Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pete Buttigieg: Gun Control ‘Compatible with the Second Amendment’
Breitbart ^ | 21 April 2019 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 04/21/2019 9:05:00 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

So he would take guns away from non-violent honest citizens and leave them in the hands of violent criminals.


21 posted on 04/21/2019 9:27:35 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Lying Media: willing and eager allies of the hate-America left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Pete Buttigieg:

Round pegs go into round holes better than slits.


22 posted on 04/21/2019 9:28:05 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar
THIS is a Leader!

THIS is ^$%#$@#@$%^ massive flamer confusion!


23 posted on 04/21/2019 9:29:18 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Go infringe your husband's a$$!
24 posted on 04/21/2019 9:30:19 AM PDT by sevlex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Shall not be infringed’’. Don’t see how in any way that equates to control.


25 posted on 04/21/2019 9:36:30 AM PDT by jmacusa ("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis

Shhh...do not tell them. THEY are why we need a second amendment.


26 posted on 04/21/2019 9:39:04 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Pretty certain “they” have never noticed the word NOT in the 2nd amendment. For all these years “they” believe it reads “...shall be infringed....”


27 posted on 04/21/2019 9:43:18 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Any guy who willingly takes it in the butt is not someone I would ever want representing me at any level of government. Not local and definitely not national.

Butt bangers who support taking away gun rights like this Buttlicker guy are nothing more than the scum that grows under the barrels of dregs full of pond scum.


28 posted on 04/21/2019 9:44:04 AM PDT by Boomer (One can be an American or a Democrat but never both; not since Zero was elected anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

What in the world would Butthead have any idea about what ‘Compatibility’ is?


29 posted on 04/21/2019 9:45:33 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I think he understands, he is a polyglot.


30 posted on 04/21/2019 9:49:00 AM PDT by SMGFan ("God love ya! What am I talking about")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You won’t be infringing my rights, faggot.


31 posted on 04/21/2019 9:49:42 AM PDT by chris37 (Monday, March 25 2019 is Maga Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Pete is correct. Just like he is correct that a ‘marriage’ of two men or of two women is “compatible” within the sanctity of Christian marriage as given to us in the Old and New Testaments of the Bible and 2,000 years of Christian belief and teaching. (hint, it is not, the Pete is NOT correct)


32 posted on 04/21/2019 9:56:15 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
How exactly are MORE infringements than we already have compatible with “shall not be infringed”?

By excluding things from "the right of the people to keep and bear arms". If something is not covered by "the right of the people to keep and bear arms", laws against that something are not an infringement.

They may have the jump on us in that area because our side doesn't do a good job of addressing what is and what might not be covered by the right, except maybe the property rights folks who say the right does not cover people who are on private property if the property owner doesn't want it to.

33 posted on 04/21/2019 9:57:13 AM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

By “compatible” this two-bit Mussolini simply means that he considers himself free to ignore the Second Amendment completely and pass whatever laws he likes. Which is pretty much what the Dems have been doing anyway.


34 posted on 04/21/2019 10:03:10 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Gun control to me is using two hands to shoot to guns...and hitting the bullseye...


35 posted on 04/21/2019 10:05:41 AM PDT by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Forget who I stole this from, but:

Tench Coxe, a member of the Continental Congress, in an article published on February 20, 1788, wrote:

Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.

— William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

I think it’s pretty clear what the founding fathers meant.


36 posted on 04/21/2019 10:07:26 AM PDT by CMSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Just like the male anus is compatible with another man’s penis?


37 posted on 04/21/2019 10:13:20 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Buttigieg is a psycho, although a disciplined psycho, in the vein of Ted Bundy.

----------------------

By outward appearances, he was the quintessential all-American dreamboat: sharply dressed, with a full head of wavy dark hair; well-spoken, having studied psychology and the law. He defended himself confidently in court. When there was a lull in courtroom activity, he’d sit reading Nobel Prize-winning Russian literature.

Then he’d put the book down and get back to work: insisting he was not one of the most vicious and prolific serial killers in American history—despite overwhelming forensic evidence.

--------------------

Make NO mistake about, Bundy -ere- Buttigieg would slay you on the spot, if he could. He knows he can't, so he'll do the next best thing - run your life for you.

Psychopaths have no regard for society in general or its rules - his "gheyness" flaunted for one and all to see are prime example #1 (in my book.)

38 posted on 04/21/2019 10:18:00 AM PDT by _Jim (Save babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Buttigieg’s MAGA , Make America Gay Again ?


39 posted on 04/21/2019 10:20:00 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Trouble is there’s little outcry that he’s ‘flaming’ his sexual appetite for another man.


40 posted on 04/21/2019 10:22:12 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson