This is the video referenced in the article. It’s important to watch and listen to her own words.
She’s really quite brilliant and the liberal hysteria about her is ridiculous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yjTEdZ81lI&t=342s
People who make sweeping generalizations about people they don’t even know are usually “full of” something too.
She is one of those gal judges who will “grow” and “evolve” with the role. She is full of “compassion” and “for the children”.
*****************************
Condescend much?
Bulla
Her track record is solid right
Her idol is Anton Scalia
scary, grow into a flamer lib..scary
She is a prettier Susan O’Connor, I believe.
My female gut is saying...beware.
“She is one of those gal judges who will “grow” and “evolve” with the role. She is full of “compassion” and “for the children”. “
Trump should not nominate her. She is a so called “so called conservative professor” at Notre Dame a very liberal college, that even covered up religious artifacts to suit Obama. There is no or little record of her decisions from the bench.Did she go to Haiti to adopt children to enhance her resume’ with the MSM? Why not adopt poor American children, of which there are plenty. How will she stand on affirmative action and open borders? We know how the Catholic Church stands on these issues. Is she up to the everyday battles of the major decisions facing our country or will she fold as Sandra Day O’Connor? We need a stronger pick.
I am afraid Trump will cave and bring in a woman. Best case scenario is Trump nominates a Neil Gorsuch clone. My theme is no libertarians (Mike Lee) and no women. Since the courts are the Dems go to branch of government there is no margin for error in the Supreme Court. Who is that gasbag Senator from Maine? Olympia Snowe? This is when this senile critter gets to shine for the TV cameras. Unfortunately, as a swing vote she might influence Trump in the wrong direction.
Very qualified, very smart. I don’t look at her like a Sandra Day O’Conner. The selection process, thanks to Trump is now better. Republican presidents in the past spent 5 minutes picking a judge. Trump does everything the right way.
I think Barrett would be a great pick, and send the dems in a apoplexy.
Unfortunately, you may be right. Two of her kids are Haitian that she adopted. Looks to me like a lot of liberal virtue signaling. Also, as a very devout Catholic, how does she stand on the death penalty and the current Fake Pope's effort to destroy national borders? Particularly, how does she stand on the President's legal right to regulate immigration? I'd at least like to see her spend some time on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals where she could build a track record of decisions.
Your source and reasoning for this assertion comes from ...?
Very strange considering only men have evolved on the Supreme Court. Sandra did not evolve. She was always moderate. The guys evolved big time.
I am a woman and have to agree. No more women “evolving with compassion”.
She would also loosen the stranglehold of Ivy League educated justices.
That’s the conclusion you came to after reading this? She sounded like a Freeper in this speech and clerked for Scalia, you sexist pig.