing the same list of registered voters (with potential illegals) be jurors in trials. Watch how quick that gets knocked down.

[a fool in paradise]

So is it unconstitutional to require proof of citizenship to receive welfare? To appear on a jury?

If the non-citizen can vote then why is it still illegal for non-citizens to donate money to campaigns?

[Pollster1]

Step 1 is new federal legislation to fix this. Step 2 is for the US Senate to streamline judicial confirmations so that we can fill the courts with judges who believe in the rule of law.

[cashless]

Roll over Kansas. Roll over. Good boy. Now fetch Kansas, fetch. Good boy. Now lay down and have your state laws subject to the whim of an activist judge, Kansas. Lay down. Good boy.

Until states meet in convention and amend the constitution to elect judges based on party, we will continue to be assaulted by overt and covert Progressive Socialists who think “ for the people, by the people” is just a quaint quote of another old dead guy.

[Robert DeLong]

"Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office. Although the legal orthodoxy is that judges cannot be removed from office except by impeachment by the House of Representatives followed by conviction by the Senate, several legal scholars, including William Rehnquist, Saikrishna Prakash, and Steven D. Smith, have argued that the Good Behaviour Clause may, in theory, permit removal by way of a writ of scire facias filed before a federal court, without resort to impeachment

In English law, a writ of scire facias (Latin, meaning literally "make known") was a writ founded upon some judicial record directing the sheriff to make the record known to a specified party, and requiring the defendant to show cause why the party bringing the writ should not be able to cite that record in his own interest, or why, in the case of letters patent and grants, the patent or grant should not be annulled and vacated. In the United States, the writ has been abolished under federal law but may still be available in some state legal systems.

The actual writ of scire facias has been suspended in the Federal district courts by Rule 81(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but the rule still allows for granting relief formerly available through scire facias by prosecuting a civil action.

SOURCE

[bgill]

Hey, Kim and Vlad should have the right to vote in US elections.

[kiryandil]

Look!

A federal judge-president who has a hemp deficiency!

[FLT-bird]

She needs to be overruled - with prejudice. The USSC needs to step up and issue a ruling here.

[centurion316]

I recently went to the Kansas DMV to renew my drivers license. I went on the day that my license expired (hadn’t noticed that it was expiring. Knowing about the RealID Law, I grabbed my birth certificate because I knew that it was required for RealID. RealID is the Federal Law to improve airline security. Without RealID, you can’t board an airplane. To get that logo on your driver’s license, you must present your birth certificate or passport (unexpired). I grabbed a photocopy certificate, not the original. I didn’t get my RealID license, rather a generic license not eligible for TSA. I have to go back to the DMV with the right documentation to get my RealID.

This is the same requirement for voting registration, identical. No one is challenging the RealID Federal requirements and you can bet that recent immigrants certainly have a RealID for those frequent trips back to the old country. This is part of the Democrat scheme to undermine the integrity of our elections.