Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic effort to subvert the Electoral College plows into immovable GOP wall
The Washington Examiner ^ | March 29, 2019 | David M. Drucker

Posted on 03/28/2019 10:11:06 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

:...lost in 2016 while winning more votes nationally. “

If you take out the illegal votes and more importantly the anchor baby votes, then Trump wins in a land slide. Anchor babies are not American citizens and should be deported along with their criminal parents.


21 posted on 03/29/2019 4:03:59 AM PDT by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There was no popular vote contest in 2016 anymore than there was a swimsuit, talent or Miss Congeniality competition. There can be no national popular vote in future elections until we adopt common standards for voter registration, voter identification, vote casting, vote security, vote counting, and vote reporting.


22 posted on 03/29/2019 4:07:48 AM PDT by jimfree (My18 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dang Constitution!!


23 posted on 03/29/2019 4:46:30 AM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

The executive is rewarded for breadth of support, which is by design.. the founders intentionally set up a system to ensure a presedent would represent all the people not just go to populous states and ignore the rest.


24 posted on 03/29/2019 4:49:07 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Absolutely.

I was shocked they counted popular votes as early as the early 1800s.

What was the point!?!

The same as it is now??


25 posted on 03/29/2019 4:50:57 AM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if.. Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
whoever got the most votes nationwide

Do any of these proposed state laws specify HOW the "national popular vote" is to be determined, as in, WHO does the counting, HOW is the count certified and by whom, WHAT is the mechanism to audit the result and dispute the outcome (under what authority would that take place)?

26 posted on 03/29/2019 4:51:43 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2 = 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Over and over, things like this remind me of the true brilliance of our Founding Fathers.


27 posted on 03/29/2019 5:05:01 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I believe the only states to sign on to the ‘interstate compact’ (which is an end-around that pesky amendment process) are states with democrat legislatures and a democrat governor—which have already been awarding their electoral votes to the democrat candidate. Yet another reason not to vote for local dems, even if they aren’t crazy.

As I have stated before, you can rest assured that it the compact ever reached 270 and went into effect, a Republican winning the ‘popular vote’ would not receive these states’ electoral votes if it were to make a difference. In the days after the November election and the December electoral college vote, these same democrat governors would call their democrat-dominated legislature into emergency session to award their states’ electoral votes to the democrat candidate that won their in their state. They have no problem changing the rules if the rules mean they lose.


28 posted on 03/29/2019 5:39:42 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

They are NOT trying to amend the Constitution.
They are attempting a cute end-run whereby state legislatures merely pledge to award their state’s EVs to the winner of the popular vote.

I think what the article is saying is that every deep blue state that is likely to pass this has already done so.


29 posted on 03/29/2019 5:44:38 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

I am certain that Liberals demand a ‘popular vote’ to decide the US Presidency because with that system there are MANY more (and much easier) ways for them to manipulate the voting.

That’s why the ‘popular vote’ was not initiated from the start.


30 posted on 03/29/2019 5:49:53 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us - by obligations, not by rights".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Republicans can end this debate by stating one thing. “To our esteemed Democrat colleagues, we will do this. However, we propose that we do it by county. Whoever wins the popular vote in the county gets one point. Most points accumulated in the state wins the electoral votes. And we will drop all voter fraud investigations.”

Imagine winning Dallas, Houston, San Antonio and Austin by 250,000 votes and losing the state because the other 100+ counties were won by the republican candidate.


31 posted on 03/29/2019 6:00:13 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Trump is the best project/program/portfolio manager in the world!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nevada’s new Democrat Legislature is trying to make that switch.

Disgusting.

We are already a state that actually benefits from the Electoral College.

I think less than 6 million in the whole state...with an overflow of illegals in Las Vegas.


32 posted on 03/29/2019 6:04:52 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not to beat a dead horse, but...

'nuff said.

33 posted on 03/29/2019 7:53:46 AM PDT by upchuck (Home schooled kids are educated, not indoctrinated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This whole movement is born of two things:

1) butt-hurt sore loserism by Leftists after 2016

And

2) the Left’s fetish for centralizing all power so as to concentrate it in fewer hands....those who know what’s best for us...by which they of course mean themselves. The Left has long wanted to reduce the sovereign states to mere administrative conveniences of imperial Washington.


34 posted on 03/29/2019 8:43:04 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
They already have a way around it, award all electoral votes to the winner of the popular vote. Delaware just signed this into law https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Delaware-Changing-Way-Distributes-Electoral-College-Votes-507830801.html
35 posted on 03/29/2019 1:48:41 PM PDT by Bommer (Help 2ndDivisionVet - https://www.gofundme.com/mvc.php?route=category&term=married-recent-amputecan')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson