Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Financial transaction tax could actually ease our national debt
The Hill ^ | November 1, 2018 | Patrick Colabella

Posted on 11/02/2018 7:56:26 AM PDT by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: C19fan

I’ve evolved over the years.

I remember screaming at the radio in the late 1980’s when “Deficits don’t matter” was the mantra and our debt was less than 1/10th that it is today.

Today, we’ve truly have gotten to the point where “deficits don’t matter” because we are not going to pay it back.

So like Dr. Strangelove - it’s been an evolution “How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the National Debt”.

The end will be equally absurd, but in the meantime, let’s keep taxes low, give everyone everything they want and worry about America after our printing presses have melted down.

I think we can limit the casualties of economic collapse to 10, maybe 20 million Americans tops, and it would still leave us with a formidable economy.

Long live the Dollar. All hail the New Dollar!!


21 posted on 11/02/2018 8:19:07 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

Congress does not have a Tax problem, it has a spending problem.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Precisely.

No matter how much revenue the District of Corruption receives it will never be enough.


22 posted on 11/02/2018 8:19:36 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Financial transactions are already taxed beyond meaningful reality

Dividends are double taxed. Capital gains are taxed fo no valid reason other than exidting and being unfair to the great unwashed mass of city dwelling Americans


23 posted on 11/02/2018 8:22:29 AM PDT by bert ((KE. N.P. N.C. +12) Invade Honduras. Provide a military government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

As someone who grew up in the welfare system - I am generally all for making welfare extremely limited. Limit the duration to maybe 3 years in a person’s lifetime. If used, you lose the right to vote for 20 years.

I don’t see much point in taxing it. That just adds a layer of paperwork shuffling.


24 posted on 11/02/2018 8:24:47 AM PDT by TheTimeOfMan (A time for peace and a time for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheTimeOfMan

Paperwork and shuffling add to the disincentive effect and it prepares people to pay taxes as all productive members of society do.


25 posted on 11/02/2018 8:28:08 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RainMan
Eliminate FICA?

I paid that for 50 years

and now tax the pittance I was able to save?

Sounds like a recipe for civil war.

26 posted on 11/02/2018 8:29:20 AM PDT by relee (Till the blue skies drive the dark clouds far away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Forget it, idiot! Do not ever mention it again! ever!


27 posted on 11/02/2018 8:38:11 AM PDT by I want the USA back (The country is suffering from a hysterical obsession with race, skin color and national origin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BTerclinger

Yes, and if you click on the Mexico part of the graphic you’ll see my math was correct.


28 posted on 11/02/2018 8:39:53 AM PDT by socalgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mplc51
Just Tax the money going back to Mexico. Problem solved.

They'll just route it to Mexico through a third country. Problem solved.

29 posted on 11/02/2018 8:42:08 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
One minor result would be the likely annihilation of retail banking.

Nonsense. Both SS retirement benefits and my non-gov't. pension payments can ONLY be received electronically. Even my weekly pay check when I worked was direct deposited. Back then I could elect to receive a paper check, but without a bank account it was next to impossible to cash....even at the bank it was drawn on.

Retail banking has itself well protected from idiocy like this.

30 posted on 11/02/2018 8:42:50 AM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BTerclinger
over $138 BILLION...

Confiscate every dollar of that and your deficit is down to $640 billion. Of course, that's a one time only solution.

31 posted on 11/02/2018 8:44:24 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

No, the money going to Mexico must be confiscated.

On proof of citizenship or valid residency, it will be transmitted.

Absent proof, it will remain confiscated and included in the fund to build the wall


32 posted on 11/02/2018 8:44:46 AM PDT by bert ((KE. N.P. N.C. +12) Invade Honduras. Provide a military government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: relee

“Sounds like a recipe for civil war.”

It will be just like the Civil War, and at the end the dollar will be worth every bit as much as the leftover Confederate money.

We aren’t paying our National Debt off, which means that your savings will be printed into oblivion with every political excuse used for explaining away the hyperinflation.


33 posted on 11/02/2018 8:44:47 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

If such a tax were passed, I’d find a way to keep all my company’s financial transactions from passing through a taxed entity.

Me, and about 12 million other US businesses.


34 posted on 11/02/2018 8:51:18 AM PDT by sitetest (No longer mostly dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“Politicians say, ‘More taxes will solve everything!’.......and the band played on....”


35 posted on 11/02/2018 8:54:02 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Tax it when they earn it. Tax it when they spend it. Tax it when they save it. Tax it when they buy something. Tax it when the sell something. Tax what they own. Tax what they do. Tax it when they die and try to leave it to their children.


36 posted on 11/02/2018 9:03:08 AM PDT by Chuckster (Battlestar Galactica is not fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Social Security is tax already at 85% for some of us that had saved other ways for the golden years. So you want the seniors to pay 87 - 88%. If so, when you reach 67 or what every the retirement age will be you will be looking at 90-100% tax on the yearly SS income on top of the other IRS taxes. If SS is still around. Good luck with that. I will be in the grave and have no worries by then. So TAX AWAY.


37 posted on 11/02/2018 9:10:12 AM PDT by Don_Ret_USAF ("No Government can survive Without The Trust Of The People.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Understand and agree with the sentiment, but unless you use cash for EVERY transaction and others - vendors, employees, customers, professional services, the government, etc. - are willing to accept such terms.....good luck.


38 posted on 11/02/2018 9:16:49 AM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Don_Ret_USAF

The Social Security tax is not 85%. You mean to say Social Security is taxed as normal income at an 85% tax rate.

What are you smoking? You don’t even know what tax you pay?


39 posted on 11/02/2018 9:24:27 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
The problem is NOT "too little tax revenue" going to FedGov.

The problem is ALWAYS FedGov taxes too much and spends way, way, WAY too much on things it has no business spending money on!

Cut SPENDING!

40 posted on 11/02/2018 9:28:50 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson