Posted on 04/21/2019 9:05:00 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
So he would take guns away from non-violent honest citizens and leave them in the hands of violent criminals.
Pete Buttigieg:
Round pegs go into round holes better than slits.
THIS is ^$%#$@#@$%^ massive flamer confusion!
“Shall not be infringed’’. Don’t see how in any way that equates to control.
Shhh...do not tell them. THEY are why we need a second amendment.
Pretty certain “they” have never noticed the word NOT in the 2nd amendment. For all these years “they” believe it reads “...shall be infringed....”
Any guy who willingly takes it in the butt is not someone I would ever want representing me at any level of government. Not local and definitely not national.
Butt bangers who support taking away gun rights like this Buttlicker guy are nothing more than the scum that grows under the barrels of dregs full of pond scum.
What in the world would Butthead have any idea about what ‘Compatibility’ is?
I think he understands, he is a polyglot.
You won’t be infringing my rights, faggot.
Pete is correct. Just like he is correct that a ‘marriage’ of two men or of two women is “compatible” within the sanctity of Christian marriage as given to us in the Old and New Testaments of the Bible and 2,000 years of Christian belief and teaching. (hint, it is not, the Pete is NOT correct)
By excluding things from "the right of the people to keep and bear arms". If something is not covered by "the right of the people to keep and bear arms", laws against that something are not an infringement.
They may have the jump on us in that area because our side doesn't do a good job of addressing what is and what might not be covered by the right, except maybe the property rights folks who say the right does not cover people who are on private property if the property owner doesn't want it to.
By “compatible” this two-bit Mussolini simply means that he considers himself free to ignore the Second Amendment completely and pass whatever laws he likes. Which is pretty much what the Dems have been doing anyway.
Gun control to me is using two hands to shoot to guns...and hitting the bullseye...
Forget who I stole this from, but:
Tench Coxe, a member of the Continental Congress, in an article published on February 20, 1788, wrote:
Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
I think it’s pretty clear what the founding fathers meant.
Just like the male anus is compatible with another man’s penis?
----------------------
By outward appearances, he was the quintessential all-American dreamboat: sharply dressed, with a full head of wavy dark hair; well-spoken, having studied psychology and the law. He defended himself confidently in court. When there was a lull in courtroom activity, hed sit reading Nobel Prize-winning Russian literature.
Then hed put the book down and get back to work: insisting he was not one of the most vicious and prolific serial killers in American historydespite overwhelming forensic evidence.
--------------------
Make NO mistake about, Bundy -ere- Buttigieg would slay you on the spot, if he could. He knows he can't, so he'll do the next best thing - run your life for you.
Psychopaths have no regard for society in general or its rules - his "gheyness" flaunted for one and all to see are prime example #1 (in my book.)
Buttigieg’s MAGA , Make America Gay Again ?
Trouble is there’s little outcry that he’s ‘flaming’ his sexual appetite for another man.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.