Michael Douglas was on to the beotch.
If I hadn’t known who bled this soiled screed, I would have guessed the author was a woman or homosexual male who, in the past, was deeply injured by an alpha male father or husband...and sure enough!
It takes an egomaniac to believe him/her self to be objective - no matter how many people join with him/her in a mutual admiration society.Objectivity is a laudable goal - not a state of being. But the egomaniacs at the NY Times boast of their own objectivity.
So the left hates Mueller again?
The projection...
I'm a bitter shrew who will write BS to make myself appear relevant, especially when I'm not.
Drinking again...
Maureen Dowd is, drinking again.
Projection. That statement is nothing more than a rather large window into the mind of the proglib.
They "knew" that he would lose to Queen Hilarious Rottenbottomus Clitorus.
When President of the United States of America Donald John Trump (I love saying that.) calmly swept the field of challengers and smoothly walked away with a not-even-close win the progs were left standing slack-jawed, unable to comprehend that normal American Citizens had made the choice, not the "more sophisticated and better educated elite" of the public.
Two years later?
They still can't understand losing.
They probably never will which makes them dangerous not only to themselves but to the Republic as well.
.
I am surprised the NYT can sell this rag without the fish already inside.
Donald Trump’s ... machinations are driven by ... vanity
Ive lived through a lot of presidents, almost every one an ego maniac. Maybe not Gerald Ford.
And yet, Ms Dowd, this scoundrel kicked Crooked Hillary’s pathetic and prodigious ass.
President Trump is in office because real Americans struck back at the LMSM. That’s you maureen. Ready for another?
Mark Levin’s rant on the report is a thing of beauty. He claims, because no real evidence is presented, that Volume II of the report is worthless.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knJtKbmCKQI
Nasty, Dowdy, hate-filled woman. Must take a lot of energy to keep the hate flames fanned.
did the ny times call baraqck obammer an ego maniac when he declared “I Won” with his nose in the air?
Don't you get the sense there's a man lurking in there, crying to get out?
Come out, Mo.
I guess this is their way of apologizing for over two years of lying, and publishing fake news.
There oughta be a law...
Now at least we have heard openly why the Democrats went after Trump in the firts palce - they just personally don’t like his personality and don’t like him.
Now just being an “egomaniac” (I, personally always saw Obama that way) makes you a target for a hoax with which to have an inside coup by the deep state, and if that does not work then impeachment.
“He did not want people to think that the Russians were responsible for his election”
1. Regardless of whatever the Russians did, the material impact of all they did was miniscule compared to all that both parties at every level, plus the two main compaigns, plus all the political action committees, plus all the other candidates for office, plus the American people independently did. The internal U.S. efforts were gargantuan compared to the pin prick weight of what the Russians did. Thus, the Russians were not “resonsible” for the election.
2. What Trumps key objection to was the Democrats and the intent of the Mueller investigation to portray Trump as in collusion with Russia. That is a nothing burger.
The NYslimes writer presents straw arguments that are not part of Trump’s essential disagreement about what was wrong with the Meuller Investigation.
And why was this the burr under his sociopathic saddle? Obviously, because he thinks he is an illegitimate president. He never expected to win.
The idea that he is in the Oval Office under false pretenses plays into his twisted sense of victimhood. The spoiled scion of Fifth Avenue somehow always finds a way to be aggrieved, a victim of the media, the deep state, “dirty cops,” note-taking aides and the elites — all out to get him.
Pop psychology. "Not expecting to win" doesn't mean "illegitimate." "Lucky" may be closer to the mark. And politics is for people with fight in them, not for people who accept whatever happens. I would say that Trump doesn't feel that he has a party or a base in DC behind him, so he's more combattive than other politicians are. Outsiders are like that.
It may be time for a moratorium on all the "psychopath," "sociopath," "malignant narcissist" talk on both sides. Everybody in politics is a narcissist. Everybody in politics has an overly large ego. Real psychotics, though, are few in politics. Normal people don't go into politics.
If you want to play long-distance psychiatrist and talk crazy you need a benchmark to measure by. Today's is Aaron Schock. I'm not saying he was a psychopath or sociopath or a psychotic or a malignant narcissist, but if a politician isn't a worse head-case than Aaron, he or she isn't any of those things either.