Posted on 10/11/2018 7:40:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Was Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony against Judge Brett Kavanaugh a total con job? It had all the earmarks of an 11th-hour ambush, facilitated by the dismissal of the lack of corroborating evidence, a predictable presumption of guilt ginned up by a media that feeds sensationalism and mob rule, and the calculated protection of the impenetrable shield of the #MeToo movement. It almost worked.
There are also fingerprints of a Deep State political hit job. The Steele Dossier and Kavanaugh accusation have a lot in common, each being based on uncorroborated charges involving sex -- tailor-made to foment a media circus, which is now the tail that wags the political dog in America.
To better understand these destructive forces, we need to follow the lawyers just like we need to follow the money. Flanked on each side of Ford at her October 4 testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee were attorneys Debra Katz and Michael Bromwich.
Michael Bromwich’s selection to Ford’s legal team may be specifically related to his long-standing ties with the FBI and DOJ. Interestingly, he happens to be an attorney for Andrew McCabe, the former FBI director fired for lying to investigators from his own agency. Out of all the lawyers in the most lawyered city in America, why would Ford choose him? Maybe Bromwich was chosen for Ford as the one attorney uniquely positioned to influence a final anticipated FBI investigation through McCabe’s remaining supporters within the FBI.
Debra Katz, introduced to Ford by Senator Diane Feinstein, is more than just a lawyer. An early major fundraiser for Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid, Katz is also a left-wing street activist involved with various resist Trump efforts. She serves as vice-chair of the Project on Government Oversight, a “core grantee” of George Soros’s Open Society Foundation,
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
For all their effort, they turned what would been about a 54-46 confirmation into a 50-48 confirmation. They also probably lost an additional 3-6 seats in the Senate.
On the plus side, they threw tons of raw meat to the frothing, angry mob that is their base, and alarmed and energized an untold number of formerly apolitical and apathetic citizens against them.
This a great article showing how Ford changed her timeline and WHY she changed it:
https://www.wnd.com/2018/10/uh-dr-ford-about-that-trip-to-the-safeway/
The devil’s in the details.
Yes, of course he is involved. Now, the truth is coming out. A complete set-up. That woman, stood up and took an oath to tell the truth, and then sat down and lied, completely lied about everything.
Fascinating article, thanks for sharing.
OTOH, I doubt that any FReeper is the least bit surprised to read about all the background lawyers, FBI connections on this Kavanaugh deal.
In general, I agree with your post #2 regarding the effects of what the rats did. I only hope that we are not being too optimistic.
Hopefully our new AG will go for the juggler next time.
Another problem with that Safeway encounter with Mark Judge:
If the experience with Kavanagh traumatized Dr. Fraud to the degree that she buried so deep in her memory that it took 30+ years to retrieve, how could she remember it just a few weeks after the alleged assault?
Total orchestrated hit job funded by deep state Soros type Left wingers utilizing a Leftist nutty professor willing to be used for the cause understanding she would reap the benefits as a newly anointed Anita Hill figure who is able to increase her net worth 10x what she would have at the university pay rate.
All of these stories assume one fact that is not in evidence, that an attack actually happened and is not the fruit of a recovered memory, which could also be a manufactured memory. Her own writings should make this a line of inquiry. I would say the more accurate statement would be that “she believes an attack happened.”
Great article, thank you for that link, Cuban Leaf...
Good one
If the experience with Kavanaugh traumatized Dr. Fraud to the degree that she buried so deep in her memory that it took 30+ years to retrieve, how could she remember it just a few weeks after the alleged assault?
I am thinking of Trump's positive definite statement in the confirmation that Kavanaugh was innocent. Could the Republicans totally have the goods on these people, and they are just trying to draw them out?
The thread that will unravel the Christine Ford conspiracy is the scrubbing of her internet presence, which began three weeks before her first letter was sent. It was an extraordinarily through job, suggesting professional skill, beyond the ability of Ford, who claims not to have known how to reach her own senator. It suggests careful planning to promote a fraud. What was it that no one could see if Ford’s story was to be credible? Recovering what can still be found, and what must be archived somewhere, is worth the effort. Looking closely at exactly how and from where the scrubbing was done would be a clue about who else was involved.
The Steele Dossier and Kavanaugh accusation have a lot in common, each being based on uncorroborated charges involving sex -- tailor-made to foment a media circus, which is now the tail that wags the political dog in America.
The fake scratchy little girl voice? Come on!!!
Obviously a total act. Top to bottom.
Debra Katz, introduced to Ford by Senator Diane Feinstein...”,
I do not accept that statement as true without a complete investigation and recovery of all of Ford’s communications. They created the appearance that Feinstein referred the innocent little Ford to Katz. But could have very well been Monica McLean weeks earlier. Katz probably advised about all the online scrubbing.
who’s our new AG?...hadn’t heard we lost the old one...
jugular
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
